Egzoset

Well-Known Member
Sorry for a need to use some on-line translator again...

M'well, Richard Bélanger happens to be a pediatrician at the CHU center of Québec city and he added more icing to his peculiar cake recently; it's been a long while after we saw/heard him across Canada's French-speaking TV network as one main guest of a very popular "science" show during the Harper period:

SRC: Quels sont les effets du cannabis sur le cerveau des adolescents? (2014-Nov-10)
Charles Tisseyre > Spécialiste de la médecine de l'adolescence, Richard Bélanger sait que ces risques trouvent souvent bien peu d'échos chez les jeunes.
Richard Bélanger > En clinique c'est pas tant ces choses-là qui font, euh... qui font peur aux adolescents. C'que les jeunes ont l'plus peur c'est les choses qui les touchent directement là. Ça va aussi avec le comportement adolescent, donc... J'les vois allumer quand j'parle, euh... de... d'augmentation d'la masse mammaire chez les garçons, de savoir ça, qu'y a une suppression donc qu'ça peut amener une... une poussée des seins chez les garçons - ce qu'on appelle la gynécomastie - ou à la limite une diminution d'la quantité de spermatozoïdes qu'y produisent... C'est quelque chose d'intéressant à savoir, p'is chez les filles ça augmente la prolactine, donc ça peut amener des montées laiteuses mais surtout ça diminue, euh... la fertilité et l'ovulation.
Avant toute chose il faut mettre ces risques en perspective. Au Québec près de 50 % des finissants au secondaire avouent avoir consommé du cannabis au cours de la dernière année. Au total jusqu'à 60 % d'la population adulte rapporte en avoir consommé au moins une fois.

Remember that?? I sure do. The short version was an echo of some 2013 CNN hoax which Ontario school police squads also refered to -- and later needed to retract publicly, e.g. for pretending that teenager males will grow a female breast and loose significant parts of their young masculine attributes over cannabis...

:roll:

Today the "hot" news from our holier-than-you canuck "spe¢iali$ts"/"expert$" will trumpet a mother's smoke can modify her foetus in such a durable manner her yet-to-be-born babie(s) must be doomed to grow fat, far later in their infancy life, once the exposure has long past, apparently:

LP: Attention au cannabis pendant la grossesse (2022-Apr-13)

Which is one of the ultimate taboo-shields on this mediatic war-field; also take note of the media's own propaganda-convenient title, by the way: "Le Progrès"!!

:hump:

So it seems "science" ain't the same everywhere when the People's House got stuffed unanimously, with fear mongering made a powerful engine of bigot prohibition since the Pharmacy Act of 1890... In The Name Of Children!

:sleep:
 

Egzoset

Well-Known Member
More sources added:


 

Dorian2

Well-Known Member
So to sum up that pregnant study. There were initially 1400 women tested and they whittled it down to 100 of the 1400 for their findings.

That ain't science. It's cherry picking. And I'm not taking sides. I just hate bullshit.
 

hotrodharley

Well-Known Member
I’m 72 and did genuine LSD from 66-72. Hundreds of times. Blotter of every kind including Owsley. Orange Sunshine, Purple Haze. The scare propaganda back then sounded crazy then and has proven to be 100% bullshit. No permanent trips. For anyone including the wackiest of us. Nobody jumped from a window. Except once but it was on the ground floor and he wanted out so . .. Biggest of all later was none of us had kids with birth defects. That was the other “promise” from the Nixon administration.
 
Top