ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
Is the goverment against you fucking kids.
Oh you poor thing
This is gonna get interesting! Militia takes over Ore. federal building after protest.
- Thread starter Uncle Ben
- Start date
Oh you poor thing
rkymtnman
Well-Known Member
similar to the GOP's attempt to repeal the ACA, unless you have something better, status quo it is.
who would you like to protect the blm land? armed citizens? smoky the bear? chuck norris? space aliens?
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
The people that reside there and mix their labor with it to create value are the people that have the highest interest in the land wouldn't you say?
There are two legitimate ways to acquire property that I can think of in this instance. Either trade something of value to the occupants in a mutual exchange or occupy and improve previously unowned land. Which of these two modes did / does the Federal Government use when they laid claim to most of the western lands east of the Mississippi ?
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
Yes child molesting should be prohibited.
Why are you crying about it?
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
My guess is they want to use the kids as collateral to be used against parents consuming a plant, Prohibitionist.
I'm a little uncomfortable talking to you though, since you are an admitted prohibitionist and seem obsessed with conversations about boinking kids. I'm afraid I find your topics somewhat disconcerting and characteristic of a foul and over bearing person. (that's bad by the way...Prohibitionist)
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
Today the Oregon terrorists turn themselves in. It's over
Cliven Bundy got arrested as well.
Cliven Bundy got arrested as well.
Last edited:
rkymtnman
Well-Known Member
most blm land is unoccupied.
so back to my question, who should protect it, if not the gov't?
Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
He said no he does not approve. Learn to read.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
Ask him If a child of 13 can consent to sex with an adult?
His answer is yes. If you agree with him. You are an unfit mother
Not GOP
Well-Known Member
Rob Roy says "ability to consent", you put it as "13 year old can consent", which is basically the same thing, illegal, and completely different from believing it is morally wrong to have sex with a 13 year old. Seeing as how Rob would refuse to have sex with a 13 year old, consensual or otherwise; I don't see your argument...
Last edited:
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
He also says of you intervene between a 13 year old and an adult having sex YOU are the molester
Not GOP
Well-Known Member
Is that a quote from Rob Roy?
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
YES VERBATIM
Honestly. What part of Rob Roy thinks it Should be legal for adults to have sex with kids, don't You understand?
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
Bullshit, Cheebs is a liar and never cites proof to back up his claims. He also has chronic halitosis and a severe case of micropenis.
doublejj
Well-Known Member
Maybe rob is 14.......when I was 14 I wanted a 13 year old in the worst way.....
Not GOP
Well-Known Member
By the literal definition of "molest", that would be technically correct, seeing as how interfere and molest are synonyms,
If I had a 13 year old daughter, you're damn right I'd molest the situation immediately.
What he has done is purposely use the word "molester" out of context, in order to get you all riled up. And it's working. You have been going on and on about this for as long as I've been a member, probably longer.
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
Of course a child can consent to sex with an adult. It happens quite frequently. Will there be legal repercussions if the adult takes action on that consent? Of course.
Now, if you meant to ask if a child can "legally" consent to sex with an adult, then the answer is no. But, as we all know, you're not very good at this typing your thoughts thing...or just thinking for that matter.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
Ask him yourselfMaybe rob is 14.......when I was 14 I wanted a 13 year old in the worst way.....
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
Ask him yourself