deprave
New Member
The moral reality is that Counterfeiting is illegal, central banking is no exception. Those who are in power are not the exception to ethics and moral rules. Prosecute the Central Banks for illegal counterfieting just as they would prosecute us. Basic violations of ethics are not to be permitted by any one individual for we are all human and we are all equal.
There is one common thread is American Politcs and the Press. Philosophy is ignored. There is three ways at looking at society; Religiosity, Philosophy, and Statism. You can poor through paper after paper and NOT ONE SINGLE ETHICAL QUESTION IS EVER PROPOSED! (it is an outrage for philosophy hence the caps). Philosophy for example takes the European crisis away quite simply. Counterfeiting is illegal enforce the laws equally, the problem in a round about way is that those who enforce the counterfeit laws are the ones doing the counterfeiting. Very easy to figure out in philosophy, its immoral. We take counterfeiting and we call it central banking and we think that its okay, its not, its immoral.
Religiosity out of a primative superstition, we did not have the structures and so we needed answers. The state is based on the idea that society is a pyramid, born out of a very primative thought as well, these views don't make use of the technological advances we have today. These old structures we inherited, we didn't invent them.
Philosophy can not sustain contradiction, like science it does not allow contradictions to imperical evidence or contradictions within the argument. Philosophy has been around for a long time as well but Philosophy is very difficult for people, I think because it is unsentimantal, not emotional, it doesn't respect history or culture. When we look at the map we see lots of colors and lines. Philosophy doesn't see that, Philosophy just sees the world clear and straight for what it is; there is no magical line between the ground and countries, there is only people and there is things. Yet, without philosophy, we have a great deal of time understanding the world.
There is one common thread is American Politcs and the Press. Philosophy is ignored. There is three ways at looking at society; Religiosity, Philosophy, and Statism. You can poor through paper after paper and NOT ONE SINGLE ETHICAL QUESTION IS EVER PROPOSED! (it is an outrage for philosophy hence the caps). Philosophy for example takes the European crisis away quite simply. Counterfeiting is illegal enforce the laws equally, the problem in a round about way is that those who enforce the counterfeit laws are the ones doing the counterfeiting. Very easy to figure out in philosophy, its immoral. We take counterfeiting and we call it central banking and we think that its okay, its not, its immoral.
Religiosity out of a primative superstition, we did not have the structures and so we needed answers. The state is based on the idea that society is a pyramid, born out of a very primative thought as well, these views don't make use of the technological advances we have today. These old structures we inherited, we didn't invent them.
Philosophy can not sustain contradiction, like science it does not allow contradictions to imperical evidence or contradictions within the argument. Philosophy has been around for a long time as well but Philosophy is very difficult for people, I think because it is unsentimantal, not emotional, it doesn't respect history or culture. When we look at the map we see lots of colors and lines. Philosophy doesn't see that, Philosophy just sees the world clear and straight for what it is; there is no magical line between the ground and countries, there is only people and there is things. Yet, without philosophy, we have a great deal of time understanding the world.
