EXCUSE ME?!..The OFFICIAL Bernie Sanders For President 2016 Thread

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Of all the people running for POTUS, who has the most votes ? We talking populace vote. Hint: It is not Trump nor Bernie
Who has the most populace? Are you talking about current populace that has already voted (the Deep South) or are you going to include ALL states?

The race is FAR from over..the progressive states still get their say.

Is that washer out of balance?..better go check after you've finished your quarter counting..
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
And plenty authoritarian, Mrs 'bring them to heel';
View attachment 3657656
Wasn't even interested in minimum wage increase until pressured by sanders..$12? Yes she'll TRY..

That's Wall St speak for 'swift boot in the ass is what you'll get'.

I hope she dies of something painful like ovarian cancer.

Further, if sanders doesn't make the general..I'm NOT rallying around the party or Clinton..I'm a registered independent and no one in my party is running. Period!

Sanders supporters will not betray the message and if they vote for Clinton they are doing just that.

Rotsa Ruck, Hillary @londonfog @ChesusRice:lol:
 
Last edited:

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Hillary is not Republican
Well, she is in an old school way. Not the foam at the mouth raving wingnuts of today. More like the Eisenhower Republican of the 1950's though. The Democratic Party establishment wants it all. They are even buying off small change like you with the promise of low taxes even though those so called low taxes are really tax deferrals. With the GOP sealed off in the upper right corner of the political landscape and a threat to all life on the planet, there is no reason for the Democratic party to work for votes in the moderate or liberal portions of US politics.

I can hear her basically saying, "what's good for Goldman Sachs is good for the country". Or fill in Goldman-Sachs with Exxon or Walmart. In Eisenhower's day it was General Motors, a unionized manufacturer that employed a huge workforce, instead of a vampire squid. Which puts Eisenhower to the left of Clinton.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Except he knows where he's getting the money from..sooooo not so Pollyanna.
Speaking personally, I'm voting for real change. Scary change. BIG change, the kind that gets the establishment all riled up because they can't keep their cozy positions ripping off the system change.

That's not Mrs Clinton. Nor is it anyone from the chief apologists for the trampling of our civil rights republicans.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Lol @Fogdog's 'vampire squid'

Adjective Of The Day!
Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stones Mag, 2010. A classic and a good read.

The first thing you need to know about Goldman Sachs is that it's everywhere. The world's most powerful investment bank is a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money. In fact, the history of the recent financial crisis, which doubles as a history of the rapid decline and fall of the suddenly swindled dry American empire, reads like a Who's Who of Goldman Sachs graduates.

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-great-american-bubble-machine-20100405#ixzz45vIEDX6u
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stones Mag, 2010. A classic and a good read.

The first thing you need to know about Goldman Sachs is that it's everywhere. The world's most powerful investment bank is a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money. In fact, the history of the recent financial crisis, which doubles as a history of the rapid decline and fall of the suddenly swindled dry American empire, reads like a Who's Who of Goldman Sachs graduates.

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-great-american-bubble-machine-20100405#ixzz45vIEDX6u
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook
Oh yeah, and none other than Hank Paulson, Mr Goldman Sachs himself, was appointed TREASURY SECRETARY?!

If the American people don't revolt, maybe they don't deserve their freedom...

...which neatly explains why we don't have any, anymore.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Oh yeah, and none other than Hank Paulson, Mr Goldman Sachs himself, was appointed TREASURY SECRETARY?!

If the American people don't revolt, maybe they don't deserve their freedom...

...which neatly explains why we don't have any, anymore.
We may agree politically but I don't think it's as dire as you say here. I kind of feel like giving a pep talk like Blutarski's,

Hey, what the hell is this shit. Its not over until we decide it's over. Was it over when the Germans bombed Pear Harbor? Hell no.
This situation requires a stupid and really futile gesture on somebody's part! And we're just the ones to do it.
 
Last edited:

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
We may agree politically but I don't think it's as dire as you say here. I kind of feel like giving a pep talk like Blutarski's,

Hey, what the hell is this shit. Its not over until we decide it's over. Was it over when the Germans bombed Pear Harbor? Hell no.
This situation requires a stupid and really futile gesture on somebody's part! And we're just the ones to do it.
There's plenty of people voting for Donald the Chump already, so I think we have the stupid, futile gesture thing covered. For now.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Voting for him would be just as stupid and futile as voting for the Chump, right? LOL
Stupid and futile, I think, is not voting at all or a protest vote which is what I'm considering, assuming Bernie doesn't make the ticket.

The Trump voters actually think he can win. So, just stupid.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Polls from yesterday (4-14)
The former secretary of state boasts a 17 point lead over Sanders, 57 percent to his 40 percent, according to an NBC/Wall Street Journal/Marist poll released on Thursday. That's a small increase over a poll the group released earlier this week showing Clinton with a 14-point edge over the Vermont senator.

Thursday’s poll finds that Clinton — who was a New York senator prior to becoming secretary of state — leads with women (60 percent to 37 percent), men (53 percent to 44 percent), non-whites (58 percent to 39 percent), and people ages 45 and older (67 percent to 29 percent).

Sanders leads with people under 45 (55 percent to 42 percent) and people who consider themselves “very liberal” (53 percent to 46 percent).

Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/04/clintons-lead-widens-in-new-york-221976#ixzz45vhcYta5


Bernie needs to win and by the kind of margin Clinton holds in this recent poll. Not saying it can't be done but it doesn't look good.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Who has the most populace? Are you talking about current populace that has already voted (the Deep South) or are you going to include ALL states?

The race is FAR from over..the progressive states still get their say.

Is that washer out of balance?..better go check after you've finished your quarter counting..
This race is over, you're just such a fanatic you can't see it.
 
Top