Two Conservative senators abstaining from pot vote because they stand to profit from it

gb123

Well-Known Member
Senators Linda Frum and Nicole Eaton reported financial conflicts to the Senate ethics officer


It's no secret that many Conservatives don't like Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's plans for pot.

On Wednesday, the Conservative leader in the Senate, Larry Smith, criticized the federal government's "rush to legalize marijuana."

A few days earlier, Conservative Senator Denise Batters said Canada is not ready for legalization and "Canadians will pay the price for that folly with their health and safety."

Two Conservative senators have had to keep their thoughts about legalization to themselves, however. Both Senator Linda Frum and Senator Nicole Eaton are abstaining from votes on the Cannabis Act because they stand to profit from legalization.

In filings posted on the Senate ethics officer's website, Frum and Eaton spell out their financial conflict.

In a letter dated May 1, Senator Eaton notes she has a conflict of interest over the bill to legalize recreational cannabis use and change the impaired driving rules "due to an impending investment in the cannabis industry."

Until she recused herself, Senator Eaton was participating in debates and committee work on legalization. In March, she attracted some unwanted attention when she suggested at committee that "five grams is about four tokes" and that if she were a 16 year old high school student, she might walk around with "four tokes in my pocket."

A 'toke' is commonly understood to refer to the act of inhaling marijuana smoke. The senator later clarified that she meant to say 'joint'.


Senator Nicole Eaton@SenNicoleEaton

https://twitter.com/SenNicoleEaton/status/976862566529011715

Just a clarification. I misspoke at Senate Legal committee. I said "toke", but I meant "joint" during questioning on Bill C-45. My point remains the same: children will be allowed to legally possess several joints of cannabis under the proposed federal law.

12:45 PM - Mar 22, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy




Senator Frum notes in letter dated January 30 that she is opposed to C-45, but writes that because she has a property that will be leased "for the purposes of selling recreational cannabis," she will recuse herself from all debate, deliberation and voting on the matter.

Frum's office responded to a request from CBC News with a statement. In it, she says that the province of New Brunswick informed her in December that it wanted to lease a vacant space from her to open up a marijuana dispensary.

"I immediately contacted the Senate Ethics and Conflict of Interest Officer, who stated that there was not a direct conflict of interest. However, out of an abundance of caution, I chose to recuse myself from Bill C-45 to avoid any perception or appearance of conflict."

CBC News also reached out to Senator Eaton's office and will update this story with a response if one is provided.

A Senate official confirms that no other members of the Senate have recused themselves from voting on C-45.

Tonight, the Senate will hold vote a major vote on whether to send the legislation — and dozens of proposed changes to it — back to the House of Commons. Failure to do so would stop the bill and the legalization project dead in its tracks.

The last Senate vote on the same legislation bill was a bit more of a nail-biter than supporters of the legislation might have wanted to see.

PM appoints senators just in time for C-45 vote
While no one knows precisely how Thursday's vote will turn out, two senators will spend their very first moments in the Red Chamber weighing in on the topic.

On Wednesday, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced he was appointing two new independent senators — Pierre Dalphond and Donna Dasko.

Both will be sworn in today and will be allowed to participate in the final vote on C-45.

The sponsor of the bill, Independent Senator Tony Dean, said he couldn't comment on the timing of the appointments or whether they might help ensure passage of the Cannabis Act.

"I have absolutely no idea," he said. "What I can tell you is, in the time that I've been here, there have been a number of vacancies. and I hoped that they would be filled."

The Prime Minister's Office pointed out that the senators were appointed the day before the vote and that the timing of the swearing-in was left to the discretion of the government House leader in the Senate.

"These senators were appointed upon the recommendation of the independent advisory board for Senate appointments. We will continue to make appointments to fill the vacancies as quickly as we can," said a statement from a PMO spokesman.
 

gwheels

Well-Known Member
Oh this will be a real indication. The vote must pass or someone will lose the ability to govern next election. I need popcorn
 

torontoke

Well-Known Member
Both will be sworn in today and will be allowed to participate in the final vote on C-45.

this is wrong
In fairness if everyone with conflicting interests weren’t allowed to vote there prolly wouldn’t be anyone left in the room able to vote.
And sadly the average person just buries their head in the sand and pretends like these conflicts aren’t happening all around us.
 

gb123

Well-Known Member
In fairness if everyone with conflicting interests weren’t allowed to vote there prolly wouldn’t be anyone left in the room able to vote.
And sadly the average person just buries their head in the sand and pretends like these conflicts aren’t happening all around us.
and some stand up...(:
 

CalyxCrusher

Well-Known Member
Oh this will be a real indication. The vote must pass or someone will lose the ability to govern next election. I need popcorn
I think the skeletons that have come to light from his closet recently will throw a wrench in re election plans
 
Top