stuff..things..ideas

[lokie]

Just an observation that does not need a thread of its own so I'll post it in here.

As an Alcoholic, I have noticed that when some folks disagree they always want to go for the "Your drunk" card
and beat you with that statement like it was a baseball bat, completely disregarding what the disagreement was about.

Then when a similar disagreement comes around again and I'm sober they can not call me drunk, that is a good feeling,
but I still don't have what it takes to tell them they are stupid whether I'm drunk or not.

rant over

 

[Chief Walkin Eagle]

Hmmm I'll watch the documentary.. But don't you think it would be really stupid of them to even release those photos to the public? I doubt they would. And not to sound like a dick chief, but I don't consider blurred out spots much proof. .. the smile means I don't wanna seem dickish.

You dont consider edited photos as proof of the government trying to hide something? And its true, all 1.8 million of those photos are open to the public. But judging from your strict standards for evidence I dont know if you'll get anything from this video. I posted this video for the skeptics to nit pick and only Heis pointed something out but he pointed out the obvious bullshit and ignored the legit stuff. Doer was pretty interested in the points the video made (Im pretty sure Doer is a skeptic... someone correct me if Im wrong lol).

 

[Zaehet Strife]

Mindphuk, did you write that yourself? I mean, if you didn't that doesn't make the message any less relevant. I just want to know because whoever wrote that did an extremely good job and i would like to give credit to the appropriate person.

 

[mindphuk]

You dont consider edited photos as proof of the government trying to hide something? And its true, all 1.8 million of those photos are open to the public. But judging from your strict standards for evidence I dont know if you'll get anything from this video. I posted this video for the skeptics to nit pick and only Heis pointed something out but he pointed out the obvious bullshit and ignored the legit stuff. Doer was pretty interested in the points the video made (Im pretty sure Doer is a skeptic... someone correct me if Im wrong lol).

Is this the video where they are 'shocked' to find out the moon actually has some color or the video where they mistake pixelation for airbrushed smudges?

 

[mindphuk]

Mindphuk, did you write that yourself? I mean, if you didn't that doesn't make the message any less relevant. I just want to know because whoever wrote that did an extremely good job and i would like to give credit to the appropriate person.

I'm sorry, it appears I forgot the link. It was a copy & paste from the Book of Yo. http://www.bahaistudies.net/asma/yoism.pdf

 

[Chief Walkin Eagle]

Is this the video where they are 'shocked' to find out the moon actually has some color or the video where they mistake pixelation for airbrushed smudges?

Yes, that being the obvious bullshit of the video (making a big deal of the moons color that is) lol that and claiming an edited photo with the blurred out structure being 10 times the size of LA and the blurred humanoid beside it being 1/10 the size. Are you referring to two videos? Im talking about Moon Rising, thats the one where they chose the stupid main idea to be the color of the moon when there was so much more going on thats far more interesting.

 

[Chief Walkin Eagle]

Hell I'm open minded.. not too gullible though. If you have legit evidence I would like to see it. But don't get mad when I point out flaws in your theory.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilOsZyjRvDs

There it is man, try not to pay much attention about the color part because the moon having color is not a big deal. Also that giant humanoid shit is BS too, just focus on everything else.

 

[Hepheastus420]

You dont consider edited photos as proof of the government trying to hide something? And its true, all 1.8 million of those photos are open to the public. But judging from your strict standards for evidence I dont know if you'll get anything from this video. I posted this video for the skeptics to nit pick and only Heis pointed something out but he pointed out the obvious bullshit and ignored the legit stuff. Doer was pretty interested in the points the video made (Im pretty sure Doer is a skeptic... someone correct me if Im wrong lol).

If the government was trying to hide these pics, why the hell would they release them to the public? I don't have strict standards for evidence, I let the truth flow. If it is real evidence, then it's evidence.. I'm not just gonna say "oh I don't like that so it's not evidence".

And calm down about the whole skeptic thing, they just like proof. What's wrong with that? Do you believe in leprechauns? If so, then you must have smoked some good shit. If not, why? Is it because there's no evidence? Same goes with the great minds of RIU.. alot of claims sound just as believable as leprechauns. At least they ask for evidence instead of getting mad and "forcing" their beliefs on you.

 

[Hepheastus420]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilOsZyjRvDs

There it is man, try not to pay much attention about the color part because the moon having color is not a big deal. Also that giant humanoid shit is BS too, just focus on everything else.

So ignore the stupidity of the video and only listen out for legit evidence of strange stuff happening on the moon.. Rodger dodger

 

[Hepheastus420]

Oh come on man... an hour documentary? Fuck this bro.. shits gonna be a buzz kill. Don't think it's because I dont want to face your "truth" or anything since I've never watched a hour long documentary that anybody on RIU has posted. If you could send me to a few key points in the movie I'll watch them though.

 

[Hepheastus420]

16 minutes in : Not gonna lie, some of the craters on the moon look like strange giant objects. But images can be mistaken. I mean how do we know that those so called "objects" aren't just craters with shadows lining up at the perfect angles creating an illusion? Some of those pictures showed large standing objects too. Has NASA denied that there are large standing craters? Because I'm pretty sure that's what they are. I wish these guys could get better proof than some pictures that are most likely mistaken as being photos of E.T. shit. IDK though.

 

[Chief Walkin Eagle]

Oh come on man... an hour documentary? Fuck this bro.. shits gonna be a buzz kill. Don't think it's because I dont want to face your "truth" or anything since I've never watched a hour long documentary that anybody on RIU has posted. If you could send me to a few key points in the movie I'll watch them though.

Im too lazy to skim through it and find key points lol It is kind of a buzzkill because its anti-climatic and the focus is on stupid coloring of the moon. The main points are basically numerous edited photos of the moon, photos taken by astronauts that have the many crosshairs visible on land but not on the black horizon when a lot of the photos have the crosshairs clearly visible on the on the horizon, IOW more editing to hide something. The most famous photo taken of the Earth from the moon is edited by placing the earth on a black background with no stars. A photo taken on the moon of an unmistakable cylindrical structure sicking out of the ground at a angle in the distance. The first submissions of Apollo arm patches drawn by an astronaut that has him drawing Stonehenge on the moon for some reason along with Egyptian symbolism. EVERY single space agency in the world sharing the same "vector" design in their logo, also a anonymous painter from 400 years ago (I think 400) painting a woman with a subtle yet detailed flying saucer in the background, the same "vector" symbolism is apparent in that painting too. Crazy shit being seen in the reflection of astronauts facemasks. And some bald headed dude explaining his extensive research and tracking down an old fart who had something to do with the Apollo missions, saying that the old fart was not afraid of spilling the governments secrets because he was gunna die soon anyways... *takes a breath* god damn, all that typin just to make myself look crazy lol.

 

[mindphuk]

If the government was trying to hide these pics, why the hell would they release them to the public? I don't have strict standards for evidence, I let the truth flow. If it is real evidence, then it's evidence.. I'm not just gonna say "oh I don't like that so it's not evidence".

And calm down about the whole skeptic thing, they just like proof. What's wrong with that? Do you believe in leprechauns? If so, then you must have smoked some good shit. If not, why? Is it because there's no evidence? Same goes with the great minds of RIU.. alot of claims sound just as believable as leprechauns. At least they ask for evidence instead of getting mad and "forcing" their beliefs on you.

Wow dude! I am just floored seeing you make some of the same arguments about skepticism that we were making to you just a few short months ago. You have really put some thought into this, I can tell. You are the poster child for critical thinking so now that any time someone makes the idiotic claim that these discussions about god won't change anyone's mind, I will just say, "What about Hep?"

 

[mindphuk]

...the late Robert McCall was the artist responsible for actually creating the flashes and he recalled that “Jack Schmitt was the geologist astronaut on that mission, and he thought Stonehenge would be a wonderful image to include, one of the first civilizations, as we know civilizations, would be an interesting symbol. So I designed some with Stonehenge as the graphic imagery.”
http://www.eternalidol.com/?p=10504


Not exactly sure why this rejected flash is considered to be some sort of conspiracy. There doesn't appear to be anyone hiding any information and it doesn't appear to imply anything about ancient civilizations anywhere except on Earth.

 

[Chief Walkin Eagle]

If the government was trying to hide these pics, why the hell would they release them to the public? I don't have strict standards for evidence, I let the truth flow. If it is real evidence, then it's evidence.. I'm not just gonna say "oh I don't like that so it's not evidence".

And calm down about the whole skeptic thing, they just like proof. What's wrong with that? Do you believe in leprechauns? If so, then you must have smoked some good shit. If not, why? Is it because there's no evidence? Same goes with the great minds of RIU.. alot of claims sound just as believable as leprechauns. At least they ask for evidence instead of getting mad and "forcing" their beliefs on you.

All I did was mention skeptics, calm down man. You view me as some gullible crazy fool and I view you as an oblivious fish not believing theres life beyond water, nothing is going to change that.

 

[mindphuk]

Ed Current exposes why it is hard to many of these videos and conspiracy tales seriously.

[video=youtube;k8VAsoVuShM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=k8VAsoVuShM[/video]

 

[Zaehet Strife]

Translation- i believe what i want to regardless of the facts... you have ideas that you claim no certainty to and i don't like that.

 

[Chief Walkin Eagle]

...the late Robert McCall was the artist responsible for actually creating the flashes and he recalled that “Jack Schmitt was the geologist astronaut on that mission, and he thought Stonehenge would be a wonderful image to include, one of the first civilizations, as we know civilizations, would be an interesting symbol. So I designed some with Stonehenge as the graphic imagery.”
http://www.eternalidol.com/?p=10504


Not exactly sure why this rejected flash is considered to be some sort of conspiracy. There doesn't appear to be anyone hiding any information and it doesn't appear to imply anything about ancient civilizations anywhere except on Earth.

So for this observation to be true, you were expecting his explanation to be "theres ancient monuments on the moon" ? Of course he had to provide reasons why he chose to use Stonehenge, and if there were monuments on the moon then obviously he wouldnt mention that lol He would make something up.

 

[mindphuk]

So for this observation to be true, you were expecting his explanation to be "theres ancient monuments on the moon" ? Of course he had to provide reasons why he chose to use Stonehenge, and if there were monuments on the moon then obviously he wouldnt mention that lol He would make something up.

So you would prefer to make up some wild speculative premise that there are monuments on the moon rather than take the word of the people involved? That's what I thought.

 

[Hepheastus420]

All I did was mention skeptics, calm down man. You view me as some gullible crazy fool and I view you as an oblivious fish not believing theres life beyond water, nothing is going to change that.

Dude I believe there's a whole lot of life out there in space. I just don't think those pics prove it. Think about how big space is.. Seriously think about it, we aren't just some lucky planet in the pocket of space that got to have life. I don't view you as a gullible crazy fool man.. and gees, didn't think you thought of me that way.