You bet your ass I have a litmus test

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
And if you don't, I think you're a coward

My litmus test is pretty simple.. All it really entails and stipulates is that you don't take corporate money or super PAC money to fund your campaigns and that you join the rest of the modern world and support a system of universal healthcare that will cover all Americans

How unreasonable, right...?

If you accept corporate donations, what prevents you from garnering more influence to make decisions based upon your reelection financier?
 

Huckster79

Well-Known Member
I concur in theory however not always an option ar ballot box. In that case i choose the most progressive choice possible even with flaws... but yes i agree if it is an option.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
i knew you were a trump supporter.
I'm a Trump supporter because I posted a picture of Trump to illustrate the opinion that even a feckless retard like Donald Trump can beat the best the Democratic establishment has to offer? OK.. That makes perfect sense, after all...
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
oh, so you support a candidate so inept and feckless that they lose to an ESTABLISHMENT democrat?

lel
Well, losing a rigged game isn't really losing.. It's being cheated. I'd take Noam Chomsky's word over yours, anyone who wouldn't is hopelessly incapable of making informed decisions and honestly impresses me with their continued ability to figure out how their keyboard works.
i don't believe in wage slavery, one of the few places me and chomsky disagree.
 

srh88

Well-Known Member
oh, so you support a candidate so inept and feckless that they lose to an ESTABLISHMENT democrat?

lel
but she heard what kind of questions would be asked at the debate! you know, current issues.. the kind of thing anyone running for office should be able to answer
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
but she heard what kind of questions would be asked at the debate! you know, current issues.. the kind of thing anyone running for office should be able to answer
yeah, her 30 years of experience as a public servant would have left her totally unprepared for a question about lead in the water during a debate in flint michigan.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
that question was completely out of left field.. noone was expecting it
fucking rigged system man.

hey, watch this youtube video and you'll TOTALLY get why i support rawn bernard pawl sanders. rEVOLution freedom freedom liberty establishment donor class corporate.

i have won the debate
 

dandyrandy

Well-Known Member
My litmus test is the lack of understanding by some. I just got back from an evening out with my wife. We went to a local town with all white Appalachian folk. Ate at Frisch's. All if not most were fat, uneducated and trump supporters. The parenting has failed. Next we go to the local discount store. Same thing. I'm glad I moved away. But it's nice to go back and see why I made my decisions. And nothing was busy. End of the month and everyone is broke. Nice time to shop.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
but she heard what kind of questions would be asked at the debate! you know, current issues.. the kind of thing anyone running for office should be able to answer
“But here, where you have a party that’s saying, We’re gonna, you know, choose our standard bearer, and we’re gonna follow these general rules of the road, which we are voluntarily deciding, we could have — and we could have voluntarily decided that, Look, we’re gonna go into back rooms like they used to and smoke cigars and pick the candidate that way. That’s not the way it was done. But they could have. And that would have also been their right.”
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
yeah, her 30 years of experience as a public servant would have left her totally unprepared for a question about lead in the water during a debate in flint michigan.
So why did they bother with obstructing the bylaws of the DNC to give her campaign a question she already had in the bag? Why didn't they give the Sanders campaign the same respect?

Because they were trying to give her another advantage to beat him, thus obstructing the DNCs own bylaws to remain neutral
 
Top