Government Is Placing An Unfair Burden on Doctors Who Prescribe Marijuana

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
Earlier this year, the legislative framework surrounding the provision of medical marijuana in Canada underwent significant change. On April 1, 2014, for-profit corporations who have been granted license by the government assumed responsibility for growing and dispensing prescribed medical marijuana.

Physicians, who are charged with assessing the appropriateness of dried marijuana for their patients and writing the "medical document" which must be presented to these licensed producers in order to procure the product, have been thrust into the role of gatekeeper. As they are learning, it's a particularly onerous gate.

Aside from having to grapple with the ethical and legal concerns involved in prescribing an illegal substance, physicians who prescribe medical marijuana are also expected to perform demanding and time-consuming services for the corporations who profit from its sale. The physicians receive nothing in return.

The additional workload associated with prescribing medical marijuana is partially buried under a cloak of semantics. Take, for example, the "medical document" that physicians must complete in order to authorize patient access to dried marijuana. According to a draft policy statement published by The College of Physicians and Surgeons, "Physicians enable patients to access a legal supply of dried marijuana by completing a medical document that functions like a conventional prescription." However, ask a physician who has begun prescribing medical marijuana and you will learn that this medical document is anything but a conventional prescription.

Writing a prescription for medical marijuana is far more involved than writing one for a legal and registered medication. Given that a physician is facilitating access to an illegal substance, great care must be taken to ensure the prescription is written with precision and accuracy. Even more burdensome is the requirement to "verify" these prescriptions for every patient. The verification process requires a licensed producer who has received a prescription to contact the issuing doctor and asks him or her to confirm a lengthy list of items ranging from the patient's date of birth to confirming whether or not the physician will receive the marijuana on behalf of the "applicant". (The actual set of questions asked varies from producer to producer.) This process does not exist for any other drug.

While the verification process has been likened to a pharmacist occasionally calling a doctor to confirm a prescription, it is anything but. The licensed producers who are requesting the time and credentials of physicians are not pharmacists or other health care providers but for-profit businesses, each one with their own demands and requirements. Some, for example, require a written response while others call and demand that the physician respond the same day, not hesitating to remind them of the College's policy that physicians must respond to an enquiry in a "timely and professional manner". Give that these corporations keep typical business hours, this means that physicians must take time out from attending to other patients in order to respond.

At present, this time-consuming service is an uninsured one and its accompanying opportunity cost -- taking physicians away from attending to other patients on a fee-for-service basis -- is borne solely by the physician. Because the College considers the medical document to access medical marijuana equivalent to a prescription and, since prescriptions and activities related to prescriptions are insured services, physicians cannot charge patients; fair enough. But what about the for-profit corporations who are benefitting at the physicians' expense? They're not paying either. In fact, in June of this year, the Canadian Medical Cannabis Industry Association (CMCIA) passed a policy urging their members not to pay physicians for the time, expertise, and credentials required for verification.

Given the state of Canada's health care system it is perhaps not surprising that there is not enough -- be it money or resources -- to go around. Yet, when considering how the spoils of the medical marijuana industry are being divvied up among the stakeholders, it would seem that doctors are getting the short end of the stick. Patients gain because they have access to a substance that will bring them some relief from pain. Health Canada, who will no longer have to deal with the administrative headache involved in issuing permits to individuals who are licensed to possess cannabis for medicinal purposes -- currently 37,000 Canadians -- to grow their own or purchase it form small-scale producers, also comes out ahead. But the big winners by far appear to be the for-profit, private-sector commercial producers who will clearly benefit from an industry that is expected to be worth more than $1 billion a year by 2024. And make no mistake, this is not an industry made up of a host of mom-and-pop pot entrepreneurs. Similar to what happened with alcohol at the end of Prohibition, we are already beginning to see signs that this has the potential to morph into an industry dominated by a few giant corporations. It would be unfortunate indeed if their profits come at the expense of compassionate Canadian doctors.
 

gb123

Well-Known Member
That was one of the main controversies at the start well before april 1st of this year.
Maybe they figured everyone should keep up on the issues at hand
 

WHATFG

Well-Known Member
Wasn't it really a matter of time before some doctors banded together? Wtf is up with the online questionairre to see if you qualify? Qualify? I didn't think it was a competition type situation. Shouldn't they really be saying something like...if you have a medical condition that conventional treatment fails to treat, call us? Somehow, somewhere, the whole reason for being allowed to use MJ for medical reasons has been lost.
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
It should another nail in the mmpr coffin. It demonstrates clearly that the mmpr is designed solely for those involved, including the harptler regime, to profit from the sick.. From where I sit, there has been no attempt to comply with SCoC's ruling for reasonable access. Where as the SC had the patient in mind, Harper's little hitler-mind automatically went to work to develop an government controlled, high profit program on behalf of corporations and the rich investors.
I use cannabis for pain. When I still went to a doctor, I did not once have to fill out a questionnaire for any prescription he gave me to see if I qualified. He knew full well that I would require pain relief for life, he knew what the continued use of pills do to your body not to mention my quality of life. Yet he wouldn't talk about mmj. How much of that anti-mj stance is a result of incentives from big pharma? Just watched a expose on pharmacies and the gifts they get from generic drug producers trying to sell their product. There was talk in BC a few years back of the government making the deal with big pharma on behalf of pharmacies to get a 'bulk' price and to avoid these 'pay-offs'. It didn't take long before the politicians were getting the gifts. The mmpr is no different...lots of bags of money being passed across tables at Tim Hortons.
 

cannadan

Well-Known Member
when your told by the doctor ....here is the company you need to buy your mmj from..
chances are they will do just that....and many will not look further than that into it,,,,,
They are already sick and or suffering...and have other things that must get done ...
just like everyone else...
the kick back system makes it all a big hustle....
 
Top