The Democratic Party Autopsy Report

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Translation:

'Forcing' a racist white person to serve a black person at a local restaurant is just as bad as 'forcibly preventing' a pedophile from engaging in the grooming and eventual statutory raping of a child.

Savage. Stay away from vulnerable children.


Not sure how you translated my wishing everybody of every race has an equal opportunity to make their own choices about their own body and their own property into being savage. Is it wrong to self determine and right to force other people to associate with you if they don't want to ?

Does the possibility that some people might not want to associate with others give you a right to make them do so? Do you also hold prohibitionist views concerning the use of marijuana ? Do you think you have the right to prevent a person from controlling their own body? I'd say you do, since forcing an otherwise neutral behaving person to serve somebody provides evidence of that.

Also you seem unwilling or incapable of answering some of my questions.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
answer or reply in the red
Jim Crow laws? I'd have ignored them. I'm an abolitionist in that regard. Others more interested in political action could have begged those laws to be changed I suppose, but the political change that did happen was simply a redirection of the force of the third party (government) which is kind of ironic.

It's not up to me to "prevent discrimination and segregation" since ultimately I can rightfully only control my own body and my own property. It is up to me though to determine with whom I will associate, hence why I would have ignored Jim Crow laws and associated with people who mutually wanted to associate with me.

Sorry to hear both you and your future wife were in the forcibly segregated army. Why would you chose to belong to an organization which would dictate to you who you could or could not associate with? Sounds like you were feeding the idea that other people have some right to control you, when all any of us has is a right to control ourselves.
 
Last edited:

SunnyJim

Well-Known Member
Not sure how you translated my wishing everybody of every race has an equal opportunity to make their own choices about their own body and their own property into being savage. Is it wrong to self determine and right to force other people to associate with you if they don't want to ?

Does the possibility that some people might not want to associate with others give you a right to make them do so? Do you also hold prohibitionist views concerning the use of marijuana ? Do you think you have the right to prevent a person from controlling their own body? I'd say you do, since forcing an otherwise neutral behaving person to serve somebody provides evidence of that.

Also you seem unwilling or incapable of answering some of my questions.
You repeatedly ask the same questions, and you repeatedly receive answers to those questions. You wait a few days, then you ask the same questions again whilst accusing me (and others) of being unwilling or unable to answer. You should be concerned about the current state of your mental health.

Once again, yes, in some instances, it is wrong to self-determine and right to force other people to 'associate' with me even if they don't want to.

Denial of this is primitive thinking.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
You repeatedly ask the same questions, and you repeatedly receive answers to those questions. You wait a few days, then you ask the same questions again whilst accusing me (and others) of being unwilling or unable to answer. You should be concerned about the current state of your mental health.

Once again, yes, in some instances, it is wrong to self-determine and right to force other people to 'associate' with me even if they don't want to.

Denial of this is primitive thinking.

Thank you for making your opinion clear. I appreciate that clarity.

I'm sorry that you believe you have a right to force people to associate with you. I'll make sure my grandson knows to run away if he hears the name Sunny Jim.
 

SunnyJim

Well-Known Member
Thank you for making your opinion clear. I appreciate that clarity.

I'm sorry that you believe you have a right to force people to associate with you. I'll make sure my grandson knows to run away if he hears the name Sunny Jim.
You're welcome.

Make sure your grandson also knows that if he denies service to a black person at his place of business because his grandfather encouraged him to ignore black people, that he would be breaking the law and subject to criminal and civil proceedings.
 

ChefKimbo

Well-Known Member
Once again, yes, in some instances, it is wrong to self-determine and right to force other people to 'associate' with me even if they don't want to.

Denial of this is primitive thinking.
This statement speaks VOLUMES. Its the typical supremacist school of thought. Usually surfaces when their reasonings are completely shitcanned. These discussions usually end with, "Well if you don't like you can always go back to Africa".
 

ChefKimbo

Well-Known Member
You're welcome.

Make sure your grandson also knows that if he denies service to a black person at his place of business because his grandfather encouraged him to ignore black people, that he would be breaking the law and subject to criminal and civil proceedings.
Blacks never gave a shit about denial of service until those supremastic elements of state governments made sure blacks could no longer provide their own services.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
You're welcome.

Make sure your grandson also knows that if he denies service to a black person at his place of business because his grandfather encouraged him to ignore black people, that he would be breaking the law and subject to criminal and civil proceedings.

I will encourage him to respect other people and to ignore bad laws.
 

SunnyJim

Well-Known Member
I will encourage him to respect other people and to ignore bad laws.
I have no doubt you will.


This statement speaks VOLUMES. Its the typical supremacist school of thought. Usually surfaces when their reasonings are completely shitcanned. These discussions usually end with, "Well if you don't like you can always go back to Africa".
And this statement makes no sense. Let's try to unpack it.

This statement speaks VOLUMES. Its the typical supremacist school of thought.
My statement is the 'typical supremacist school of thought'? Indecipherable jargon. It seems you're struggling with the definition of 'supremacist'. There is no 'supremacy' in the Civil Rights Act. Serve customers of all races/ethnicity in your restaurant, or serve no one in your restaurant.

Usually surfaces when their reasonings are completely shitcanned.
My reasoning has been completely 'shitcanned'? By who, you and Rob Roy? Good one.

These discussions usually end with, "Well if you don't like you can always go back to Africa".
If you're saying that you end these civil rights discussions by saying "Well if you don't like you can always go back to Africa," I believe you.


And now for the next one:

Blacks never gave a shit about denial of service until those supremastic elements of state governments made sure blacks could no longer provide their own services.
We'll pretend that you aren't making up words like 'supremastic' to support your argument because it isn't even the most outrageous component of your statement, your statement is more outrageous when taken in its entirety.

Blacks have been enslaved, segregated and denied service for millennia. Please provide an example of when times were golden for black people until "state governments made sure blacks could no longer provide their own services."
 

PCXV

Well-Known Member
Thank you for making your opinion clear. I appreciate that clarity.

I'm sorry that you believe you have a right to force people to associate with you. I'll make sure my grandson knows to run away if he hears the name Sunny Jim.
Run away to the public school he goes to, or down the paved city road, or to deliver your tax payments personally?
 

ChefKimbo

Well-Known Member
Supremacist-an advocate of the supremacy of a particular group, especially one determined by race or sex.

Ill give you this, you are an expert at saying absolutely nothing. You have trouble responding directly to any statement and you simply cant answer any straight forward questions honestly. I gave you the bait in my grammar, and chewed it down to the bone because there is no substance to anything you say at all.. All im getting here is the arrogance of not having to give a shit about any other culture but your own. That is why you are....SUPREMASTIC.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
This statement speaks VOLUMES. Its the typical supremacist school of thought. Usually surfaces when their reasonings are completely shitcanned. These discussions usually end with, "Well if you don't like you can always go back to Africa".
you've got it 100% backwards.

it is people like you and tobroy and twopump who hate civil rights laws and are racist who say that racist shit.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Supremacist-an advocate of the supremacy of a particular group, especially one determined by race or sex.

Ill give you this, you are an expert at saying absolutely nothing. You have trouble responding directly to any statement and you simply cant answer any straight forward questions honestly. I gave you the bait in my grammar, and chewed it down to the bone because there is no substance to anything you say at all.. All im getting here is the arrogance of not having to give a shit about any other culture but your own. That is why you are....SUPREMASTIC.
How do you feel about civil right laws ?
 
Top