The Real Reason White People Say...

B

bundee1

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
It's not denigrating anyone for being gay if they're not gay

If SneekyFa*got sucks dicks, I will wholeheartedly apologize

Stop being such a fa*got, fa*got
Click to expand...
He's not your friend and you should know better. I would think its a word we might have left in the recent past.

I know where you're coming from with your usage but still.
 
B

bundee1

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
If I should know better, why don't you hold UB, or any of the others, to the same standard when they wish cancer on someone they disagree with politically?
Click to expand...
Because maybe you're wrong?

And I've cAlled Buck out a couple of times for lack of originality and vulgarity.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
If I should know better, why don't you hold UB, or any of the others, to the same standard when they wish cancer on someone they disagree with politically?
Click to expand...
you are illiterate.

i said spaghetti noodle was a mooch because of his multiple cancer treatments and that he does not subsidize anyone.

although i do sincerely wish that nazi fuck succumbs to cancer and soon. he is a nazi. that's more than a "political disagreement".
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
bundee1 said:
Because its offensive to gay people, and you're using it in an offensive not complimentary manner. Simple enough.
Click to expand...
I'm not using the word to denigrate gay people. The way I'm using it has nothing to do with homosexuality.

If you think it's offensive, that's fine, but it's in no way homophobic
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
@Padawanbater2 Thanks for liking this post so I could find it again.

@Fogdog @UncleBuck this is the original post, in its entirety. Chipping off the first statement is taking it out of context.
Click to expand...
No. It is the major premise of your fallacious argument and the opening statement. It is not distorted but quoted verbatim.

You can just say that you were wrong about it instead of this exercise in futility you are continuing by defending it as something else. Why does the subject of racism make you feel so uncomfortable?
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
@Padawanbater2 Thanks for liking this post so I could find it again.

@Fogdog @UncleBuck this is the original post, in its entirety. Chipping off the first statement is taking it out of context.

The point I was trying to make- poorly, it seems- is that a lot of people on both sides of any given racial divide deliberately talk it up to score points, rather than trying to solve anything. Y'all would be familiar with that tactic, considering how often you use it.

The sentence does not stand on its own in a vacuum. It only makes sense when the other two statements are also true, and we're certainly nowhere near there in this country.

I've had the experience of being eavesdropped upon by someone whose only interest is to twist something said out of context to try to accuse me of being racist without being involved in the conversation- when nothing of the sort was being discussed! It's shit like that I was referring to.

In no way do I advocate telling everyone to 'just shut up' about race. By itself that tactic would only serve to cement the divides that already exist.

Now, let's see if you two are men enough to accept your part of this manufactured misunderstanding- or if you'll just continue to prove the very point I was making.
Click to expand...
Your honor, I submit to this forum the point that reading @ttystikk 's posts is not the equivalent of eavesdropping.

The post @ttystikk refers to is quoted again in it's entirety.
ttystikk said:
I think that if everyone quit talking about race, part of the problem would be solved.

Another part would be solved if we truly treated each other as equals.

The final part would be solved if we came to terms with the history of racism and took steps not only to prevent it from ever happening again, but also to ensure both that those who are disadvantaged are made whole and everyone gets a fair shot moving forward.

These points may sound simple, but each masks a great deal of complexity and divisiveness.
Click to expand...
To tty, I ask the following:

You hold to three main points. Your first point is "if everyone quit talking about race, part of the problem would be solved"

As you say, "The sentence does not stand on its own in a vacuum. It only makes sense when the other two statements are also true, and we're certainly nowhere near there in this country."

What I don't understand is, how can white and black people come to terms with racism and treat others as equals if, as you say, "everyone quit talking about race".

Isn't this a contradiction?
 
ArcticGranite

ArcticGranite

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
you are illiterate.

i said spaghetti noodle was a mooch because of his multiple cancer treatments and that he does not subsidize anyone.

although i do sincerely wish that nazi fuck succumbs to cancer and soon. he is a nazi. that's more than a "political disagreement".
Click to expand...
Don't backpedal now. Own it. Own each and everytime and they're are countless posts of yours, wishing cancer recurrence/death, or stating Nazi cancer in your posts to me.

Your have made yourself a pariah with your own vitriol.
 
Michael Huntherz

Michael Huntherz

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
It is offensive and homophobic, you defender of white men.
Click to expand...
I am not sure he was defending white men in that context. I may have missed something, but let’s try to stay within some kind of conversational bounds. I am not indicating an endorsement of your opponent’s view, I am indicating a possible repositioning of the conversational goalposts.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Michael Huntherz said:
I am not sure he was defending white men in that context. I may have missed something, but let’s try to stay within some kind of conversational bounds. I am not indicating an endorsement of your opponent’s view, I am indicating a possible repositioning of the conversational goalposts.
Click to expand...
I wasn't addressing you. He did not apparently ask for your input.
 
B

bundee1

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
I'm not using the word to denigrate gay people. The way I'm using it has nothing to do with homosexuality.

If you think it's offensive, that's fine, but it's in no way homophobic
Click to expand...
Stop being so tone deaf fool. Its like calling someone the n word even though they're not black. You're using it in an offensive manner. And its black people you would be offending, not the intended target of your offense.
Get it now?
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Michael Huntherz said:
Well, you should probably be mad at me, then. What the fuck is wrong with the people on this site? You are a knot of abrasive assholes.
Click to expand...
You are one of the people on this site. I prefer abrasive people to liberal tone-police. Especially white guys who presume to tell me what I should be mad about and why. Is that why you addressed me? Is that why I have alerts from you?

Do you need fucking attention? What are you doing here sweetheart? It's politics and look who is president. Did you expect everyone to be fucking cheerful and to treat you like a hotel guest?

Get the fuck out of here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top