Your fired

Jimdamick

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
Trump has jumped into an old favorite phrase, sooner than later it seems, with the Attorney General Sally Yates. telling her that your fired, a term he has carried over from his The Apprentice days.
She had the temerity to refuse to follow Trumps un-Constitutional directive pertaining to immigrants from certain Muslim countries, and would not follow it through to prosecute and carry it out, which stuck in his little craw.
She actually had the gut's to stand up to that Fascist pig, and was terminated as a result.

This is the question, will she be the last to have her head chopped off, or merely the 1st.

I bet she will not be the last.
 
S

spandy

Well-Known Member
“After eight long years of a lawless Obama Department of Justice, it is fitting–and sad–that the very last act of the Obama DOJ is for the Acting AG to defy the newly elected President, refuse to enforce the law, and force the President to fire her. Sally Yates now joins the ignominious succession, from Eric Holder to Loretta Lynch, of Attorneys General who put brazen partisan interests above fidelity to law.”

“President Trump was exactly right to fire an acting Attorney General who refused to carry out her constitutional duty to enforce and defend the law. Yates’ lawless partisanship highlights why the Senate needs to act now–and Senate Democrats should end their extreme political obstruction and delay–and confirm Jeff Sessions immediately. America needs and deserves an Attorney General who will be faithful to the Constitution and uphold the law.”



Who's next?
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
spandy said:
“After eight long years of a lawless Obama Department of Justice, it is fitting–and sad–that the very last act of the Obama DOJ is for the Acting AG to defy the newly elected President, refuse to enforce the law, and force the President to fire her. Sally Yates now joins the ignominious succession, from Eric Holder to Loretta Lynch, of Attorneys General who put brazen partisan interests above fidelity to law.”

“President Trump was exactly right to fire an acting Attorney General who refused to carry out her constitutional duty to enforce and defend the law. Yates’ lawless partisanship highlights why the Senate needs to act now–and Senate Democrats should end their extreme political obstruction and delay–and confirm Jeff Sessions immediately. America needs and deserves an Attorney General who will be faithful to the Constitution and uphold the law.”


Who's next?
Click to expand...
You are. It is time to have "TRUMP!" tattooed on your asshole. Take a deep breath.


"You have to watch out because people will be asking you to do things and you need to say no. You think the attorney general has the responsibility to say no to the President if he asks for something that's improper?" Jeff Sessions asks Yates at her 2015 confirmation hearing.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
spandy said:
“After eight long years of a lawless Obama Department of Justice, it is fitting–and sad–that the very last act of the Obama DOJ is for the Acting AG to defy the newly elected President, refuse to enforce the law, and force the President to fire her. Sally Yates now joins the ignominious succession, from Eric Holder to Loretta Lynch, of Attorneys General who put brazen partisan interests above fidelity to law.”

“President Trump was exactly right to fire an acting Attorney General who refused to carry out her constitutional duty to enforce and defend the law. Yates’ lawless partisanship highlights why the Senate needs to act now–and Senate Democrats should end their extreme political obstruction and delay–and confirm Jeff Sessions immediately. America needs and deserves an Attorney General who will be faithful to the Constitution and uphold the law.”



Who's next?
Click to expand...
You sad partisan hack.

She WAS upholding the Constitution.

If you applaud her firing and replacement with someone who won't, it will only be a matter of time before they come for you.

Ignorance is no defense under the law. That includes a court of law, the laws of politics or the law of the jungle. Your opinion carries no weight because it isn't based on reason.

You're a willing tool of those who would enrich themselves at your expense. The only deplorable thing about it is that you'll help ensure others suffer, too.
 
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
spandy said:
“After eight long years of a lawless Obama Department of Justice, it is fitting–and sad–that the very last act of the Obama DOJ is for the Acting AG to defy the newly elected President, refuse to enforce the law, and force the President to fire her. Sally Yates now joins the ignominious succession, from Eric Holder to Loretta Lynch, of Attorneys General who put brazen partisan interests above fidelity to law.”

“President Trump was exactly right to fire an acting Attorney General who refused to carry out her constitutional duty to enforce and defend the law. Yates’ lawless partisanship highlights why the Senate needs to act now–and Senate Democrats should end their extreme political obstruction and delay–and confirm Jeff Sessions immediately. America needs and deserves an Attorney General who will be faithful to the Constitution and uphold the law.”



Who's next?
Click to expand...
Lol...

How long did the Republicans block the Supreme Court appointment for?

So if you don't like it, go truck yourself.
 
Antidisestablishmentarian

Antidisestablishmentarian

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
You sad partisan hack.

She WAS upholding the Constitution.

If you applaud her firing and replacement with someone who won't, it will only be a matter of time before they come for you.

Ignorance is no defense under the law. That includes a court of law, the laws of politics or the law of the jungle. Your opinion carries no weight because it isn't based on reason.

You're a willing tool of those who would enrich themselves at your expense. The only deplorable thing about it is that you'll help ensure others suffer, too.
Click to expand...
What part of the constitution?
 
Bear420

Bear420

Well-Known Member
The news seems to be loving what he is doing, I guess they love the fact more people are watching the news now, and they're also playing into the King DT hand doing exactly what he wants, Now their call the SCOTUS His finalist's wtf. Really Not considerations, nominee's or Picks, Just like the Apprentice FINALISTS Really, "lol"

BTW, didn't Trump say, I am going to take what ever My Cabinet Members say He will listen, and then do what that think is best. isn't that OUR Government working for the People?
IMO all this is going to do is cause us to have Problems with some BAD DUDES!

I don't understand why some feel this is okay, Just stop and listen to the rest of the world...When our allies have questions, Shouldn't we?

BAN.....More Alternative Facts. This is getting Serious,

I Almost forgot, Your Fired
 
Jimdamick

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
Antidisestablishmentarian said:
What part of the constitution?
Click to expand...
That no one shall be discriminated due to their religion, and tell me that's not the case here.
If it's about terrorist nations only, why isn't Saudi Arabia on the list, considering individuals from that country have killed thousands of Americans.

This bullshit is to pacify his base, which are dumb as fuck, racist assholes that are about to destroy the world with their idiotic opinions.

We are fucked
 
Last edited:
Antidisestablishmentarian

Antidisestablishmentarian

Well-Known Member
Jimdamick said:
That no one shall be discriminated due to religion, and tell me that's not the case here.
If it's about terrorist nations only, why isn't Saudi Arabia on the list, considering individuals from that country have killed thousands of Americans.

This bullshit is to pacify his base, which are dumb as fuck, racist assholes that are about to destroy the world with their idiotic opinions.

We are fucked
Click to expand...
Where is religion mentioned by the EO? Why can muslims still come here if there is a ban on them? How does our constitution cover people living in foreign lands that are not citizens of the US? If it's so unconstitutional, why did the DOJ say it was good to go? Why did Obama not put SA on the list trump used? Can they not be added(answer is yes, yes they can be added)?
 
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
Antidisestablishmentarian said:
Where is religion mentioned by the EO? Why can muslims still come here if there is a ban on them? How does our constitution cover people living in foreign lands that are not citizens of the US? If it's so unconstitutional, why did the DOJ say it was good to go? Why did Obama not put SA on the list trump used? Can they not be added(answer is yes, yes they can be added)?
Click to expand...
The States are required to treat all people legally living within their State.

So the green card holders and other permanent residents that are being detained or refused clearance to return to their home are being fucked over.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Classic fascist tactics; create a rule or an order that's way out of line, then complain to his base when it's walked back within the boundaries of the law. Red meat for the stupid, because most of these people don't have enough of an education to realize how badly they're being played...

Well, shagged.

Poor, stupid rural white Rednecks are being shagged by the thousands already and yet they don't understand enough to realize it.

Even the term redneck was a label for those Tennessee coal miners of the early 19th century who fought AGAINST big companies who cheated them. Betcha damn few of you who style yourselves as such have any clue what the term really means.

You've been shagged.
 
7

757growin

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Classic fascist tactics; create a rule or an order that's way out of line, then complain to his base when it's walked back within the boundaries of the law. Red meat for the stupid, because most of these people don't have enough of an education to realize how badly they're being played...

Well, shagged.

Poor, stupid rural white Rednecks are being shagged by the thousands already and yet they don't understand enough to realize it.

Even the term redneck was a label for those Tennessee coal miners of the early 19th century who fought AGAINST big companies who cheated them. Betcha damn few of you who style yourselves as such have any clue what the term really means.

You've been shagged.
Click to expand...
I always thought redneck was a name from the slaves, given to their overseer. Because his pasty neck would burn when he was out in the sun all day. Thanks for the info. I'll have to research some. But 100% agree with the sentiment of your comment
 
rkymtnman

rkymtnman

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Classic fascist tactics; create a rule or an order that's way out of line, then complain to his base when it's walked back within the boundaries of the law. Red meat for the stupid, because most of these people don't have enough of an education to realize how badly they're being played...

Well, shagged.

Poor, stupid rural white Rednecks are being shagged by the thousands already and yet they don't understand enough to realize it.

Even the term redneck was a label for those Tennessee coal miners of the early 19th century who fought AGAINST big companies who cheated them. Betcha damn few of you who style yourselves as such have any clue what the term really means.

You've been shagged.
Click to expand...
sad but true. too stupid to realize they are the butt of the joke
 
rkymtnman

rkymtnman

Well-Known Member
i thought it was more after slavery got repealed and the whites that weren't used to doing shit had to actually go do a days work to replace the slave labor.

but yes, dumb and lazy as fuck.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top