Message from Conroy

WHATFG

Well-Known Member
VANCOUVER, BC, NOVEMBER 15th, 2014 — Cannabis in Canada wishes to publicly stress the importance of the appeal and the cross appeal of plaintiffs Neil Allard, Tanya Beemish, David Herbert, and Shawn Davey, on the matter of addressing the errors and oversights of the March 21st, 2014, Federal Court ordered injunction. The proceedings are set for hearing at the Pacific Centre, 701 West Georgia Street, 6th Floor, Vancouver, British Columbia, commencing at 9:30 a.m. on Monday, November 24, 2014 for a duration of four hours.


BACKGROUND


Access to Medicine


As mandated by the Canadian Health Act, whether on the provincial or federal level, the role of the State in Canada is to ensure patients receive the health care they require. When responding to medical cannabis patients, Canada's federal government has forgotten this fundamental duty. Rather than supporting patients, Health Canada continues to block reasonable access to their doctor-approved medicine while exposing medical cannabis patients to legal and criminal sanctions.


Health Canada's flawed policy known as the Marihuana for Medical Purposes Regulation (MMPR), was formally introduced on April 1st, 2014. The transition from the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations (MMAR) to the MMPR program represents a substantial change in direction for the supply and acquisition of medical marihuana in Canada.


If the MMPR regulations are enforced as written, all licensed patients’ personal production and caregiver assisted production of cannabis (their “medicine”) will be shutdown. Instead, all patients will be forced to obtain their medicine from a "licensed producer" or LP, at a drastically increased cost.


By Health Canada's own estimate, the cost will increase from $5.00 per gram to $8.80 per gram.This amounts to an annual $5,000 increase for patients on the average dosage.The average dose is 18.5 grams-a-day, based on all legal permits, which is a far cry from the 5 gram-a day-limit the feds try to impose.

Current LPs are advertising rates from $9-$14 per gram, well beyond the scope of affordability for most users, whom statistics show. 70% of patients are on low-income pensions or income assistance.There are only 21 LPs and only a handful have enough inventory to handle an order if a patient needed it.


The Appeal and Cross Appeal on November 24th, 2014


As of March 21st, 2014, an injunction was granted by Justice Manson at the Federal BC Court of Appeal. It is argued by the plaintiff’s Attorney John W. Conroy, Q.C., that many medicinal marihuana patients’ rights were not fully protected by the court-ordered injunction, which preserved the “regulatory option” for those authorized under the former MMAR regulatory regime to possess a personal production license.


The Crown (Attorney General of Canada) is on trial and the defendant in this matter. The injunction has now been appealed by the Crown and John W. Conroy, Q.C., has issued a cross appeal. While it is true that the Crown is the defendant in the pleadings, this is a constitutional challenge to the law, as enacted by Parliament, and so they are Respondents to the allegations of the law being in violation of the Constitution. View the court order here.


The Plaintiffs of the cross appeal argue that Justice Manson made errors while instating the injunction on the following items:


The 150g carry limit is being contested. Many patients require and carry ‘over’ 150g / day permits. Those that have moved, or have changed their address will now lose their Federal Court injunction protection, allowing patients to continue to grow their own medicinal cannabis. Dates for injunction implementation remain in question Sept 30th or March 21st as accepted by the Attorney General


ABOUT JASON WILCOX:


Cannabis in Canada Founding Director Jason Wilcox will be made available to the media for commentary and insight into the appeal and the cross appeal of plaintiffs Neil Allard, Tanya Beemish, David Herbert, and Shawn Davey, on the matter of addressing the errors and oversights of the March 21st, 2014, Federal Court ordered injunction.


Mr. Wilcox is founder of the independent media and community organization Cannabis in Canada (CinC), as well as the co-founder of the MMAR Coalition against Repeal. CinC provides a forum where like-minded cannabis patients gather to collaborate on instructional growing techniques, discover the latest news, events and political debates regarding the free cannabis movement, and a platform in which to discover accurate research information pertaining to the positive attributes and medicinal characteristics of cannabis.


The MMAR DPL/PPL Coalition Against Repeal is a coalition of over 6,000 members fighting for preservation of certain provisions of the MMAR. The Coalition was modeled and founded by Jason Wilcox to address the serious problems in Health Canada's newly proposed regulations MMPR or Marihuana for Medical Purposes Regulations.

It's possible that I received this as a result of a question I sent to Wilcox asking if any of the complaints lodged here had been receivd. The message was sent from Tamara Haasan, Communications Director, Cannabis in Canada.
 

Nadine Bews

Well-Known Member
Thank you my dear Mr. Conroy for the foregoing information about, Jason Frederick Wilcox, your partner in the Conroy-Wilcox partnership operating as the MMAR PPL/DPL Coalition against Repeal aka Cannabis Rights Coalition; another one of your many 'organizations' that you have 'created' over the years to facilitate your 'cannabis legalization agenda' including but not limited to the formation of the BC Compassion Club and its sister club the now defunct Universal Compassion Club, NORML Canada MCRCI. and the online group operating as the Cannabis Coalition to name a few.. However dear John, it may be your old age or the stress from the injunction, but you have omitted a few hard 'facts' about your partner which shows that you lack the ability to properly clear your partners and ensure that they have a 'clean' record or else you have carefully selected Wilcox as your sole partner because of his 'acquired skills' obtained through his experience operating as a cocaine dealer while residing in Los Angeles during the Rodney King Days of the late 1990's. This is also the period of time where Wilcox obtained his 'illness' that qualified him to move from L.A. street-gang cocaine user/dealer to medicinal cannabis patient in the historical federal constitutional court challenge testing the discrimination against patients to use cannabis as a medicine. Although Conroy had the choice of any of the highly qualified patients from across Canada as the personal representative of patients in the joint-personal representative solicitor-client relationship he chose the inept and corrupt Wilcox. Now I shall have to obtain the objective opinion of Hizhonour to determine if the patients were intentionally misrepresented and misled by his QC. I have a series of letters that were written by Conroy and signed and sent through social media by Wilcox to innocent patients requesting their support for a legal challenge. Misleading through the use of deception by way of authoring letters for others is a 'Conroy-pattern' such as the letter authored by Conroy and issued by UCC president Debra Harper and sent to the BC Provincial Court (BCPC File 3189) falsely claiming that the illegal crop produced by Kruse was contracted for by the UCC. Such conduct is called forming a conspiracy and is considered to be a crime under Section 467.111 of the CCC. Furthermore, I have hard evidence to prove that your legal fees were financed through the deposit of illegal funds through the notorious lock-boxx program whereby 82 white plastic lock-boxes were strategically distributed throughout Canada to solicit untraceable cash. This shall be reported to the Revenue Canada Information Leads Program and also to FINTRAC which under section 47 of the Proceeds of Crime Acts requires folks like me with such knowledge to report my findings. Furthermore, for tax purposes, I shall request an opinion from the tax courts that the Coalition is a private enterprise established for cannabis legalization purposes and not a non-profit organization. By the way dear John although the BC Law Society has no problem with you attempting to extort a cut of the privacy breach from Kate Saunders at Branch McMaster, I understand that such conduct is indeed breach of the Professional Code of Conduct and I shall therefore include a request for Hizhonour to also review this matter. Take care my dear friend and remember that 'love' and 'laughter' are still the very best medicines, although much less financially lucrative, they are still not yet illegal.
 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member
i hope you do something Nadine. you have been saying you were going to file this now for around a year? i don't think posting things directed to CONroy will do anything as i don't think he's here
 

Nadine Bews

Well-Known Member
Dear Doing Dishes, thank you for your timely response and ongoing interest in this very important matter, however, be advised that the purpose of this post is to provide 'notice' to affected parties and is not intended as a tool for contacting and communicating with Conroy or Wilcox, they shall be notified and served according to the prescribed format. However, my Dear Doing Dishes, I am but one person and have only two hands wiht one over-used brain and broken-down body, but be advised the research has been conducted, the findings are recorded with supporting documents as evidence of the claims and the legal documents are almost finalized and ready for release. I have no intention of conducting the balance of the audit online or in this forum but simply keeping you good folks apprised of affairs, no different than I would do for any other entity I am working for or with.
 

torontomeds

Well-Known Member
Thank you my dear Mr. Conroy for the foregoing information about, Jason Frederick Wilcox, your partner in the Conroy-Wilcox partnership operating as the MMAR PPL/DPL Coalition against Repeal aka Cannabis Rights Coalition; another one of your many 'organizations' that you have 'created' over the years to facilitate your 'cannabis legalization agenda' including but not limited to the formation of the BC Compassion Club and its sister club the now defunct Universal Compassion Club, NORML Canada MCRCI. and the online group operating as the Cannabis Coalition to name a few.. However dear John, it may be your old age or the stress from the injunction, but you have omitted a few hard 'facts' about your partner which shows that you lack the ability to properly clear your partners and ensure that they have a 'clean' record or else you have carefully selected Wilcox as your sole partner because of his 'acquired skills' obtained through his experience operating as a cocaine dealer while residing in Los Angeles during the Rodney King Days of the late 1990's. This is also the period of time where Wilcox obtained his 'illness' that qualified him to move from L.A. street-gang cocaine user/dealer to medicinal cannabis patient in the historical federal constitutional court challenge testing the discrimination against patients to use cannabis as a medicine. Although Conroy had the choice of any of the highly qualified patients from across Canada as the personal representative of patients in the joint-personal representative solicitor-client relationship he chose the inept and corrupt Wilcox. Now I shall have to obtain the objective opinion of Hizhonour to determine if the patients were intentionally misrepresented and misled by his QC. I have a series of letters that were written by Conroy and signed and sent through social media by Wilcox to innocent patients requesting their support for a legal challenge. Misleading through the use of deception by way of authoring letters for others is a 'Conroy-pattern' such as the letter authored by Conroy and issued by UCC president Debra Harper and sent to the BC Provincial Court (BCPC File 3189) falsely claiming that the illegal crop produced by Kruse was contracted for by the UCC. Such conduct is called forming a conspiracy and is considered to be a crime under Section 467.111 of the CCC. Furthermore, I have hard evidence to prove that your legal fees were financed through the deposit of illegal funds through the notorious lock-boxx program whereby 82 white plastic lock-boxes were strategically distributed throughout Canada to solicit untraceable cash. This shall be reported to the Revenue Canada Information Leads Program and also to FINTRAC which under section 47 of the Proceeds of Crime Acts requires folks like me with such knowledge to report my findings. Furthermore, for tax purposes, I shall request an opinion from the tax courts that the Coalition is a private enterprise established for cannabis legalization purposes and not a non-profit organization. By the way dear John although the BC Law Society has no problem with you attempting to extort a cut of the privacy breach from Kate Saunders at Branch McMaster, I understand that such conduct is indeed breach of the Professional Code of Conduct and I shall therefore include a request for Hizhonour to also review this matter. Take care my dear friend and remember that 'love' and 'laughter' are still the very best medicines, although much less financially lucrative, they are still not yet illegal.

I started to read and you lost me at "Illness" someone being sick is nothing to joke about. This is a Cannabis chat room, do you have some bud reports? grow reports? information that can help other sick people? if not this is not the place for your grievances for JW or JC, lets all try to get along and not fight. If you have a problem with them take it up in court, if the courts will not hear you then I am sorry but RIU is not the place for this. If I was a mod here I would of banned you or at least suspended you for all the BS you post on here.
 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member
Dear Doing Dishes, thank you for your timely response and ongoing interest in this very important matter, however, be advised that the purpose of this post is to provide 'notice' to affected parties and is not intended as a tool for contacting and communicating with Conroy or Wilcox, they shall be notified and served according to the prescribed format. However, my Dear Doing Dishes, I am but one person and have only two hands wiht one over-used brain and broken-down body, but be advised the research has been conducted, the findings are recorded with supporting documents as evidence of the claims and the legal documents are almost finalized and ready for release. I have no intention of conducting the balance of the audit online or in this forum but simply keeping you good folks apprised of affairs, no different than I would do for any other entity I am working for or with.
working with or for?? we are here because we want to be. no one is working for anyone here...except the mods.
you have been saying the same thing for quite a while. how about an update past the threats? we have all heard this before....and before.
you have posted your intentions quite a few times yet nothing ever happens past this step.
shit or get off the pot
 
Top