Club 315w lec

Bad Karma · May 18, 2017

MichiganMedGrower said:
Glad to hear that but I am having the opposite experience at the moment. Hey sent me the wrong tent almost a month ago and I asked for a return label to simply be mailed out to me as I don't have a printer to print the shipping label and live far from town.

I finally called and emailed enough and got the label in the mail 2 days ago. They did not return my emails.

It will be 6 weeks before I see the tent I ordered.

The zipper has been broke on the old one all this time. Very frustrating.

And when I asked them to put a rush on my return and I would pay for the new tent and wait for the credit on the old one.

The manager said no to fast shipping as their "margins" are too tight.

Not happy with this order this time at all.

Wow, I'm literally shocked to read this. They've always over performed when I needed any help with a product defect or an order showing up damaged. Like on this most recent issue with my ballast going tits up, they weren't really obligated to give me a new bulb in the deal, but they did anyways.
I hope you get a fully functional new replacement tent asap. I wonder if your email was getting caught in their spam folder or something? They typically email me back with an hour during weekday business hours.

ttystikk · May 18, 2017

Bad Karma said:
Wow, I'm literally shocked to read this. They've always over performed when I needed any help with a product defect or an order showing up damaged. Like on this most recent issue with my ballast going tits up, they weren't really obligated to give me a new bulb in the deal, but they did anyways.
I hope you get a fully functional new replacement tent asap. I wonder if your email was getting caught in their spam folder or something? They typically email me back with an hour during weekday business hours.

I've always had good luck with growers house. The guys know their shit, stand behind the product and when stuff has been damaged in shipping they've been very good about getting it taken care of.

gr865 · May 18, 2017

ttystikk said:
I've always had good luck with growers house. The guys know their shit, stand behind the product and when stuff has been damaged in shipping they've been very good about getting it taken care of.

I have never had any problems with them, they replaced a light two times, paid for returns.

GR

MichiganMedGrower · May 18, 2017

Bad Karma said:
Wow, I'm literally shocked to read this. They've always over performed when I needed any help with a product defect or an order showing up damaged. Like on this most recent issue with my ballast going tits up, they weren't really obligated to give me a new bulb in the deal, but they did anyways.
I hope you get a fully functional new replacement tent asap. I wonder if your email was getting caught in their spam folder or something? They typically email me back with an hour during weekday business hours.

It's the first problem I have had. But it was the rep that dropped the ball.

If I had called sooner rather than emailed the same rep back it would have been taken care of.

Shit happens. Just sharing my recent experience. I want to add that the sale price on the tent was really low.

I will still use growers house for sure.

Pig4buzz · May 19, 2017

Nice fat colas under 315. Learning how to grow lol!
Chronicxnl n goldenglue

Javadog · May 22, 2017

Nice work!

davidcup · May 23, 2017

Hello

Im spanish, sorry for me English

How much harvest is possible with 315W LEC? In other forums I have seen harvests of 350-450 gr, It´s true?

Regards from Spain

MichiganMedGrower · May 23, 2017

davidcup said:
Hello

Im spanish, sorry for me English

How much harvest is possible with 315W LEC? In other forums I have seen harvests of 350-450 gr, It´s true?

Regards from Spain

Yes. With the right grower and the right genetics it is possible.

davidcup · May 23, 2017

MichiganMedGrower said:
Yes. With the right grower and the right genetics it is possible.

OK, 600W HPS will always produce more harvest than 315W LEC? Same conditions

Thanks you ;-)

gr865 · May 23, 2017

It is said that the 315's will put out about the same as a 500W HPS, and is a cooler lamp, very bright.

MichiganMedGrower · May 23, 2017

davidcup said:
OK, 600W HPS will always produce more harvest than 315W LEC? Same conditions

Thanks you

I didn't say it wouldn't. I have gotten 24 oz dry nugs under my 600. I like the 315 as a supplemental lamp.

I actually just pulled it from the flower room to try it in veg.

MichiganMedGrower · May 23, 2017

gr865 said:
It is said that the 315's will put out about the same as a 500W HPS, and is a cooler lamp, very bright.

I am going to say closer to 400. We have to admit there is much hype.

gr865 · May 23, 2017

MichiganMedGrower said:
I am going to say closer to 400. We have to admit there is much hype.

And where did you come up with that number?
I ran a 400W HPS and there is no comparison.
Please show me data!
GR

ttystikk · May 23, 2017

gr865 said:
And where did you come up with that number?
I ran a 400W HPS and there is no comparison.
Please show me data!
GR

From me, among other places.

Javadog · May 23, 2017

If I had to lean....it would be toward the 500 side here....I just am not seeing a 33% drop off.

I think that the HPS might penetrate deeper a bit too, but the terps are good, so I am happy. :0)

(but I never weigh yields, so use your own findings)

MichiganMedGrower · May 23, 2017

gr865 said:
And where did you come up with that number?
I ran a 400W HPS and there is no comparison.
Please show me data!
GR

I have been running one right next to a 600w Super hps since last year. And I used a 400 Super in the same reflector as well.

The number is approximate and my opinion of many comparisons I have done.

I run plants at different stages so I don't have an average yield just results from one plant/clone at a time.

The 400 has a definite 3x3 footprint in my Blockbuster. The 315 has a 2.5 x 2.5 footprint in the SS remote reflector.

I would compromise by agreeing it could be 450 in intensity and usable plant light.

It isn't closer to the 600 than the 400 in my experience.

MichiganMedGrower · May 23, 2017

ttystikk said:
From me, among other places.

You have got to be kidding. I have been ignoring and correcting your information since my first night here.

MichiganMedGrower · May 23, 2017

Javadog said:
If I had to lean....it would be toward the 500 side here....I just am not seeing a 33% drop off.

I think that the HPS might penetrate deeper a bit too, but the terps are good, so I am happy. :0)

(but I never weigh yields, so use your own findings)

I agreed after my post to 450 :-)

gr865 · May 23, 2017

MichiganMedGrower said:
You have got to be kidding. I have been ignoring and correcting your information since my first night here.

Ok I am asking you to shut the fuck up on this shit between you and Ty. I don't really give a damn about who said what, I was only looking for info I can use.

I will report you and get you banned, I don't want to have to do that. But this is a information site, not a one on one bitching site.

gr865 · May 23, 2017

MichiganMedGrower said:
I have been running one right next to a 600w Super hps since last year. And I used a 400 Super in the same reflector as well.

The number is approximate and my opinion of many comparisons I have done.

I run plants at different stages so I don't have an average yield just results from one plant/clone at a time.

The 400 has a definite 3x3 footprint in my Blockbuster. The 315 has a 2.5 x 2.5 footprint in the SS remote reflector.

I would compromise by agreeing it could be 450 in intensity and usable plant light.

It isn't closer to the 600 than the 400 in my experience.

I ask for data, not personal experience. I am not trying to get on your shit, but hey I just did a 15 zip grow with a 315 and a 300+ W LED.
I may not be the best grower in this forum but I do value sound info.
Thanks for the response.
GR

Club 315w lec

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Member

Well-Known Member

Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member