Look up the university research that demonstrates that weed grown with UV has 20%-30% more thc. It's a well known fact, though it may be more accurate to say well established fact, that cannabis plants convert cbg into thc and cbd when exposed to UV.
I personally like and prefer sun systems.
Mirror bounce is much better than hammer finish.
I get what youre saying now ive just read that yield-wise the 315 is more so comparable to like 450w-500w of hps.... and if i had 3 of them on the tray i would get max intensity even if there is some wasted light on the ends, although on each table canopy sticks out like 6 inches on all sides so its more like a 6.5-7' x 4' canopy, but i guess maybe ill try 2 at first and if im not satisfied try 3
lol this is complete bullshit.I have done side by sides and 2 315 w cmh kicks the dog shit out of my 600 hps.that ain't reading no bullshit on the internet that is rwal.life comparisons in my grow house
I told him the exact same thing on another forum
here is 2 315s over a 6x4 that smoked a 1000w HPS that i had 1 room over.i.pulled over 8 zips more under the cmh.this is no bullshit assumption or speculation this was real world fukin science.
And I don't see any long internodes or leafy buds either.
those pic looks sick and i appreciate your posts but your other response is
With the cost of them here For Me. It's like the difference of about $1000 or $1500 so, if
I think you would do well with the 2.really depends on what medium your in and your growing ability.I grow in recirculating DWC and run Co2 so the more light the better.Im sure i could add another bulb in there but i think the extra gain for cost will be so neglible i may not even notice.I think you should start with 2 and see how it goes.If you can afford a 3 bulb setup than roll with 2.Another thing also it depends on your hood.I looked at the Phantom CMH hoods at my local shop and did not see ANY difference except a more consentrated footprint.I have a LUX app on my phone that works pretty damn good.It gives me good points of reference and i was able to compare the shops setup and only saw a more concentrated downward footprint.I was hitting over 60K LUX under his light in about a 2x2 footprint with the Phantom CMH hood.On the outside of the 3x3 you could really see the light tapering off.
I explain all that in my other post,Ambient heat is different than radiant.Plants can tolerate alot more radiant heat but if you have a higher ambiant and your radiant is about the same your plants are gonna fry.I aim for around 42,000 LUX on the outside some spots a little less.You can download a LUX app for a smartphone and it truly is one of my best tools i use in my grow rooms.especially when u have a point of reference.I never burn my plants when i use it.
nevermind that clown.He got called out on another thread for posting a pic that wasnt his claiming he grew it.Was the lowest of lows.Almost as bad as being a fuking rat.
Wasnt talking about you man i was talking about the dude you quoted calm down.The inhibitor posted some pics on another thread that wasnt his.
Well shit, now I really feel like an ass. I've gotten so used to Thai stick, however he spells it, calling me out and talking smack that I finally felt the need to answer what felt like the "throwing the down of the gauntlets". My bad. Now if you'll excuse me I have to go and clean up the mess I just made of this thread.
I wouldn't air cool the 630 de, its not that hot. And if you're trying to get away with less lights and more coverage you'll have to keep the light higher anyway.