A is for Arrogance, B is for Baloney

February 24, 2007 A is for Arrogance, B is for Baloney

By Pamela Meister[FONT=tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif]
arrogance (n): [/FONT][FONT=tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif]offensive display of superiority or self-importance; overbearing pride.[/FONT]

[FONT=times new roman,times]During a recent campaign stop in Florida, Democrat presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton made the following [/FONT][FONT=times new roman,times]promise[/FONT][FONT=times new roman,times]:[/FONT][FONT=times new roman,times]The implication that President Bush is arrogant is somewhat ironic when it comes from the woman who said (while husband Bill occupied the Oval Office), [/FONT][FONT=times new roman,times]Unfortunately, Hillary's attitude is not at all unusual these days on the American Left. While abroad, John Kerry said America has become an "international pariah." Ted Kennedy believes that our fight against terror has "left America more and more isolated in the world." According to John Edwards, America can only regain its moral authority by "acknowledging when we 've made mistakes or been proven wrong." And writing for the Washington Post, Richard Cohen [/FONT][FONT=times new roman,times]said[/FONT][FONT=times new roman,times],[/FONT][FONT=times new roman,times]When you were growing up, how many times did your parents tell you not to worry about what others thought? To do what was right for you, even if it went against what the popular kids considered to be cool? Too many of our elected officials seem to have forgotten this simple homespun lesson. Their political outlook mirrors the social outlook we were all forced to endure in high school: if you didn't look, dress or act in a certain way, you just weren't accepted by the self-anointed elites. Even if you did, admittance to the inner circle was not guaranteed. [/FONT]

[FONT=times new roman,times]Should Americans look to the self-anointed global elites for guidance when it comes to our foreign policy?[/FONT]

[FONT=times new roman,times]Writing in American Thinker, Kyle-Anne Shiver [/FONT][FONT=times new roman,times]relates[/FONT][FONT=times new roman,times] this tale:[/FONT][FONT=times new roman,times]Another good rejoinder might have been to ask why Europe didn't pay more heed to American interests before starting two terrible wars that involved the much of the world. Neither World War I nor World War II were picnics, and it certainly would have been nice if someone in charge somewhere had asked what America thought beforehand. But most Americans are realistic. They don' t expect France, Germany, or any other country to play "Mother, may I? " with us when they make their foreign policy decisions. Alliances come and go depending on the needs of the day, but the reality is that it has always been every man for himself, and it always will be. [/FONT]

[FONT=times new roman,times]George Bush famously said, [/FONT][FONT=times new roman,times]And as far as our security goes, he has done just that. Unlike his predecessor, who licked his finger and held it up to the wind before making important policy decisions, Bush has been steadfast in his belief that the safety of American citizens takes precedence over the good opinion of the world's chattering classes. After all, he was not elected by world citizens, but by American citizens. In the end, our president is only accountable to us. Not to the French politician who considers the atrocity of 9/11 to be a mere [/FONT][FONT=times new roman,times]"incident"[/FONT][FONT=times new roman,times] in history. Not to the U.N., a bloated bureaucracy that has no problem giving Cuba a seat on its Human Rights Council. And certainly not to the angry Brit whom Kyle-Anne Shiver had the misfortune to come across. [/FONT]

[FONT=times new roman,times]It is amazing how all discussion of American arrogance ceases when some kind of disaster occurs somewhere in the world. Then, instead of berating us, the world entreats us to send money, troops, and other types of humanitarian aid to victims of tsunamis, earthquakes, and so on. It is certainly tempting to say "no." After all, being the world 's whipping boy gets a bit tiresome, especially when the whipping boy is expected to extend non-refundable loans in addition to his posterior. But of course we do, because it's part and parcel of who we are. [/FONT]

[FONT=times new roman,times]Doing what is right for American sovereignty may be considered to be arrogant by outsiders and those of us who worry constantly about winning Miss Congeniality in the beauty pageant of life. But the rest of us should not be afraid to stand up for our selves. As George Will said, [/FONT][FONT=times new roman,times]Class dismissed.
American Thinker: A is for Arrogance, B is for Baloney
[/FONT]

Great article, Wavels ...

I'd say that the definition of arrogance would be the thinking of those Middle Eastern guys who hijacked the four planes on 9-11, and did their dastardly deeds with the thought, and the thoughts of their followers, that we wouldn't strike back.

Vi

Hey med......[FONT=times new roman,times]When you were growing up, how many times did your parents tell you not to worry about what others thought? To do what was right for you, even if it went against what the popular kids considered to be cool?[/FONT]