Goldstars

GrowRock

Well-Known Member
What a joke that rehtorical bs that says basically we are a moot point due to Allard and smith and the creation of the amrcp. What a load the new system is only temporary until legalization wtf....
 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member
it was a long shot but worth taking.
they really didn't look at what was presented very well.
the fact they said we didn't provide medical stuff when we gave our MMAR lic #'s didn't cut it. if HC says we had a medical need, why isn't that good enough?
such blinders to what we said.
angering.
they said striking cannabis from the CDSA was ruled on twice is not true to a point-it was snuck in with no real argument or too late in the case. they still mentioned it anyway..??
so many things they got wrong to dismiss it but oh well....NEXT!
 

GrowRock

Well-Known Member
Ya I like how the courts don't find hellth cnanadas mmar paper work as proof of medical need for canabis what a joke that line of bs is by justice phelan
 

bigmanc

Well-Known Member
Basically called us a waste of time. All applications were the same with no detail. ACMPR resolved it. Was a duplicate of 2 other cases. Argument for damages is moot. It seems it's easy to clog up the court system lol
 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member
i think it would be good to refile with a few changes
the part it seems to me that hey hung their hat on was the no one submitted their medical paperwork...but us supplying their MMAD #'s wasn't good enough. we had to supply HC our medical stuff and they had to agree to give us that #...but now the courts have to go over that info to see if it's valid??
all they want to do is say we're wrong.
for them to say all 20 torts of the Goldstar action were mooted by the 4 in Allard..??!!
 
Top