As with all scientific endeavors, the burden of proof is on the ones who propose a theory. It is not my responsibility to disprove Man Made Global Warming, it is my responsibility, as a rational human being, to ask questions, receive answers, and formulate my position based on the quality of the answer. All the evidence I've seen is circumstantial at best, and downright deceitful at worst. Modern weather monitoring equipment has been around for barely a hundred years, yet the information collected in these hundred years is used to support your theory. Its not reliable. The green house gas argument is flawed to the core. The most abundant green house gas, by far, is water vapor. No model, computer or otherwise, accounts for this. Global precipitation levels are vitally important to the earths cooling/warming trends. We have absolutely no idea what daily precipitation levels are around the globe. Without knowing this factor, any green house gas argument is flawed. Ice ages have been known to occur on a relatively regular basis, yet this fact seems unimportant to proponents of this "theory". The fact that the earths temps rise and fall on a regular basis, with or without human intervention. The pollution aspect of global warming has been the most insidious aspect of your argument. (You and Algore). Without even going into the negligible amounts of CO2 we, as a species, have contributed to the atmosphere since the start of the industrial revolution, the fact that growing industrialized nations, such as China and others, have not been asked to curtail their activities while the worlds elite point the finger at the USA as the major cause of Man Made Global Warming, is despicable. If the burning of fossil fuels is so terrible, why not call on all the worlds nations to suspend indefinitely these activities. Instead, the answer is for the US to pay for its transgressions against the environment. How convenient. Its a sham and you seem to be buying, based on faith of your religion, Environmentalism.
