Progressives protest Diane Feinstein; 'support single payer or retire'

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
BERNIEBUTTFUCKERS WERE HIS #1 CHEERLEADERS
Is this your defense mechanism? Anything in order to avoid fixing the inherent problems in running a corporate campaign? Look at the facts.. More Sanders supporters voted for Clinton in 16 than Clinton supporters voted for Obama in 08. More Democrats voted for Trump than all registered Sanders, Stein, and Johnson supporters combined. She lost on her own because her message didn't resonate with the electorate. Democrats knew the rules of the EC before going into it, they didn't have a problem with it until the results of the election became apparent. At least be consistent. Why aren't any of you working towards changing it now?
 

KillerIndica

Well-Known Member
She's the one who said she wants to see single payer health Care and understands that her constituency wants it- but then out of the other side of her mouth comes up with a pile of excuses about how it isn't feasible.

Maybe those protesters prefer their politicians to be a bit less two-faced?
Ya think?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
RIGHT UP TO ELECTION DAY YOU AND YOUR FELLOW BERNIECOCKSUCKERS DID NOTHING BUT MALIGN, CRITICISE AND VERBLLY DESTROY CLINTON. WITH DISINFORMATION, ACCUSATIONS AND AT THE SAME TIME YOU WERE TELLING PEOPLE TO STAY HOME

SO FUUUUUUCK YOU BYATCH
padaraper bought into the "hillary on her deathbed" conspiracy theory, among others.

tty called her "shillary".

and they praise trump as the best thing to happen to progressives.

i'm just glad we;ve identified the turncoat fucks. i don't want them in the party.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Is this your defense mechanism? Anything in order to avoid fixing the inherent problems in running a corporate campaign? Look at the facts.. More Sanders supporters voted for Clinton in 16 than Clinton supporters voted for Obama in 08. More Democrats voted for Trump than all registered Sanders, Stein, and Johnson supporters combined. She lost on her own because her message didn't resonate with the electorate. Democrats knew the rules of the EC before going into it, they didn't have a problem with it until the results of the election became apparent. At least be consistent. Why aren't any of you working towards changing it now?
RIGHT UP TO ELECTION DAY YOU AND YOUR FELLOW BERNIECOCKSUCKERS DID NOTHING BUT MALIGN, CRITICISE AND VERBLLY DESTROY CLINTON. WITH DISINFORMATION, ACCUSATIONS AND AT THE SAME TIME YOU WERE TELLING PEOPLE TO STAY HOME

SO FUUUUUUCK YOU BYATCH
Well gosh... Which of these arguments is more reasoned and supported with evidence?

Pad, arguing with toddlers is a waste of time. Maybe he'll grow up someday and make something of himself- and maybe he won't. Time is running short, after all.
 

Chezus

Well-Known Member
For shits and giggles. do a search for the word "corrupt" and member name ttystikk.
Do that with any of the Sanderdicklickers names and see what you come up with
 

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
Bernie personally likes Hillary. He supported her after the primaries and voted for her in the general and would have played a big role in that administration.

It's strange that many of his supporters didn't follow his lead.

He certainly understood what was at stake. He certainly didn't want a right wing SCOTUS or see the environment thrown to the dogs.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Bernie personally likes Hillary. He supported her after the primaries and voted for her in the general and would have played a big role in that administration.

It's strange that many of his supporters didn't follow his lead.

He certainly understood what was at stake. He certainly didn't want a right wing SCOTUS or see the environment thrown to the dogs.
All this is true, as is the fact that more Bernie backers voted for Clinton than Clinton backers voted for Obama in '08.

Yet, she still lost. My suggestion is that next time the Left needs to run a campaign on the issues voters care most about.
 

KillerIndica

Well-Known Member
For shits and giggles. do a search for the word "corrupt" and member name ttystikk.
Do that with any of the Sanderdicklickers names and see what you come up with
Why don't you shove your centrist head right up your ass. Centrism is surrender.

Did you know, suicide is painless?
 

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
My suggestion is that next time the Left needs to run a campaign on the issues voters care most about.
They tried.

They were also fighting against a rather obvious (in hind sight) backlash of 8 years of a black man that the right despised.

So the other side got votes not really based in any 'issue', they just wanted a lying white guy to tell them he'd bring jobs back and that there's good people among racist rebels.

His 35% approval rating base doesn't vote on issues. They don't even know what the issues are ffs. The just make shit up about pizza places in DC.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
While Clinton and her supporters continue to focus on the wedge in the Democratic party in an effort to grasp at any remaining straws that they believe will keep her relevant, Sanders and his supporters continue to push progressive policies forward and battle the GOP and Trump on every regressive action they take
Clinton is irrelevant to the upcoming elections. We aren't "her supporters" anymore, she is a private citizen. Sanders is not as bad as Trump but I'd like somebody who will unify rather than pander to white liberal racists for votes.
 

Heil Tweetler

Well-Known Member
Well gosh... Which of these arguments is more reasoned and supported with evidence?

Pad, arguing with toddlers is a waste of time. Maybe he'll grow up someday and make something of himself- and maybe he won't. Time is running short, after all.
Titstick, your messsge, weeping and witless, self referencing and tractionless is "toddlers" formula. Stop trying to feed it to adults who have rejected as laughable your deepest commitments and slavish beliefs.
 
Last edited:
Top