Another white guy gun massacre.

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
sorry for being misleading.

40 times more likely is wrong.

it is actually 43 times more likely that you kill yourself or a loved one rather than an intruder:

for every self-defense homicide via firearm, there were 43 suicides, criminal homicides, or accidental gunshot deaths.[11]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Kellermann
Yet the statistics are based almost entirely on the fact "people are more likely to commit suicide with a gun if they own a gun".

Don't be obtuse, even quickly running the numbers in your head you should see what I'm saying is correct.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
i consider shooting oneself in the head with a gun to be a gun death.
Saying you're more likely to kill yourself with a gun if you own a gun is retarded, I'm sorry but it is.

All Im saying is there's over 600 reasons since Las Vegas to initiate gun control measures and resorting to statistical nonsense doesn't help the cause at all.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
It is what it is. I don't pretend to know a solution to gun violence. I have not taken a stance here as a gun advocate.

I merely pointed out that it is not against the law to research gun violence, as buck erroneously informed our Canadian friend.

You, however, have not said anything untrue that I am aware. Carry on:clap:
Yeah, I figured you were just playing the same old delay game. The problem that you have is gun ownership in this country is declining to the point where gun owners are a minority of only 35%. You still have the grace of non gun owners who are standing for your kind's demand of practically unlimited fire power but the numbers are against you.

As a non-gun owner, there is nothing I can do to reduce gun violence but gun owners can. If you and your kind don't take action to find ways to reduce gun deaths to at least the level in Canada, I assure you that when the super majority says enough, you won't like the measures we take. It's up to you.

Yet here you are, niggling over some stupid detail regarding an underfunded and ineffective research at the DOJ. You will lose eventually and I won't have sympathy for you.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Saying you're more likely to kill yourself with a gun if you own a gun is retarded, I'm sorry but it is.

All Im saying is there's over 600 reasons since Las Vegas to initiate gun control measures and resorting to statistical nonsense doesn't help the cause at all.
I'm all for gun owners using their guns to commit suicide. It's practically the only good reason to own one.
 

MrRoboto

Well-Known Member
Yeah, I figured you were just playing the same old delay game. The problem that you have is gun ownership in this country is declining to the point where gun owners are a minority of only 35%. You still have the grace of non gun owners who are standing for your kind's demand of practically unlimited fire power but the numbers are against you.

As a non-gun owner, there is nothing I can do to reduce gun violence but gun owners can. If you and your kind don't take action to find ways to reduce gun deaths to at least the level in Canada, I assure you that when the super majority says enough, you won't like the measures we take. It's up to you.

Yet here you are, niggling over some stupid detail regarding an underfunded and ineffective research at the DOJ. You will lose eventually and I won't have sympathy for you.
I'm not niggling, you are. "Oh, the funding is inadequate". Kick a few bucks in. Put your money where your mouth is. Start a gun research charity. Big brother is not the only means for funding. If the citizens of this country want gun control, what is stopping them? The NRA? Start an anti-NRA. Like I give a fuck.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I'm not niggling, you are. "Oh, the funding is inadequate". Kick a few bucks in. Put your money where your mouth is. Start a gun research charity. Big brother is not the only means for funding. If the citizens of this country want gun control, what is stopping them? The NRA? Start an anti-NRA. Like I give a fuck.
you give so few fucks. just look at how few fucks you give.

LOL
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
I'm not niggling, you are. "Oh, the funding is inadequate". Kick a few bucks in. Put your money where your mouth is. Start a gun research charity. Big brother is not the only means for funding. If the citizens of this country want gun control, what is stopping them? The NRA? Start an anti-NRA. Like I give a fuck.
Well then, Mr gun owner, do something. Contact the NRA yourself or your Congressman to advocate for something you are OK with. You own this problem, not me. I assure you that there are anti-NRA movements out there, they are getting stronger and we will restrict your rights to own guns. I'd rather you gun owners figure out something that you prefer but if you don't, then we will just take draconian measures because we really don't care about your access to your penis surrogates. If you are OK with that then just wait and watch. It will happen and gun owners are going to cry bloody murder. By then it will be too late because the super majority will hold the whip hand.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Joking aside, I don't think guns should be banned at all but there should be a waiting period of say 6 months? Gives plenty of time for background checks and for people to fuck up in the interim (automatically cancelling their application, non-refundable).
It would also likely cause an angry white to have to wait for 6 months before proceeding with their planned senseless massacre.
 
Top