Daily light cap on photo vs auto

Hugedevice

New Member
Hey guys, first post here.

Have anyone ever tried/come across a research/experiment that tests if autoflowering cannabis can absorb/store/produce more energy/atp or any other resource daily compared to photoperiodic plant?
Or maybe one about the maximum amount of light they can take as in µmol/m2/s
As far as I know the maximum photosynthesis for photoperiodic happens at 1500ppfd(disregarding flower appearance and assuming perfect co2 and temperature/humidity)
Has anyone tested this on autoflowering plants?

Sorry if anything is written weirdly..
English isn't my first language and I'm super high
Thanks in advance, your random grower/farmer
 

T macc

Well-Known Member
Hey guys, first post here.

Have anyone ever tried/come across a research/experiment that tests if autoflowering cannabis can absorb/store/produce more energy/atp or any other resource daily compared to photoperiodic plant?
Or maybe one about the maximum amount of light they can take as in µmol/m2/s
As far as I know the maximum photosynthesis for photoperiodic happens at 1500ppfd(disregarding flower appearance and assuming perfect co2 and temperature/humidity)
Has anyone tested this on autoflowering plants?

Sorry if anything is written weirdly..
English isn't my first language and I'm super high
Thanks in advance, your random grower/farmer
Would be interesting. We can breed plants to autoflower, selectively breed out the auto trait, in order to make a photo period plant to absorb more light, or make it less sensitive to light stress. Thus, the plant can take in more energy to make use of in a shorter time (12/12). Just an idea. I know people have used autos to shorten flowering times on photos.
 
Top