Cree photophyll and pro 9 colors

photophyll looks like crees spin on samsungs evo "mints", great if your only chasing efficiency not so great if you value spectrum.
One would almost say the opposite. It's spectral as much as efficacy based compared to plain mint. The whole point is to be able to target all blue, green, and red ratios more directly/independently as well as in the most efficient ways to do them. The white photophylls allows change to B:G ratio without affecting red content. With more efficient red diodes like XPG3 photo reds plus the new horizon version's with the batwing optics allows great mixing of mid power whites and high power reds at lower hanging heights.
the pro 9's are cob and high power form factor only no mid powers.
Pro9 is available across the board from CREE. Mid power too, G and J class no issue. If you bought enough(10M+) of the new 3030's, they would add pro9 to them I'm sure. But of the DIY'er or a guy looking at localk CM's for boards, G class 2835 pro9 will be the top dog.

Pro9= KSF phosphor. It's GE/Nichia licensed tech. Almost all companies offering it in some form.
Nichia, CREE, Samsung, Bridgelux, Citizen....all have forms of KSF in their lineups. It's not meant for hort, but its not bad. Color shift and max operating temps are not as good with KSF compared to standard CRI phosphor mixes, so horticulture isn't a great application for them. But the spectrums are good.
Nice ~640nm peak in the KSF and good LPW for the additional red input. Haven't seen a lumen to umol conversion factor for the KSF spectrums, but should be + for the µmol/w.
 

grotbags

Well-Known Member
One would almost say the opposite. It's spectral as much as efficacy based compared to plain mint. The whole point is to be able to target all blue, green, and red ratios more directly/independently as well as in the most efficient ways to do them. The white photophylls allows change to B:G ratio without affecting red content. With more efficient red diodes like XPG3 photo reds plus the new horizon version's with the batwing optics allows great mixing of mid power whites and high power reds at lower hanging heights.
i dont see how its the opposite?, they are more or less the same spectrum. apart from cree offering 3 different spectrums with differing amounts of blue. its clear this is a push for efficiency (the same as the mints) as they like you say strip out as much of the red from the whites as possible and add it back in via much more efficient 660 monos.

i agree though that cree's approach is better with the different blue levels, its just basic B:G:R ratios are a poor way of describing, designing or categorising spectrums.

Pro9 is available across the board from CREE. Mid power too, G and J class no issue. If you bought enough(10M+) of the new 3030's, they would add pro9 to them I'm sure. But of the DIY'er or a guy looking at localk CM's for boards, G class 2835 pro9 will be the top dog.

Pro9= KSF phosphor. It's GE/Nichia licensed tech. Almost all companies offering it in some form.
Nichia, CREE, Samsung, Bridgelux, Citizen....all have forms of KSF in their lineups. It's not meant for hort, but its not bad. Color shift and max operating temps are not as good with KSF compared to standard CRI phosphor mixes, so horticulture isn't a great application for them. But the spectrums are good.
Nice ~640nm peak in the KSF and good LPW for the additional red input. Haven't seen a lumen to umol conversion factor for the KSF spectrums, but should be + for the µmol/w.
i didnt see the pro 9's in the 2835... interesting... i doubt colour shift or max operating temps would be an issue as long as they arent driven hard.
 

Rocket Soul

Well-Known Member
From the cree blurb about these: i understood that theyre targeting stable red % content in order to make it easier to calculate how much more red to add thru monos.

On that spikey 90cri spectrum: ive only ever seen it tested once at led-tech (bridgelux F90) and it looks like the diodes are slightly less efficient than standard blux 90cris (as per tests here on riu, though the question is are the tests like for like?). Their spectrum looks juicy but if you overlay the standard 90cri spectrum its not necessarily as attractive.
 

grotbags

Well-Known Member
r
From the cree blurb about these: i understood that theyre targeting stable red % content in order to make it easier to calculate how much more red to add thru monos.

On that spikey 90cri spectrum: ive only ever seen it tested once at led-tech (bridgelux F90) and it looks like the diodes are slightly less efficient than standard blux 90cris (as per tests here on riu, though the question is are the tests like for like?). Their spectrum looks juicy but if you overlay the standard 90cri spectrum its not necessarily as attractive.
are you saying the blux f90's are using the same ksf phosphor that the pro 9's are using?. can you remember what the numbers were for eficiency?.
 

Rocket Soul

Well-Known Member
r

are you saying the blux f90's are using the same ksf phosphor that the pro 9's are using?. can you remember what the numbers were for eficiency?.
Im not sure but id imagine the numbers being similar over brands

For efficiency numbers you can use TEKNIKs here onsite (i think they should come up in bridgelux eb gen3 in the search option) and the ones on led-techs web for f90. Iirc correct standard ebs 90cri 2700k came out as 2.66 and a little lower for F90; but i dont know much about testing equipment and conditions for led-techs testing.
 

Rocket Soul

Well-Known Member
Im not sure but id imagine the numbers being similar over brands

For efficiency numbers you can use TEKNIKs here onsite (i think they should come up in bridgelux eb gen3 in the search option) and the ones on led-techs web for f90. Iirc correct standard ebs 90cri 2700k came out as 2.66 and a little lower for F90; but i dont know much about testing equipment and conditions for led-techs testing.


Theyre quite comparable since both designs are based on 7 led string. Dont know about led tdch but teknik always did tests at continuous operation
 
KSF has been around a long time, Cree first used it in 2017 in COBs called "etone" for those who have been around long enough. But GE/nichia put a stop to that legally.
Now days it's coming back as the tech and legalities behind it, have been stabilized for the most part. GE/Nichia's licensing system is in place and ready to collect.

The gist of KSF is...get 80CRI efficacy(lpw) out of a 90cri part. So to the comments above, efficiency is actually up over standard 90cri by quite a bit. Not down.

As for how its done, there are 3 companies making KSF phosphor, but only 1 that has true patent to do it right.

Intematix - Lowest grade, stabilty, and major legal issues. B-lux getting sued because of using this, so don't expect f90 to last as it is for much longer.
Mitsubishi - Samsung uses. Mid grade and major color instability(not just shift...degradation of the phosphor). Also getting legal pressure from GE. Samsung already took S90 off the market this year. Will return late this, or early next year after licensing GEs blend.
GE/Nichia- The real deal, hold patent and licensing all others are trying to work around. Best and most stable KSF phosphor by far. What CREE, nichia, and a few others use. Eventually all will use due to quality and legal status. Worth it to pay the piper here.
 
Last edited:
Yes, in lum/w but not in photons per watt according to testing cited.
Only thing from Teknik is standard 90cri EB strip. Where are his KSF test? I can just ask him myself, but youre saying its there in that link?
Led-Tech only having f90 or thrive of their own board to compare.
 
Last edited:

Rocket Soul

Well-Known Member
Only thing from Teknik is standard 90cri EB strip. Where are his KSF test? I can just ask him myself, but youre saying its there in that link?
Led-Tech only having f90 or thrive of their own board to compare.
No ksf from teknik. Just looking for the best numbers we can get. Previously there were regular blux 2700k 90cri available thru led-tech which also scored slightly better than f90 in photon/w.
 
Here is a consistent look at the phosphor techs over the same LED chip in the pic/attachment
Cree G-class 2835 in 80cri, 90cri, and pro9 in 4000K CCT. The table is specifically in radiometric output. As you can see the pro9 is putting out more energy across the board. Then 80cri, followed by standard 90cri putting out the least.

Now I have requested a conversion factor from my cree guy to keep it apples to apples as much as possible, but for now the only KSF conversion I can get is just now from LED-Tech test and working it backwards. But is probably close enough for us to see here what is going on. But will update here when cree responds.

Conversion factors( ppf/flux)
4K80= 0.014034 (from cree PCT)
4K90= 0.015403 (from cree PCT)
4Kf90= 0.013551243835875 (LED-tech: 68.92µmols/5085.88lm)

So if we use 70ma(.188w) flux for instance and calculate µmol/w( flux*conversion.../wattage )
4K80(40.5lm flux@70ma)= 40.5*0.014034)/.188 = 3.02µmols/w
4K90(34.9lm flux@70ma)= 34.9*0.015403/.188 = 2.86µmols/w
4Kf90(38.6lm flux@70ma)= 38.6*0.013551243835875 /.188 = 2.78µmols/w

Very interesting! Would have expected the 640nm potassium peak to bring more weight photonically. Will report back what conversion Cree gives me, but I expect it to be within margin of error.
 

Attachments

Last edited:

grotbags

Well-Known Member
Here is a consistent look at the phosphor techs over the same LED chip in the pic/attachment
Cree G-class 2835 in 80cri, 90cri, and pro9 in 4000K CCT. The table is specifically in radiometric output. As you can see the pro9 is putting out more energy across the board. Then 80cri, followed by standard 90cri putting out the least.

Now I have requested a conversion factor from my cree guy to keep it apples to apples as much as possible, but for now the only KSF conversion I can get is just now from LED-Tech test and working it backwards. But is probably close enough for us to see here what is going on. But will update here when cree responds.

Conversion factors( ppf/flux)
4K80= 0.014034 (from cree PCT)
4K90= 0.015403 (from cree PCT)
4Kf90= 0.013551243835875 (LED-tech: 68.92µmols/5085.88lm)

So if we use 70ma(.188w) flux for instance and calculate µmol/w( flux*conversion.../wattage )
4K80(40.5lm flux@70ma)= 40.5*0.014034)/.188 = 3.02µmols/w
4K90(34.9lm flux@70ma)= 34.9*0.015403/.188 = 2.86µmols/w
4Kf90(38.6lm flux@70ma)= 38.6*0.013551243835875 /.188 = 2.78µmols/w

Very interesting! Would have expected the 640nm potassium peak to bring more weight photonically. Will report back what conversion Cree gives me, but I expect it to be within margin of error.
exellent info... thanks for that.
 

Jonesfamily7715

Well-Known Member
Thankyou guys for all the info Ive been a little hesitant to buy pro 9 stuff because of the funky looking spectrum but after reading this it makes more sense.
 

grotbags

Well-Known Member
Thankyou guys for all the info Ive been a little hesitant to buy pro 9 stuff because of the funky looking spectrum but after reading this it makes more sense.
how are you thinking of using the pro 9's? as a standalone or mixing it with another white midpower and/or monos?.
 

grotbags

Well-Known Member
i had a quick play with led-tech system configurator , i used the 3000k blux f90 as a stand in for the pro 9's and added mint evo's at a ratio of approx 2:1 (2 f90 to 1 evo mint), then added some monos to fill it out.

1715423755351.png

using the 3000k pro 9's should lift the efficiency a bit and fatten out the non mono covered area of the red spectrum (630 -730nm).
 
Top