FNG Grower
Well-Known Member
I'm going to change up my lighting scheme with this new batch, and I wanted to get everyone's input. Last grow, I flowered four plants in a 4x4 area with a 1000W HPS and two T5-HO fixtures (4-bulb, 4-foot = 20k lumens/each) for side lighting. The plants did well, but I noticed that the buds nearest the T5's had the best looking trichomes and healthiest leaves. HPS has a very limited spectrum, and the T5's gave the plants something extra. Fluorescent light doesn't penetrate much more than 12", so the buds in the middle of the cluster received high intensity 2000K spectrum from the HPS but virtually nothing from the 6400K T5's, and those buds did not turn out as well. Many growers on this forum use both HPS and metal halide for flowering and swear that their quality is better than HPS alone, so I'm considering a couple of 400W MH fixtures to replace the T5's.
Questions:
Do you think that the 400W MH will penetrate further into the canopy than the T5's? Of the many color spectrums offered in MH bulbs, which do you think would best complement the HPS (3000K, 6500K, 7200K, 10,000K)? Is a 600W HPS plus two 400W MH better than a 1000W HPS plus two 216W T5's (considering the power bill)? Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Questions:
Do you think that the 400W MH will penetrate further into the canopy than the T5's? Of the many color spectrums offered in MH bulbs, which do you think would best complement the HPS (3000K, 6500K, 7200K, 10,000K)? Is a 600W HPS plus two 400W MH better than a 1000W HPS plus two 216W T5's (considering the power bill)? Any suggestions would be appreciated.