9/11 Poll Yes, No, And Maybe So

Was 9/11 An Inside Job


  • Total voters
    43

The Warlord

Well-Known Member
It's just a heavy handed propaganda ploy by the hard left to deflect the blame and continue their misguided agendas of foreign policy, which will inevitably mean a Republican president will have to step in and clean up the mess, and get the blame....again.
Ya, most likely.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
They don't want to accept the responsibility of a failed Clinton foreign policy bringing this perdition upon us. It has to be the Govt. :roll: The gullible believe the spin, but the spinners know darn well it deflects away from their political leanings, which brought the mess to our door. :wink:

Obama is showing the exact same weakness in judgement.
 

jrh72582

Well-Known Member
People hate to face facts. 8 years of appeasement and bad foreign policy from Clinton produced 9/11.... there is an easy pattern to follow of a buildup of nerve and ambition within Al Queda. Each appeasement or non response from Clinton ratcheted up the ante for the next attack.

The ppl that spin these conspiracies are left wingers who want to tilt the blame away from their parties ideas, which really caused all this mess. Those films are not about telling the truth, they are about deflecting you from the REAL truth.....which harms their aspirations of power.

Keep watching the films..... they have stolen your wallet as you eat the propaganda popcorn.

Bullshit. The Clinton administration knew all about Al Qaeda and Osama Bin Laden. In fact, they briefed Bush on him specifically during the change in regimes. It made the news and all that jazz. Bush was made well aware and they tracked Osama the first 8 months of the administration. They knew an attack was eminent and it had nothing to do with Clinton's foreign policy. It's well understood that Al Qaeda's plot is in no way logically connected to BC's policies. If anything, Bush should have pursued the matter more aggressively himself, but he didn't.

And you talk about the deceptive nature of news when your very argument to which I'm responding is directly from Alex Jones' conspiracy nut job site.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
They knew about them? No one denies that..... Clinton did NOTHING about them!! Therein lies the problem. At the same time he was gutting the CIA, he ignored all the small attacks all over the globe. Clinton's INSISTING to declare the first WWT bombing an ordinary crime was a HUGE mistake.

8 years of watching the build up. Three direct requests to take out Osama by the CIA... DENIED!!

Clinton has blood on his hands... lots of it.
 

jrh72582

Well-Known Member
They knew about them? No one denies that..... Clinton did NOTHING about them!! Therein lies the problem. At the same time he was gutting the CIA, he ignored all the small attacks all over the globe. Clinton's INSISTING to declare the first WWT bombing an ordinary crime was a HUGE mistake.

8 years of watching the build up. Three direct requests to take out Osama by the CIA... DENIED!!

Clinton has blood on his hands... lots of it.

So does Alex Jones handle all of your thinking now? I'm disappointed.

Here's a thorough article on this issue. I have MANY others...

http://www.redorbit.com/news/general/47649/911_panel_cites_clinton_and_bush_inaction/
 

CrackerJax

New Member
So you think a President who has been in office 8 months is responsible for 8 years of appeasement foreign policy?

Almost all of the intelligence about Al Queda came from the fractured CIA years during Clinton's administration.

All Clinton had to do was give the green light all those years ago and Osama would have been neutralized.... end of story. But Clinton got cold feet....each time, and we finally had to pay the price for his overseas weakness.

Obama is walking us down that very same road today.
 

jrh72582

Well-Known Member
So you think a President who has been in office 8 months is responsible for 8 years of appeasement foreign policy?

Almost all of the intelligence about Al Queda came from the fractured CIA years during Clinton's administration.

All Clinton had to do was give the green light all those years ago and Osama would have been neutralized.... end of story. But Clinton got cold feet....each time, and we finally had to pay the price for his overseas weakness.

Obama is walking us down that very same road today.
He pursued the matter diplomatically until Yemen and it became a priority for him. At that time, Bill was said to be obsessed with Osama and made it public (partly as a distraction for the Lewinski ordeal). He made very clear that Osama was the number 1 problem plaguing Bush. However, Rice dismissed their advice and focused elsewhere. Clinton handled the situation well, considering the threat level early on. You act as though he KNEW Al Qaeda was up to something, but he didn't. After Yemen, he did and acted appropriately. Bush was warned and did very little to keep him in check. Very little. However, no one is to blame except for Osama and Al Qaeda. You blame Clinton for the fact that it happened - wow! Hindsight is always better than foresight. Both presidents had no foresight into the scope of what would happen. You criticize them only with the safety of hindsight. A different story my friend.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
He became our number one problem because Bill refused to deal with him.

there were opportunities to get rid of him. Clinton balked. When the USS Cole was attacked, the gloves should have come off.... instantly...but alas, no. This only emboldens your enemies.

Bush inherited a foreign policy nightmare and a strained and depleted intelligence network.

He fixed both.
 

jrh72582

Well-Known Member
He became our number one problem because Bill refused to deal with him.

there were opportunities to get rid of him. Clinton balked. When the USS Cole was attacked, the gloves should have come off.... instantly...but alas, no. This only emboldens your enemies.

Bush inherited a foreign policy nightmare and a strained and depleted intelligence network.

He fixed both.

Now I know you're joking. Wait, have you been joking this whole time?

You're really not an Alex Jones automaton?
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
My kool aid is freedom of choice brought about by my own hard work and good decisions. Not everyone can drink it I guess. Then they vote for a guy like Obama.
I'm not willing to sacrifice a freedom for a hand out.... you are.
Yeah right ... we all know what your "good decisions" were. They make you look like an asshole, but so what?
Bullshit ... you are more than willing to give up your freedom so your government can protect you from all those terrorists! LOOK THERE'S ONE BEHIND YOU RIGHT NOW! Bwaa ha ha ha ... you're a fucking hypocrite!

The ppl that spin these conspiracies are left wingers who want to tilt the blame away from their parties ideas, which really caused all this mess.
Blowing shit out your ass again ... you haven't a clue who the people are who want the truth. This statement proves just how stupid you truly are.kiss-ass

Those films are not about telling the truth, they are about deflecting you from the REAL truth.....which harms their aspirations of power.
Says the dummy that can back NONE of the shit he spews:spew:

Keep watching the films..... they have stolen your wallet as you eat the propaganda popcorn.
Any one reading these threads spend a dime on any of the 911 documentary they have see? If so help this :dunce: out. He's desperate to believe we pay for this stuff.:-|


There is about a 0.0000000000000000000000001 chance that 9/11 was an inside job. If you believe it was you'll believe anything. The government does some messed up stuff but not the tower attacks.
We'd love to hear how you came to that conclusion ... especially with all the concrete evidence that those building were demo. If you believe those building came down due to fire and plane impact it is you that will believe anything. There is tons of evidence they did ... and nothing to prove that they didn't. :sleep:
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Yeah right ... we all know what your "good decisions" were. They make you look like an asshole, but so what?
Please, tell me...what were my decisions?

Bullshit ... you are more than willing to give up your freedom so your government can protect you from all those terrorists! LOOK THERE'S ONE BEHIND YOU RIGHT NOW! Bwaa ha ha ha ... you're a fucking hypocrite!
I have felt NO loss of freedom from the patriot Act. i am not a terrorist and I don't have to worry about ppl listening to my overseas calls, since they are innocent enough...mostly financial. If you are feeling a loss, you are probably up to no good. There is a difference of having to make adjustments so planes don't fly into buildings as opposed to having the Obama Administration take over my personal decisions in life in exchange for mediocrity.

Heh, I can tell by your demeanor, that I am affecting you. i guess that's how ppl on the fringe must behave.... :lol:


Any one reading these threads spend a dime on any of the 911 documentary they have see? If so help this :dunce: out. He's desperate to believe we pay for this stuff.:-|
I didn't say you paid, but if you don't think the authors are raking in the do-re-me- with that drivel....you are ... well...not bright.



I'll say it again...bring all of your "hard" evidence to Soto... she'll listen to you. :mrgreen:

America can only believe so much nonsense, and right now, we are pretty full up with Obama. If he is truly your guy...(??)... this kind of nuttiness will not help him. It makes him look nutty, and he's doesn't need any more help in that regard.
 
Top