the politics of fucking little girls: roy moore, the next GOP senator from alabama

will you vote for roy moore, the nazi pedophile?

  • yes, MAGA!

  • no


Results are only viewable after voting.

travisw

Well-Known Member
Hey dumbass, have you noticed who's actually in the Oval Orifice?


Respectfully, I'm trying to live up to that standard and stay above the name calling fray.
I'm not here to hate on them out heap scorn, I'm really truly here to change a few minds, so I try not to resort to name calling.
The graph is very instructive, the name calling, not so much.
Back to name-calling, because at base you're just a hater on a weed site.Talk about pathetic.
Why didn't you vote for the Chump? You sure act like him.
. And you call others names, as if that's supposed to convince anyone of anything but the weakness of your arguments.
And back to the name-calling because you got nothing but hatred.You're the closest thing to a skinhead on this site; you spew hate all day long, especially when you're dead wrong.
Name-calling, shit posting and off topic.
Trifecta! Do you ever have an original thought?
And name calling. And no evidence. And shit posting.Elitist shill.
Name-calling, shit posting.
you just name-call and shit post.
Hate speech, name-calling.Oh- and shit posting.
Hate speech and name calling.And no evidence.Yawn.
hate speech and name-calling.Intolerant Fascist.
keep on name-calling like your Dear Leader, Buck the Fascist.
You literally can't stop lying and name-calling, fascist.
You must be desperate. That's a lot of name-calling in one shit post, even for you.Fascist.Establishment shill.Apartheid supporter.Intolerant.
Those are not 'names', they're accurate, descriptive labels. batshit crazy,
Ah-more name-calling, so I must be onto the truth.Establishment elitist shill or lying wannabe? apartheid supporter.
Zero point, but name-calling!How intelligent.
And name-calling, because apparently insulting people is all you've got.You're almost as intolerant of other people's views as Buckwit. Keep trying...
You're disgusting.
Zero point, but name-calling!How intelligent.
Name calling shows your points are weak.
Stinkydigit
strikes (out) again!
And back to name-calling because you have nothing to say.
Hmmmm.No point so gotta name-call.Derp.
Lol derp.Name calling without substance. Typical low information voter.
is name-calling enough for you?
Name calling doesn't do anything but prove that you know your position isn't tenable.
He got into office because of them.

More name-calling. Go back to playing with your blocks.
More foaming at the mouth name-calling. Pathetic. And still dead stupid wrong.
you've mistaken name calling for valid points in an intellectual debate.
As usual, name-calling with zero supporting evidence or even a coherent position. Stinkydigit.
Yep, resorting to name calling like a true spoiled brat.
But nothing. I didn't see anything but you calling me names immediately when i got there.
The argument is weak, that's why he has to call you three of the nastiest names he can think of in order to try to distract you from the weakness of his logic.That's weak.
Name calling Typical.
Blowhard.
Is amateur name-calling the best you can do?I thought you were better than that.
And now you stoop to name-calling with race based epithets.That makes you a racist.Hypocrite.
You're the cultist;
No amount of your name calling
.
IYour insistence on calling everyone names does not help your cause.
You keep trying to call me names instead of refuting my observation.Sure sign of a weak position.
You can't provide a substantive argument so of course you retreat to name calling.
And your name calling just makes you another spittle spewing polemic.Calm down, already.
Oh, I see that no name-calling thing of yours lasted a long time...Stupid.
You are stupid
your worthless and hateful brand of douchbaggery. All you have is name calling, snowflake. Back to your trailer, boy- your Klansmen need to satisfy themselves with you.
Meltdown!Can't debate like an adult so you have to start name-calling...Melting snowflake alert!
Name-calling, huh? That's the best you can manage? I was hoping to have a rational conversation with you but clearly you lack the fundamental skills.
No, the one constantly calling everyone else names fits that description best.
It's a horseshit post from a horseshit poster.
That's why his new name is, YourNameIsZero
Yet I'm not name calling. Go figure.
Lol @ 'not name calling' like a pussy.NARC?
Name calling is beneath you.
Name calling is stupid.
Name-calling, the last refuge of the logically challenged, lol
His strongest (smelling) political argument is calling people names. Pathetic, really.
I'll stop calling you names that imply stupidity when you do some homework.
Your namecalling just reveals you for a loudmouthed fool who substitutes name calling and nastiness for substantive debate.
So calling me names strengthens your logical argument? Or maybe you're the product of republican funding cuts in public education?

@UncleBuck MTN of STUPID.now piss off,
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Changing goal posts always works when you know you were wrong.

I have figured out how to not let it happen again. Remove money from politics and end Electoral College. I think I've been pretty clear on that the entire time.

I find it ironic you call for politicians to "fucking listen", yet every time I say something to you, it goes in one ear and out the other.

"Listening" is not going to solve anything, until you remove the underlying cause of the issue(s). But I've gone over this numerous times already... I'd love to hear your thoughts, besides your normal diatribe.
Nope, the goal posts are still in the very same place; you're just stuck in the last war while the rest of the political world is preparing for the next one.

If you could manage to drop the arrogant holier than thou tone, you may discover that we're in complete agreement on these points.

The only place I differ from the conformism Gestapo here is in terms of methods; having watched the Democratic Party repeatedly choose the money over representing their self proclaimed constituents, I'm no longer confident they will do what I want to see done. Therefore, I'm supporting the Progressive Movement in an effort to force the Democratic Party establishment to take the majority of voters is says it represents seriously and do as we ask- or be replaced by a party that will.

This is an historic time in our nation's political and ideological history.

The oligarch's long running class warfare has finally been recognized for what it is and We the People are beginning to fight back.

The next few years will see this battle get truly underway. It won't be won in the next election, nor even probably in 2020 but it has at least finally been joined.

What side are you on?
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
I used to travel for business to WI. With the exception of Madison and maybe Milwaukee, WI is definitely a red state.
It's the same story throughout the country; metro areas are heavily populated and liberal, while most of the rural areas are conservative. The resulting balance of power in each state therefore closely reflects the urban/rural balance of that state. This is even true for California, Democratic Party supermajority notwithstanding.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Who liked this post says it all. ^^^^

Remember the time you threatened to quit posting here? Was that just bull shit as well, or did you really mean it?
Remember that time when you had something thoughtful and intelligent to add to the conversation?

Yeah, me neither.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
It was an invitation for an explanation. I have my ideas but wouldn't mind hearing from others. Voter suppression is very effective as suppressing black voters. I'm interested in hearing from others what they know about this.
Having lived in Arkansas- land of the Clintons, which is highly relevant in its own right- I've seen many of the barriers that are erected against poor citizens, a disproportionately large number of whom are minorites, black in the case of AR.

It starts long before voting age; their schools prepare them for sharecropping it prison, not citizenship. It's hard for them to get ID and therefore voter registration. They're constantly told that their votes don't matter. Voting is done during work hours and somehow they're discouraged from taking time off from their blue collar jobs to exercise their voting rights... by the usually white, conservative management. Official State ID is NOT considered 'valid identification', amazingly enough- only a real, actual driver's license qualifies (issued by the very same authorities from the very same offices, strangely enough). So without a car, one is effectively disenfranchised. The list of these kinds of subtle hurdles goes on and on, these are just the ones I still remember after a quarter century.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Having lived in Arkansas- land of the Clintons, which is highly relevant in its own right- I've seen many of the barriers that are erected against poor citizens, a disproportionately large number of whom are minorites, black in the case of AR.

It starts long before voting age; their schools prepare them for sharecropping it prison, not citizenship. It's hard for them to get ID and therefore voter registration. They're constantly told that their votes don't matter. Voting is done during work hours and somehow they're discouraged from taking time off from their blue collar jobs to exercise their voting rights... by the usually white, conservative management. Official State ID is NOT considered 'valid identification', amazingly enough- only a real, actual driver's license qualifies (issued by the very same authorities from the very same offices, strangely enough). So without a car, one is effectively disenfranchised. The list of these kinds of subtle hurdles goes on and on, these are just the ones I still remember after a quarter century.
So, you are saying it's not just black people who are deliberately targeted but poor people?
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
So, you are saying it's not just black people who are deliberately targeted but poor people?
In Arkansas, the discrimination was both racial and economic. I did not get out into the countryside much and so I really can't comment on the specifics there. I heard stories but that's hearsay.

I did notice that as a white man I was never questioned about my identity or right to vote, while black people in the same line for the ballot box did get extra scrutiny. That's subjective, yet such behavior was all but universal.

Turns out that poor people tended then, as now, to vote Democratic. Mr Clinton was preceded and replaced by Republicans.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
In Arkansas, the discrimination was both racial and economic. I did not get out into the countryside much and so I really can't comment on the specifics there. I heard stories but that's hearsay.

I did notice that as a white man I was never questioned about my identity or right to vote, while black people in the same line for the ballot box did get extra scrutiny. That's subjective, yet such behavior was all but universal.

Turns out that poor people tended then, as now, to vote Democratic. Mr Clinton was preceded and replaced by Republicans.
I've heard the same. It is said that barriers are often administrative in how the policy was skewed to exclude minorities. It would be fun to see a sting operation where similarly credentialed people, one black and another white try to get a license.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
I've heard the same. It is said that barriers are often administrative in how the policy was skewed to exclude minorities. It would be fun to see a sting operation where similarly credentialed people, one black and another white try to get a license.
No one at the State level would do it. Yeah, it's that bad.

It's exactly what we need our Federal Government to do but they've made it rather clear that they don't feel protecting the rights of citizens is their job anymore- unless of course their income exceeds 7 figures to the left of the decimal place.

I have seen examples of special VIP treatment of such people, as well.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Do you like to live in a kennel...?

I think you'd make a great little pet.
Do you have anything to say relevant to the thread topic? Let alone constructive?

It IS possible to disagree and still act like adults. It just takes maturity.

You do have some, don't you?
 

see4

Well-Known Member
Nope, the goal posts are still in the very same place; you're just stuck in the last war while the rest of the political world is preparing for the next one.

If you could manage to drop the arrogant holier than thou tone, you may discover that we're in complete agreement on these points.

The only place I differ from the conformism Gestapo here is in terms of methods; having watched the Democratic Party repeatedly choose the money over representing their self proclaimed constituents, I'm no longer confident they will do what I want to see done. Therefore, I'm supporting the Progressive Movement in an effort to force the Democratic Party establishment to take the majority of voters is says it represents seriously and do as we ask- or be replaced by a party that will.

This is an historic time in our nation's political and ideological history.

The oligarch's long running class warfare has finally been recognized for what it is and We the People are beginning to fight back.

The next few years will see this battle get truly underway. It won't be won in the next election, nor even probably in 2020 but it has at least finally been joined.

What side are you on?

I get what you are saying, and honestly I'm on board with what to do "moving forward", but unless we can dismiss the past and move on, we will also continue to argue about the past.

Step one, make sure Trump is not president. Step two, remove most of the ass hats in senate and congress and replace with progressive thinkers. Step three, repeal Citizens united. Step four, repeal Electoral college. Step five, legalize pot. Step six, give see4 $100 for coming up with such an awesome plan.

Im high. Really really high. My homegrown is ALWAYS better than the shit they sell at dispensaries. Ewww.
 

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
I get what you are saying, and honestly I'm on board with what to do "moving forward", but unless we can dismiss the past and move on, we will also continue to argue about the past.

Step one, make sure Trump is not president. Step two, remove most of the ass hats in senate and congress and replace with progressive thinkers. Step three, repeal Citizens united. Step four, repeal Electoral college. Step five, legalize pot. Step six, give see4 $100 for coming up with such an awesome plan.

Im high. Really really high. My homegrown is ALWAYS better than the shit they sell at dispensaries. Ewww.
Move step 5 up a notch or two ;-).

Makes coping with the other shit easier.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
No one at the State level would do it. Yeah, it's that bad.

It's exactly what we need our Federal Government to do but they've made it rather clear that they don't feel protecting the rights of citizens is their job anymore- unless of course their income exceeds 7 figures to the left of the decimal place.

I have seen examples of special VIP treatment of such people, as well.
Too bad that we only had four months of a veto proof majority in the Senate at the same time we had control of the WH and House. We managed 34 pieces of legislation during that session. Obama tried to address voter ID as the 35th and it didn't make the cut.

This is where you say corrupt Democrats are the same as Republicans.
 

PCXV

Well-Known Member
Too bad that we only had four months of a veto proof majority in the Senate at the same time we had control of the WH and House. We managed 34 pieces of legislation during that session. Obama tried to address voter ID as the 35th and it didn't make the cut.

This is where you say corrupt Democrats are the same as Republicans.
Only the corrupt ones.

It's one of the things that still surprises and disturbs me the most; that millions of American conservatives are so spoon fed full of hate that they don't respect anyone with a D in front of their name. I can see good in some republican representatives and candidates, but I don't think I know a Republican that doesn't hate Democrats in the most extreme fashion. There are decent Democrats out there. Could the party use improvement? Yes, of course. But we have to vote that change, discuss that change, debate that change, and above all bring people into that discussion. A haphazard will for morality will never defeat the propensity for immorality. Edit: hate for immorality should drive us but shouldn't be employed as a strategy beyond reason. I think we need to start disciplining ourselves from hating too much.
 
Top