President Obama Is Leading Us Deeper Into Tyranny

[Ringsixty]

Hitler is a bit harsh for a selection in the poll.

But, I picked it anyway

 

[Dan Kone]

I admit the use of Hitler stirs up emotion, especially when you mention dead Jews.
Hitler didn't kill 6 million Jews! The people did!
Obama didn't kill any Muslims! The people did!
And I never said Obama was some incarnation of Hitler.
I did not say we are in a Nazi State committing genocide either.
The concept I'm trying to bring across is very linear.
Are we closer to the ideals of Benjamin Franklin, or Adolf Hitler.
Your attempt to discredit the parallels, without justly weighing them.
Hell, I have more animosity towards Jews(Zionist) then Obama.

You realize that Obama didn't go out and collect 6 million muslims from all over and put them in concentration camps and gas them for the purposes of ethnic cleansing right?

The idea that Obama is somehow similar to hitler is retarded. It makes you seem retarded for even considering it.

 

[Dan Kone]

Still trying to figure out how that was "legal."

I could have swore the Nuremberg trials really happened, but I must have imagined them.

 

[sync0s]

I blame you, and I blame me. This vessel elects it's leadership, therefore the crew is to blame.

I didn't vote for Obama, so what do you want me to do? Kill him?

 

[Sure Shot]

I didn't vote for Obama, so what do you want me to do? Kill him?

If your only tool is a hammer, every problem is handled like a nail.
The pen is mightier then the sword.
Why is this?, you may ask. It might sound illogical at first or even utopian in concept.
But it can be quite elementary, if you break it down to simpler terms.
The pen is the tool of information.
The sword is the tool of a soldier.
So;
Pen = Information
Sword = Soldier

How does information relate to a soldier then?
A soldier becomes a soldier based on information he has received.
At some point information reached a critical mass,
and the individual determined his position as a soldier based upon such information.
If no new information is submitted, then that individual will likely hold said position indefinitely.

So, you can see the catalyst in all this is information.
Therefore,

Information>Soldier = Pen>Sword
​

​

It should be noted that, catalyst's can have a positive or negative effect.
This is why debate and controversy are crucial.
For as long as there is controversy, the truth shall prevail in the end.
For truth is infallible, yet malleable.

 

[Dan Kone]

Does it bother you that you're comparing Obama to Hitler for a hypothetical problem that doesn't exist yet? Or is that fair game now?

 

[NLXSK1]

Does it bother you that you're comparing Obama to Hitler for a hypothetical problem that doesn't exist yet? Or is that fair game now?

He is a political figure, everything is fair game.

Not like other political personalities have been compared to Hitler and worse.

 

[Dan Kone]

He is a political figure, everything is fair game.

Not like other political personalities have been compared to Hitler and worse.

Ok. But this thread is comparing him to Hitler for not solving a problem that doesn't actually exist yet. Is that reasonable?

 

[Sure Shot]

Does it bother you that you're comparing Obama to Hitler for a hypothetical problem that doesn't exist yet? Or is that fair game now?

I haven't proposed anything hypothetical.
I'm afraid you may have failed to grasp the main concept of this thread.
In fact, the idea is that you are the first to directly compare Obama to Hitler, and are the one continuing to do so.
My use of Hitler, was to propose a polar opposite to Franklin.This was to make a scale for the voting process.
The question I put forth, is where would you put us on that scale.
I did not propose that we were on either end of said scale.
Rather that the scale was tilting and we were sliding in that direction of a "Gestapo" society.

 

[Dan Kone]

I haven't proposed anything hypothetical.
I'm afraid you may have failed to grasp the main concept of this thread.

clearly....

In fact, the idea is that you are the first to directly compare Obama to Hitler, and are the one continuing to do so.

No, I think your poll took care of that.

My use of Hitler, was to propose a polar opposite to Franklin.This was to make a scale for the voting process.

Very sensible decision you made there. Well done.

The question I put forth, is where would you put us on that scale.

I went with the option where we weren't on the path to committing genocide on 6 million jews.

I did not propose that we were on either end of said scale.

Just heading towards it. Got it. Yeah, don't think we are on the path to killing 6 million jews.

Rather that the scale was tilting and we were sliding in that direction of a "Gestapo" society.

I see. And you think this is a real problem?

 

[Catchin22]

Sure Shot. You're good with 2 things..

1. Quotes.
2. Fluff.

 

[UncleBuck]

i had no idea there was such a thing as "adolph hitler security".

my relatives who died in the holocaust would probably take issue with you on that one.

 

[Sure Shot]

Hitler didn't kill 6 million Jews.
The Germans did.

It's very easy for people to commit atrocities if they don't hold themselves directly responsible.

[youtube]ZB8AMUHq2HY[/youtube]

Short animated rehash
[youtube]0L-hKsjGP1M[/youtube]

 

[Sure Shot]

Once a soldier, once a wallstreet banker, only now does he see the truth.
[youtube]YOORRZw3n6I[/youtube]

 

[Carne Seca]

It was legal in germany, because it is what the majority wanted, therefore it was legal for them. I guess.. Might be a bit historically incorrect, but you get the gist.

If it were legal there wouldn't have been war crime tribunals and executions of convicted criminals.

 

[Sure Shot]

If it were legal there wouldn't have been war crime tribunals and executions of convicted criminals.

Was is legal to invade Iraq in 91'?

Charges were filed against each one of these individuals on 19 counts of illegality.
George Bush, J. Danforth Quayle, James Baker,
Richard Cheney, William Webster, Colin Powell,
Norman Schwarzkopf and Others.

Among the charges were;
Crimes Against Peace, War Crimes, Crimes Against
Humanity and Other Criminal Acts and High Crimes in
Violation of the Charter of the United Nations,
International Law, the Constitution of the United States
and Laws made in Pursuance Thereof.

Final Judgement: International War Crimes Tribunal

 

[Dan Kone]

This thread has proven something though. 66.67% of people voting in this poll so far are retarded.

 

[UncleBuck]

because there was no option for "i like turtles", i chose "none of the above" by refraining from voting.

 

[Canna Sylvan]

This thread has proven something though. 66.67% of people voting in this poll so far are retarded.

Says he who picked Benjamin Franklin "freedom."

"Why should the Palatine Boors be suffered to swarm into our Settlements, and by herding together establish their Language and Manners to the exclusion of ours? Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a Colony of Aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our Anglifying them, and will never adopt our Language or Customs, any more than they can acquire our Complexion?" (The papers of Benjamin Franklin. Ed. Leonard W. Labaree. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1959. vol 4:234).

Freedom for all, but the Pennsylvania Dutch! See, Ben was Nostradamus. He predicted from their kind would produce Hitler.

 

[Canna Sylvan]

because there was no option for "i like turtles", i chose "none of the above" by refraining from voting.

I didn't like the question. So I too refrain from voting. Even though I have my suspicions Obama might be a tyrant. First there needs to be proof of his Kenyan citizenship. Then I'll vote for MTV.