All You Need To Know About Marijuana Legalization In Canada

Egzoset

Well-Known Member
Hi again!

Ain't that pityful (and boring) enough that there's got to be so much obstructive FLOODING tolerated for the sake of spineless gang-bashers who's "bites" are reminders of an animal reacting in fear someone might steal its food?

How is teeth display and growls worth any serious attention?!

...

M'well, the type of reader i post for may still appreciate some more clarifications relative to Canuck self-serving political agendas vs the LP's "medical" mari-caca (selling with "organized crime" price tags attached already)...

Actually i'll go as far as to bet very few of us ever saw it coming: Joy Davies!...


:clap:
Too bad for MiniHarper it turns out her politically-embarrassing (yet still quite valid) pro-cannabic stand became a major (but short-lived) nuisance not long before elections day (and Trudeau was very well aware where she came from!):

« Governments need to allow us our dignity as human beings... »
« There is no science that shows harm in cannabis. »

Then i gather she made a strategic mistake relatively his hidden plan(s) when refering to alternative sources of cannabic science again, with interpretations unfit for mass communications at the time perhaps - for example:


TWB:
Living In A Home Where Cannabis Is Grown Doesn’t Harm A Child’s Health (2013-Oct-17)


(Copied from TheJointBlog.Com)

A study published earlier this year by the government-funded National Institute of Health, as well as the International Journal of Drug Policy, found that ”there was no significant difference between the health of the children living in cannabis grow operations and the comparison group of children”.

These findings, according to researchers, “challenge contemporary child welfare approaches and have implications for both child protection social workers and the policymakers who develop frameworks for practice.”


Under current law, children are constantly taken away from their parents for growing cannabis – even if the parents are qualified patients under state law – something that this study shows makes little sense, given that a child’s health is unaffected; however, no one can legitimately argue that it doesn’t harm a child’s health and well-being to be unexpectedly removed (sometimes for years, or even permanently) from their parents.

Here’s the method that researchers used to come to their conclusion:

The study examined the household, family and individual characteristics of 181 children found living in cannabis grow operations in two regions in British Columbia, Canada. Data was collected on-site on the physical characteristics of the homes, the health characteristics of the children, and their prescription drug history. Comparison of prescription drug use was also made with a group of children from the same geographic areas.

The study was conducted by researchers at the School of Social Work at the University of British Columbia.

More exactly here's what finaly triggered this questionable/opportunist rejection trying to conserve bigot votes:

[ https://www.facebook.com/joydavieswhiterock/posts/379006132215034 ]
Joy Davies, 2013-Apr-21

Here is a link to Mom's and Dad's for marijuana website. Such an important message to share. There is NO HARM in our children being in a home where cannabis is growing. The fact that law enforcement and government rip children out of the arms of their parents that grow pot is the HARM. This MUST STOP!!! Did you know that a Canadian 10 year old boy visiting his step dad in Oregon was kidnapped by the Oregon government and place in Oregon foster homes for 2 years because his Canadian mom was a pot activist. Once they finally returned him... NO THANKS to our Canadian Conservative Harper government who did not bring him home... the State of Oregon billed the mom $30,000 for taking care of her son. HELLOO!!!!??? How do we stop the disconnect??? http://dads4marijuana.webs.com/
M'well, in light of this i shall add yet another item of my own selection:

Nature: Prenatal exposure to recreational drugs affects global motion perception in preschool children (2016-Nov-19)

« ...global motion perception was improved by marijuana exposure... »

« ...marijuana reduced the negative effect of alcohol exposure... »


Chakraborty, A. et al. Prenatal exposure to recreational drugs affects global motion perception in preschool children. Sci. Rep. 5, 16921; doi: 10.1038/srep16921 (2015).
Now it sure makes sense why USA patented CBD in cannabis, etc...

:leaf:

With traditional media remaining obviously biased while thriving on sensationalism!
:cuss:

But then one might ask how coherent was it for Justin SuperPéteux Trudeau to claim he'd « legalize & regulate » while his political party promptly declared that this « in no way reflect the values or policies » of a Liberal after they claimed to be focussed on scientific reasoning so much? Euh...

Values? As those shared after refering to a legitimate scientific study published in Nature?... Doesn't that sound like double-standards somehow, depending on who picks them?!... Which by the way reminds me i forgot to emphasize the simple fact that Didier Jutras-Aswald (invited to the recent "scientific" Montréal gathering) was actually sponsored by Pfizer in 2013 to synthesize a study on his own set of chosen studies: e.g. a study on studies!...

Going back in time i still find it was pure bigot provocation to name Marc Garneau as Transport minister knowing about his authentic scientific background (he went to space - and came back), euh... Or maybe the Liberals couldn't take the slightest (mediatic) chances with him eventually seeing any of those alledged "scientific" papers directly inherited from the Harper era!!

:dunce:

In addition, does a "doctor" title auto-magically make one a proven "scientific" as well?? ... See what i mean?...

:wall:

In conclusion this incident may happen to have ramifications way beyond the hypothetical "protection" by predators of Canadian children on planet Itnoc. Directly ahead some of us are expecting the reform of 2017 to contain many more Troy Horses, like kidnapings the American way, for example. Self-serving Civil Asset Forfeiture laws, etc., etc.

The pieces start falling in place once put into perspective with all other past events IMHO! o_O

Any Cannuck "stoner" couples waiting for a newborn baby lately?... :o

Good day, have fun!! :peace:
 

OLD MOTHER SATIVA

Well-Known Member
You really are a fucking idiot, aren't you. Ever notice that you take the side of every troll, conspiracy theorist and anti-goverment whack-job who posts on here? I didn't jump on anyone until they jumped at me first. Unlike what you just did. Need help finding your ignore button, fool? Thank you for going back to the LED forum...you havin' a big discussion over there about how the Liberals are going to make grow lights illegal? Or are you too busy telling others what they are permitted to post? If you're involved in the conversation, I'm sure it's riveting.
Vianna= big [foul] mouth ..attempted bully..lol

you are welcome.. ..ignore button on
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
Vianna= big [foul] mouth ..attempted bully..lol

you are welcome.. ..ignore button on
OMS= Brain dead troll. What exactly is an attempted bully? I've been around for more than 50 years...never heard that term before. Is there a club I can join? Maybe folks should wander over to some of the other sections you post on and see who is the confirmed bully. You just can't accept that others don't take everything you say as fact, seems you have a real problem engaging in productive conversations with nearly EVERYONE. Why is that, troll?
 

CalyxCrusher

Well-Known Member
Hi again!

Ain't that pityful (and boring) enough that there's got to be so much obstructive FLOODING tolerated for the sake of spineless gang-bashers who's "bites" are reminders of an animal reacting in fear someone might steal its food?

How is teeth display and growls worth any serious attention?!

...

M'well, the type of reader i post for may still appreciate some more clarifications relative to Canuck self-serving political agendas vs the LP's "medical" mari-caca (selling with "organized crime" price tags attached already)...

Actually i'll go as far as to bet very few of us ever saw it coming: Joy Davies!...


:clap:
Too bad for MiniHarper it turns out her politically-embarrassing (yet still quite valid) pro-cannabic stand became a major (but short-lived) nuisance not long before elections day (and Trudeau was very well aware where she came from!):

« Governments need to allow us our dignity as human beings... »
« There is no science that shows harm in cannabis. »

Then i gather she made a strategic mistake relatively his hidden plan(s) when refering to alternative sources of cannabic science again, with interpretations unfit for mass communications at the time perhaps - for example:


TWB:
Living In A Home Where Cannabis Is Grown Doesn’t Harm A Child’s Health (2013-Oct-17)


(Copied from TheJointBlog.Com)

A study published earlier this year by the government-funded National Institute of Health, as well as the International Journal of Drug Policy, found that ”there was no significant difference between the health of the children living in cannabis grow operations and the comparison group of children”.

These findings, according to researchers, “challenge contemporary child welfare approaches and have implications for both child protection social workers and the policymakers who develop frameworks for practice.”


Under current law, children are constantly taken away from their parents for growing cannabis – even if the parents are qualified patients under state law – something that this study shows makes little sense, given that a child’s health is unaffected; however, no one can legitimately argue that it doesn’t harm a child’s health and well-being to be unexpectedly removed (sometimes for years, or even permanently) from their parents.

Here’s the method that researchers used to come to their conclusion:

The study examined the household, family and individual characteristics of 181 children found living in cannabis grow operations in two regions in British Columbia, Canada. Data was collected on-site on the physical characteristics of the homes, the health characteristics of the children, and their prescription drug history. Comparison of prescription drug use was also made with a group of children from the same geographic areas.

The study was conducted by researchers at the School of Social Work at the University of British Columbia.

More exactly here's what finaly triggered this questionable/opportunist rejection trying to conserve bigot votes:

[ https://www.facebook.com/joydavieswhiterock/posts/379006132215034 ]
Joy Davies, 2013-Apr-21

Here is a link to Mom's and Dad's for marijuana website. Such an important message to share. There is NO HARM in our children being in a home where cannabis is growing. The fact that law enforcement and government rip children out of the arms of their parents that grow pot is the HARM. This MUST STOP!!! Did you know that a Canadian 10 year old boy visiting his step dad in Oregon was kidnapped by the Oregon government and place in Oregon foster homes for 2 years because his Canadian mom was a pot activist. Once they finally returned him... NO THANKS to our Canadian Conservative Harper government who did not bring him home... the State of Oregon billed the mom $30,000 for taking care of her son. HELLOO!!!!??? How do we stop the disconnect??? http://dads4marijuana.webs.com/
M'well, in light of this i shall add yet another item of my own selection:

Nature: Prenatal exposure to recreational drugs affects global motion perception in preschool children (2016-Nov-19)

« ...global motion perception was improved by marijuana exposure... »

« ...marijuana reduced the negative effect of alcohol exposure... »


Chakraborty, A. et al. Prenatal exposure to recreational drugs affects global motion perception in preschool children. Sci. Rep. 5, 16921; doi: 10.1038/srep16921 (2015).
Now it sure makes sense why USA patented CBD in cannabis, etc...

:leaf:

With traditional media remaining obviously biased while thriving on sensationalism!
:cuss:

But then one might ask how coherent was it for Justin SuperPéteux Trudeau to claim he'd « legalize & regulate » while his political party promptly declared that this « in no way reflect the values or policies » of a Liberal after they claimed to be focussed on scientific reasoning so much? Euh...

Values? As those shared after refering to a legitimate scientific study published in Nature?... Doesn't that sound like double-standards somehow, depending on who picks them?!... Which by the way reminds me i forgot to emphasize the simple fact that Didier Jutras-Aswald (invited to the recent "scientific" Montréal gathering) was actually sponsored by Pfizer in 2013 to synthesize a study on his own set of chosen studies: e.g. a study on studies!...

Going back in time i still find it was pure bigot provocation to name Marc Garneau as Transport minister knowing about his authentic scientific background (he went to space - and came back), euh... Or maybe the Liberals couldn't take the slightest (mediatic) chances with him eventually seeing any of those alledged "scientific" papers directly inherited from the Harper era!!

:dunce:

In addition, does a "doctor" title auto-magically make one a proven "scientific" as well?? ... See what i mean?...

:wall:

In conclusion this incident may happen to have ramifications way beyond the hypothetical "protection" by predators of Canadian children on planet Itnoc. Directly ahead some of us are expecting the reform of 2017 to contain many more Troy Horses, like kidnapings the American way, for example. Self-serving Civil Asset Forfeiture laws, etc., etc.

The pieces start falling in place once put into perspective with all other past events IMHO! o_O

Any Cannuck "stoner" couples waiting for a newborn baby lately?... :o

Good day, have fun!! :peace:
Gotta love how this troll keeps wasting his time unoriginally copy and pasting like hes gonna change the world, let alone a single mind. Hard to do when people have ya on ignore, fucken amateur hour
 

Egzoset

Well-Known Member
Hi there!

...ignore button on
Ideed, it's nothing else but a waste of time, resources & energy no matter what, simply because those are self-serving individuals, just like MiniPET: can't shine without the shadow of those they depend/pray on! Now imagine how real persons get abused by such deliquent/criminal irresponsible minds when making a "deal"! Heavy metals in excess, etc.; lead is particularily harmful for young brains, obviously... Or is that what happens after consuming crack!

:confused:

...

Now, back to our announced line of topic, euh...

Lets see, ah yes. The science of bigot anti-cannabic (and predatory!) prohibitioni$ts on a mission...
I believe that's where Janey Canuck found her inspiration which then echoed through her own despicable 1922 book that was even made available at the League of Nations library as "reference" as i recall (!), thanks to her ties with a disconnected "elite" - plus thick bovine skin and a big mouth to match... Déjà vu! Almost a century later nothing has changed significantly in this country of the Commonwealth:

« Clairement pour moi, de changer le statut légal du cannabis sans prendre en considération les données scientifiques qu'on a, pis sans mettre en place des politiques de santé publique qui sont extrêmement solides, euh... à mon avis c'est d'faire fausse route et c'est d'faire une grave erreur. »

As spoken by Didier Jutras-Aswad during the Montréal gathering... :wall:
This one is a typical sample of our so-called "scientific" minds at work, saying we should NOT remove cannabis from the "schedule" because of a lack of evidence, essentially. Which means there was none to support Henri-Sévérin Béland when he silently transfered a Provincial competence to Ottawa in the 1st place...

All of this while Didier is prepared to milk the CBD file, in the name of children on planet Itnoc!... Ka-Ching!! Ka-Ching!!

o_O

But don't count on our parasitic audience to raise such a valid and most relevant point only a few months from the "LEGALEEZATION" reform of 2017! Not to mention i sincerely doubt the lobotomized fans of cap'tain Cannada are even Canadian for real...

By the way, remember this?
...

So, you can rest assured Justin still plans to force "stoners"/"droÿés" to show their ID cards all right!...


SRC: Tout le monde en parle (2014-Feb-23)

Lepage: "Donc vous voulez nationaliser?"
Trudeau: "Non, on veut réguler et contrôler pour que les gens doivent montrer les cartes d'identité..."
More than ever! Meanwhile the arms lobby continues to have it their way, etc, etc...

Good day, have fun!! :peace:
 
Last edited:

cannadan

Well-Known Member
I grew up on the great ones side......Bobby Orr....
always was and always will be the Great One...
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
I stopped watching the NHL almost a decade ago...got tired of having to sit through strikes and lockouts with millionaires suing billionaires for more money. They obviously don't need my money...if I want to see a hockey game, I go and support the local kids.
 
Top