Trump's Supreme Court Pick..
- Thread starter schuylaar
- Start date
Big_Lou
Well-Known Member
Ugh. But not shocking. Can't he just die, instead?
Ready to throw up in your mouth?
Prophetic, eh?
dandyrandy
Well-Known Member
Your kidding
ArcticGranite
Well-Known Member
ArcticGranite
Well-Known Member
Gorsuch has a chance:
Judge Gorsuch’s best-known votes came in decisions concerning regulations under the Affordable Care Act requiring employers to provide free contraception coverage. He voted to accommodate religious objections to the regulations, a position largely upheld by the Supreme Court.
In general, Judge Gorsuch’s approach to the law mirrors that of Justice Scalia. He is an originalist, meaning he tries to interpret the Constitution consistently with the understanding of those who drafted and adopted it. And he is a textualist, focusing on the language of statutes rather than what lawmakers have had to say about them.
Judge Gorsuch’s best-known votes came in decisions concerning regulations under the Affordable Care Act requiring employers to provide free contraception coverage. He voted to accommodate religious objections to the regulations, a position largely upheld by the Supreme Court.
In general, Judge Gorsuch’s approach to the law mirrors that of Justice Scalia. He is an originalist, meaning he tries to interpret the Constitution consistently with the understanding of those who drafted and adopted it. And he is a textualist, focusing on the language of statutes rather than what lawmakers have had to say about them.
ArcticGranite
Well-Known Member
Pryor not so much:
Representing Alabama, Mr. Pryor in 2003 filed a supporting brief urging the Supreme Court to uphold a Texas law that made gay sex a crime. The position of the gay men challenging the law, Mr. Pryor wrote, “must logically extend to activities like prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia.”
“The states should not be required to accept, as a matter of constitutional doctrine, that homosexual activity is harmless and does not expose both the individual and the public to deleterious spiritual and physical consequences,” Mr. Pryor wrote in the brief.
Representing Alabama, Mr. Pryor in 2003 filed a supporting brief urging the Supreme Court to uphold a Texas law that made gay sex a crime. The position of the gay men challenging the law, Mr. Pryor wrote, “must logically extend to activities like prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia.”
“The states should not be required to accept, as a matter of constitutional doctrine, that homosexual activity is harmless and does not expose both the individual and the public to deleterious spiritual and physical consequences,” Mr. Pryor wrote in the brief.
ArcticGranite
Well-Known Member
Thank you Harry Reid
ArcticGranite
Well-Known Member
Nazi shill to you
ArcticGranite
Well-Known Member
@#countertop. you know what to do
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
that doesn't go for SCOTUS picks you inbred nazi.
try to learn how politics work before posting in politics, limp dick.
ArcticGranite
Well-Known Member
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
I saw him last night at Comet Ping Pong. He was eating a pizza.
srh88
Well-Known Member
Extra cheese
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
The man has no shame.
Speaking of bad Pies, have you noticed her forays onto RIU have been few and far between? She must be doin' ree-surch.