Do you think a religious person should have the right to not hire atheists based on their religion?

[UncleBuck]

My son has no right to make other people who don't want to serve him, serve him. Nobody does.

it's a yes or no question, pedo.

if your dream proceeds in indiana and people are allowed to deny service to gay people like your son, will there then be certain stores where your son is not allowed, thereby giving him a smaller set of goods and services to choose from?

 

[Rob Roy]

Why do believe your gay son (who wants to buy some batteries at your radio shack) is less deserving than the bigoted radio shack owners who don't want to serve him because he is gay?

Because Rape?

What you should have said was rapist tactics. People that rape and people that force other kinds of human interactions both use force. Forcing human interactions in a non defensive way is kind of a dickish thing to do.

Also, I don't believe he is less deserving, that has nothing to do with it. His need for batteries doesn't create any reason for him to be able to forcibly create an interaction with somebody on their own property if they'd rather not.

 

[UncleBuck]

People that rape and people that force other kinds of human interactions both use force.

if you can name one person in the history of america who was forced to open a public store rather than a private one, i will l eave the forum forever.

if you can't, your entire retarded philosophy falls apart.

 

[Rob Roy]

it's a yes or no question, pedo.

if your dream proceeds in indiana and people are allowed to deny service to gay people like your son, will there then be certain stores where your son is not allowed, thereby giving him a smaller set of goods and services to choose from?

If a turd falls on a floor, but there is nobody there to smell it, did it make a noise?

 

[UncleBuck]

If a turd falls on a floor, but there is nobody there to smell it, did it make a noise?

it's a yes or no question, pedo.

if your dream proceeds in indiana and people are allowed to deny service to gay people like your son, will there then be certain stores where your son is not allowed, thereby giving him a smaller set of goods and services to choose from?

i am kicking your non-intellectual ass. this is evident by your refusal to answer basic questions.

 

[Rob Roy]

People that rape are people like you. Rapist. Rape!!

Forcing human interaction blah blah blah suck my fucking dick. Tell me why you think it is OK to deny your gay son the basic human right to purchase batteries from your radio shack based on the fact that he enjoys the company of men. Rape rape, blah, blah, tiny wiener blah....bleh.....

It's not a human right to make somebody interact or trade with you using non defensive force or the threat of it.

Nor is it any humans right to keep people from interacting that wish to if all of the participants are willing.

The owners of radio shack have no right to keep him from enjoying the company of men, but they do have a right to control their OWN property.

 

[Rob Roy]

You open a Radio Shack. Unless I walk into your store without a shirt, or shoes, you are obligated by law to sell me some fucking batteries. You say fuck that! I don't sell batteries to fags.

Why would you say something like that Racist Rob? Why do you believe that your gay son should suffer without batteries just based on the fact that he enjoys sucking some cock?

I will tell you why. It is because you are a homophobic piece of shit. That is why.

Nice story, except it's full of lies.

First off, I'm obligated to leave people alone that leave me alone, and respect other peoples right to run their own life, the rest is all just shit legislators made up.

Second, if I had a store, discriminating based on sexual orientation wouldn't be my policy.

Third, I said my son was gay, he's a very happy fellow, where did you get the idea he likes to suck cock and why was one of your hands in your pants when you were typing the post I quoted?

 

[Pinworm]

Nice story, except it's full of lies.

First off, I'm obligated to leave people alone that leave me alone, and respect other peoples right to run their own life, the rest is all just shit legislators made up.

Second, if I had a store, discriminating based on sexual orientation wouldn't be my policy.

Third, I said my son was gay, he's a very happy fellow, where did you get the idea he likes to suck cock and why was one of your hands in your pants when you were typing the post I quoted?

Gut gut, Super gut. Sell me some batteries?

No? Because I enjoy felating wieners? Ok, whatever you say homophobe....

I'm stoked you respect these bigoted cunts....it makes for good funnies.

 

[King Arthur]

the baker is offended yet someone is insisting who can pay for what they want.

you have to figure out if your 'offended' is greater than your need for 'profit'.

seems to be moot anywhere but deep south/bible belt midwest, which indiana is part of.

do you do business where you don't like the store? the people in it? management?

you don't go back, right?

LGBT: if that 'one' baker must do your cake? c'mon now..there are plenty of choices that welcome everyone. why would you even want to spend your hard earned money on someone you can't have a business relationship with? bring it to those that do! like me

Baker: everyone's money is green and spends exactly the same.

Not every town has access to more than one baker, some towns don't have a baker.

My advice to anyone who wants to exclude people legally is to research it. If you don't want teens in your store run an adult video or bong shop. If you don't want christians in your store open up a satanic shop of horrors. If you don't want me in your store just be a dick and I won't come back .

 

[Rob Roy]

Gut gut, Super gut. Sell me some batteries?

No? Because I enjoy felating wieners? Ok, whatever you say homophobe....

I'm stoked you respect these bigoted cunts....it makes for good funnies.

Your ability to miscast another persons words is nearly as good as the floor shitter guy.

I don't respect bigots, I respect their right to control their own property and their own body. That doesn't mean I agree with what they do,

I can also respect a persons right to eat garbage and abuse their body, that doesn't mean I eat garbage or advocate others do.

I'm beginning to think you should put down the bong. Although I respect your right to continue to blow smoke up your own ass.

 

[reddan1981]

@Hypocrisy.
Is it better to use "Nigger",
"Fag" or "Retarded" as a derogatory insult?
Does intolerance to others only imply for certain topics ie; race, sexual orientation?
I may struggle to articulate an argument but there are some stupid fuckers on here pontificating about tolerance whilst blatantly being obtuse.

 

[NoDrama]

+Rep

I'd just like to provide evidence for what I previously claimed, that is - genetic diversity increases the rate of survival for offspring

"The Punnett square is a diagram that is used to predict an outcome of a particular cross or breeding experiment. It is named after Reginald C. Punnett, who devised the approach. The diagram is used by biologists to determine the probability of an offspring having a particular genotype. The Punnett square is a tabular summary of possible combinations of maternal allele's with paternal allele. These tables can be used to examine the genotypic outcome probabilities of the offspring of a single trait (allele), or when crossing multiple traits from the parents. The Punnett Square is a visual representation of Mendelian inheritance. It is important to understand the terms "heterozygous", "homozygous", "double heterozygote" (or homozygote), "dominant allele" and "recessive allele" when using the Punnet square method. For multiple traits, using the "forked-line method" is typically much easier than the Punnett square. Phenotypes may be assessed using a Punnet square, but the phenotype that may "appear" from a given genotype can rely on many things that you will learn about in further detail as you advance through Genetics."

Looking at this, you can see how the alleles from one gamete combined with another gamete with different alleles can create, in the offspring, a genetic variation more likely to survive than an offspring with the same alleles.

An offspring with "tt" is less likely to survive than an offspring with "Tt" if some variable comes along that specifically affects the "t" allele (shorter legs, brighter (less camouflaged) coat of fur, etc.) , right? Those with only "tt" will die off while those with "Tt & TT" will have a better chance at survival.

The lower left quadrant is incorrect, it should be 'tT'.

 

[NoDrama]

Your ability to miscast another persons words is nearly as good as the floor shitter guy.

I don't respect bigots, I respect their right to control their own property and their own body. That doesn't mean I agree with what they do,

I can also respect a persons right to eat garbage and abuse their body, that doesn't mean I eat garbage or advocate others do.

I'm beginning to think you should put down the bong. Although I respect your right to continue to blow smoke up your own ass.

But, Rob, Don't you know in liberal land, support for something automatically means you practice it, and the way it is always practiced is in a deceitful or evil way?

Facetious? Yes.

 

[Rob Roy]

But, Rob, Don't you know in liberal land, support for something automatically means you practice it, and the way it is always practiced is in a deceitful or evil way?

Facetious? Yes.

The concept of letting other people determine their own happiness or misery is lost on controlling people that know how to run your life for you.

 

[Pinworm]

The concept of letting other people determine their own happiness or misery is lost on controlling people that know how to run your life for you.

Hey, Rob...if someone refuses to sell someone goods and services on the specific basis that they are gay, who is the aggressor in that situation?

 

[Rob Roy]

Hey, Rob...if someone refuses to sell someone goods and services on the specific basis that they are gay, who is the aggressor in that situation?

Refusing to interact with a person is not an act of actionable aggression. It is an act of neutrality. The KKK harmed people when they went to the other persons homes and fucked with them. If they had stayed home and paraded around their own living room in their hoods, they might be considered stupid, but it wouldn't have created an actionable harm to people.

The reason(s) a person choses not to interact with another person, may not meet with your approval or mine, but that doesn't give us the right to INITIATE a forced interaction or burn crosses on other peoples lawns.

Forcing an interaction with an unwilling person in a non-defensive way is an act of INITIATED aggression.

Are you implying that gay people have the right to force somebody to interact with them, while at the same time understanding nobody has the right to prevent a gay person from controlling themselves on their own property?

 

[Rob Roy]

View attachment 3392174

Quit fucking my tits and actually answer my question, racist rob....

I think your comprehension erm "skills" are limiting your ability to continue this conversation in a meaningful way. You see, I did answer your question.

You have no more right to force an interaction than the KKK does when they burn crosses on other peoples property.

 

[Pinworm]

I think your comprehension erm "skills" are limiting your ability to continue this conversation in a meaningful way. You see, I did answer your question.

You have no more right to force an interaction than the KKK does when they burn crosses on other peoples property.

So, you are saying....nope...I only wish to continue to ram my dick into your lush titties, and dance around your actual question. That's very unscholarly of you, Robby.

 

[Rob Roy]

So, you are saying....nope...I only wish to continue to ram my dick into your lush titties, and dance around your actual question. That's very unscholarly of you, Robby.

No. I'm saying you have the right to manipulate your own titties. Unless another person grants you permission, you don't have the right to manipulate their titties.

 

[Padawanbater2]

The lower left quadrant is incorrect, it should be 'tT'.

Both represent the same thing