Why do detractors constantly fail to argue against policy?

choomer

Well-Known Member
Compulsively exposing your hobbled wit and juvenile insecurities, youre a gullible rube.
That wasn't for you but seems incredibly apropos for it to be applied to you from your response.
I'm sure you meant to do that, riiiiiiiiight?

It's also really good that it's coming from a screen name whose claim to fame is that it also belongs to a homosexual hillbilly rapist from "Pulp Fiction".
I'm sure you meant to do that, riiiiiiiiight?
 

choomer

Well-Known Member
Compulsively exposing your hobbled wit and juvenile insecurities, youre a gullible rube.
Don't you have a more varied repository of insult you could use?
Otherwise it appears you stole what I quoted from someone else because it "looks cool", but you really have no idea what is means.

Variety - it's the spice of life! ;)
 

Heil Tweetler

Well-Known Member
Don't you have a more varied repository of insult you could use?
Otherwise it appears you stole what I quoted from someone else because it "looks cool", but you really have no idea what is means.

Variety - it's the spice of life! ;)
Your wretched doggerel merits only repeated bitch slaps, rube.
 

choomer

Well-Known Member
Cringe, you words thud like donkey turds, asshole.
There is that elan in both the reply and the oh so creatively edited quote!

So if my words are "donkey turds", can't you just keep yourself from consuming them and then not have to reply to my posts while addressing me with the same honorifics you use for your mother and complaining about how they taste?

Be Strong!
Deny the lure of the turd! (unless, of course, you do like the taste and this is just a clever ploy to consume more) ;)
 

Heil Tweetler

Well-Known Member
There is that elan in both the reply and the oh so creatively edited quote!

So if my words are "donkey turds", can't you just keep yourself from consuming them and then not have to reply to my posts while addressing me with the same honorifics you use for your mother and complaining about how they taste?

Be Strong!
Deny the lure of the turd! (unless, of course, you do like the taste and this is just a clever ploy to consume more) ;)
Witless clown, im not stepping in that.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
So Marwan the bridge dweller supports Palestine and also really likes and respects a vocal Trump supporter.

I don't think you support Palestine at all, you just hate Jews. That's why you think the Jews perpetrated the holocaust on themselves. Choomer's only friend...
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
You came with data and I gotta appreciate that you source your data, but let's see if Squeaky is correct.

State welfare exp. federal dep % for gen rev. How much is that? political alignment for 2014

1. California - $103 Billion 26% $103B*.26= $26.78B D

2. New York - $61.4 Billion 32.8% $61.4B*.328=$20.1B D

3. Texas - $35.4 Billion 31.8% $35.4B*.318=$11.2B R

4. Florida - $27.2 Billion 33.2% $27.2B*.332=$9B D

5. Pennsylvania - $26.7 Billion 30.8% $26.7B*.308=$8.2B D

6. Illinois - $21 Billion 26.8% $21B*.268=$5.6B D

7. Ohio - $20 Billion 35% $20B*.35=$7B D

8. Massachusetts - $18.6 Billion 27.8% $18.6*.278=$5.1B D

9. New Jersey - $17.3 Billion 27.3% $17.3B*.273=$4.7B D

10. Michigan - $16.3 Billion 32.3% $16.3*.323=$5.26B D

and for fun comparison the most dependent on federal aid:

11. Mississippi $5.8 Billion 40.1% $5.8*.401=$2.32B R

<political alignment map for 2014 courtesy of http://www.peteradz.com/2014/2014-red-blue-political-map-usa>

As you can see, a higher percentage of subsidization DOES NOT MEAN more money from the federal gov't, aka "drain".

Try again? ;)
You came with data and I gotta appreciate that you source your data, but let's see if Squeaky is correct.

State welfare exp. federal dep % for gen rev. How much is that? political alignment for 2014

1. California - $103 Billion 26% $103B*.26= $26.78B D

2. New York - $61.4 Billion 32.8% $61.4B*.328=$20.1B D

3. Texas - $35.4 Billion 31.8% $35.4B*.318=$11.2B R

4. Florida - $27.2 Billion 33.2% $27.2B*.332=$9B D

5. Pennsylvania - $26.7 Billion 30.8% $26.7B*.308=$8.2B D

6. Illinois - $21 Billion 26.8% $21B*.268=$5.6B D

7. Ohio - $20 Billion 35% $20B*.35=$7B D

8. Massachusetts - $18.6 Billion 27.8% $18.6*.278=$5.1B D

9. New Jersey - $17.3 Billion 27.3% $17.3B*.273=$4.7B D

10. Michigan - $16.3 Billion 32.3% $16.3*.323=$5.26B D

and for fun comparison the most dependent on federal aid:

11. Mississippi $5.8 Billion 40.1% $5.8*.401=$2.32B R

<political alignment map for 2014 courtesy of http://www.peteradz.com/2014/2014-red-blue-political-map-usa>

As you can see, a higher percentage of subsidization DOES NOT MEAN more money from the federal gov't, aka "drain".

Try again? ;)
yeah youve done that around the wrong way

in california the 103 billion is 26% of the general revenue that comes in from taxes and stuff so they collect 396.153 billion in taxes for every 103 billion they get in federal subsides

new york collects 187.195 billion in taxes for every 61.4billion they get in federal subsides 32.8%

mississipi collects 14.46 billion in taxes for every 5.8 billion they get in subsides 40.1%



the blue states put in a much higher percentage of what they earn/collect in taxes into the pot than the red states do
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
yeah youve done that around the wrong way

in california the 103 billion is 26% of the general revenue that comes in from taxes and stuff so they collect 396.153 billion in taxes for every 103 billion they get in federal subsides

new york collects 187.195 billion in taxes for every 61.4billion they get in federal subsides 32.8%

mississipi collects 14.46 billion in taxes for every 5.8 billion they get in subsides 40.1%



the blue states put in a much higher percentage of what they earn/collect in taxes into the pot than the red states do
I was going to try explain it to him but he seems pretty hopeless.
 

PCXV

Well-Known Member
You came with data and I gotta appreciate that you source your data, but let's see if Squeaky is correct.

State welfare exp. federal dep % for gen rev. How much is that? political alignment for 2014

1. California - $103 Billion 26% $103B*.26= $26.78B D

2. New York - $61.4 Billion 32.8% $61.4B*.328=$20.1B D

3. Texas - $35.4 Billion 31.8% $35.4B*.318=$11.2B R

4. Florida - $27.2 Billion 33.2% $27.2B*.332=$9B D

5. Pennsylvania - $26.7 Billion 30.8% $26.7B*.308=$8.2B D

6. Illinois - $21 Billion 26.8% $21B*.268=$5.6B D

7. Ohio - $20 Billion 35% $20B*.35=$7B D

8. Massachusetts - $18.6 Billion 27.8% $18.6*.278=$5.1B D

9. New Jersey - $17.3 Billion 27.3% $17.3B*.273=$4.7B D

10. Michigan - $16.3 Billion 32.3% $16.3*.323=$5.26B D

and for fun comparison the most dependent on federal aid:

11. Mississippi $5.8 Billion 40.1% $5.8*.401=$2.32B R

<political alignment map for 2014 courtesy of http://www.peteradz.com/2014/2014-red-blue-political-map-usa>

As you can see, a higher percentage of subsidization DOES NOT MEAN more money from the federal gov't, aka "drain".

Try again? ;)
You've just proven your first assertion incorrect. How much does California pay out compared to how much it recieves from the federal government? New York? Texas? It makes sense that big cities or large economies will socialize to make living conditions better in such limited space.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
You've just proven your first assertion incorrect. How much does California pay out compared to how much it recieves from the federal government? New York? Texas? It makes sense that big cities or large economies will socialize to make living conditions better in such limited space.
And that takes tax revenue. Funny how the tax bill eliminates the Federal deduction for state taxes. Almost seems deliberately targeted, doesn't it?
bongsmilie
 
Top