ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Your silly assertions about Washington State.
Functional illiteracy in America
- Thread starter ttystikk
- Start date
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
No, I was criticising Joe Biden. I'd choose him over Trump- but that's not exactly a ringing endorsement.
PCXV
Well-Known Member
Who do you think is really lying? Those that accuse Moore and Trump, or those that accuse Hillary Clinton?But it's sure working for democrats against Roy Moore.
PCXV
Well-Known Member
You were literally just mocking the women accusing Moore of rape/harassment/pedophilia in the post I just quoted, as if it were some calculated political maneuver by Democrats. Now that he loses he's "not your hero" but you'd like to still believe that he will win somehow? This is how low of human beings, how much of a blatant disregard of any concept of objective morality, how little ability to discern truth or debate fairly to find truth, that is displayed by people on the right.
Last edited:
choomer
Well-Known Member
Prove where I was slandering the women in the post you "just quoted".
You're treating winning or losing the election to be proof positive of his guilt for alleged unproven claims.
He didn't win.
The democratic tactic of playing on the heart strings with, until someone brings forward a court case, baseless slander has won the day. Congratulations.
I'll be interested in how far you and the media follow this story now that the election is over to see if there is any proof to the allegations.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
I'm still glad he lost. Even leaving his alleged pedophilia aside, his positions were repugnant and regressive.Prove where I was slandering the women in the post you "just quoted".
You're treating winning or losing the election to be proof positive of his guilt for alleged unproven claims.
He didn't win.
The democratic tactic of playing on the heart strings with, until someone brings forward a court case, baseless slander has won the day. Congratulations.
I'll be interested in how far you and the media follow this story now that the election is over to see if there is any proof to the allegations.
PCXV
Well-Known Member
Not slander, you simply discredit them right away and write it off as "those damn Democrats scheming." That is accusing the victims. Why are you quick to assume they are lying but not Moore? In sexual harassment, attempted rape, and rape cases, hard evidence usually is impossible to acquire, but is not required for the average person to discern truth if they examine the known facts. 10 women all with detailed accounts that outline the same sociopath.Prove where I was slandering the women in the post you "just quoted".
You're treating winning or losing the election to be proof positive of his guilt for alleged unproven claims.
He didn't win.
The democratic tactic of playing on the heart strings with, until someone brings forward a court case, baseless slander has won the day. Congratulations.
I'll be interested in how far you and the media follow this story now that the election is over to see if there is any proof to the allegations.
see4
Well-Known Member
"Baseless claim", it's clear you don't know how supporting evidence works.Prove where I was slandering the women in the post you "just quoted".
You're treating winning or losing the election to be proof positive of his guilt for alleged unproven claims.
He didn't win.
The democratic tactic of playing on the heart strings with, until someone brings forward a court case, baseless slander has won the day. Congratulations.
I'll be interested in how far you and the media follow this story now that the election is over to see if there is any proof to the allegations.
When Person A says, "he touched my breast", and a witness, lets call them Person B, says, "yea, I remember seeing that", then a third person comes forward, we can call them Person C, says, "ya know what, I do recall that guy touching Person A's breast as well". Person A's claim is no longer baseless.
And your tiny penis is super small and showing.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
if 10 accusers went to court with 30 contemporaneous witnesses, multiple yearbooks, cops who were assigned to keep him away from high schools, mall managers who banned him from the mall, and moore's own admission that he had to "ask permission from the mother", then he would lose that case in a heartbeat.
are you really this fucking stupid?
your serial pedophile nazi buddy lost. get over it.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i said hillary won in a vote of over 800,000 people in washington state but bernie still won 47 more delegates than her.
please point out any fact that i did not get right there.
dagwood45431
Well-Known Member
Giving UB kudos for smacking the shit out of you in such a humorous way means all of that? You have elevated UB as your bugaboo, dumdum.
choomer
Well-Known Member
Strange that I see it exactly opposite, but definitely amusing.
You and your cohorts elevated him to such placement which means you all naturally gravitate to 2nd banana @ best.
Use whatever measurement you like (post count, longevity, general stupidity, etc.), it still means you are a sycophantic minion.
choomer
Well-Known Member
Because they brought forth allegations w/ no proof outside of a yearbook inscription as proof of something that happened 40 years ago that no one is allowed to examine and verify.
I didn't discredit them. They did themselves until they have something verifiable.
choomer
Well-Known Member
see4
Well-Known Member
Aww, poor moocher thought I was serious.Thank you for proving the thread title yet again.
You must be proud!
Stay classy, sport.
A.K.A. Overgrowem
Well-Known Member
Choomer has hope, several late reporting graveyard precincts could sweep Moore in. Bama is listed as the 4th most corrupt state. I rate them at least second. No one there would challenge the vote of a Civil War veteran.
A.K.A. Overgrowem
Well-Known Member
Lame stream reports its been confirmed. It's his John Hancock
choomer
Well-Known Member
Great! Link to the report as I'm not interested in doing your homework.
"Lame stream" challenges the Mississippi river in breadth and depth these days which is why I have better things to do than search for the veracity of what you post.