Canada could become the first country to allow unlimited possession of cannabis in private

cookie master

Well-Known Member
While you will only be able to grow 4 plants at a time and will only have the ability to possess up to 30 grams of dried cannabis or its equivalent in public, Canada will become the first country to forego a limit on the amount of recreational marijuana you will be allowed to possess privately, according to the first draft of the Cannabis Act.

This starkly contrasts other legalized recreational and even medicinal markets in the United States and around the world, which typically have legal possession limits that apply even in private settings.

In Uruguay, the only other federal jurisdiction in the world to legalize recreational cannabis, there is a presumptive personal possession limit of 40 grams, anything above which could put an individual in legal jeopardy; individuals can only buy up to that amount each month at pharmacies. For individuals that cultivate inside their home, there is a limit of 480 grams that can be harvested annually from up to six plants.

The lack of an inherent private possession limit in Canada's proposed plan is a curious fact: a laissez-faire approach within a legalization plan that is otherwise strict. With approximately 45 offences, there will be around 7 times more offences that you can be charged with than what currently exists for cannabis. Public possession of more than 30 grams can theoretically be punished with 5 years of jail time, while no possession limit is placed, at least in the federal draft of the law, on the amount you can possess in private.

Health Canada spokesperson André Gagnon confirmed to Lift News that there is no limit on the amount of cannabis that could be possessed in private dwellings.

It’s always possible that the provinces will enact their own limits within their respective borders in order to curb private possession and trafficking. In the past, some provinces have enacted outright possession limits on tobacco products, while it appears that no province has put such a limit on alcohol possession. But it’s equally likely that at least some provinces won’t impose such a limit. For example, Ontario has no limits on possessing those other sin-taxed products.

In a Frequently Asked Questions document on the Government of Canada’s legalization page, one question asks, “Why is there a 30 gram limit for public possession of cannabis, and why is there seemingly no limit in a private dwelling? There is no limit for alcohol.”

While the answer provided doesn’t actually spell out why there is no limit in a private dwelling, it is quick to note though that “30 grams of legal dried cannabis is a reasonable amount to be carried in public by an adult.” It then adds that it is a “reasonable limit” that “allows adults to carry legal cannabis or cannabis products with them when traveling between private dwellings.”

As legalization comes to be implemented, some law enforcement efforts may be hampered by the lack of a limit on private possession, but the new laws do criminalize any unauthorized sale outside of the regime, including distribution above 30 grams. Another consequence may be that despite the height limit on the four plants you can grow, there appears to be no limit on the amount you are able to harvest from those plants. This aspect would be much like Colorado, where you can produce an unlimited yield from up to 6 plants, but that state only allows you to store the yield of the harvest at the place of cultivation. Otherwise, possession of more than 28 grams, both publicly and privately, is illegal in Colorado.
It wont last, you will try and export it like the fuckers in cali, michigan, and colorado do. So when you do that shit we will treat canadians like Mexicans. Keep yoour weed oop north, we dont need it. Some assholes will grow 10 million plants in a greenhouse though, like the flavorless canadian tomatoes we get here in the store.
 

WHATFG

Well-Known Member
It wont last, you will try and export it like the fuckers in cali, michigan, and colorado do. So when you do that shit we will treat canadians like Mexicans. Keep yoour weed oop north, we dont need it. Some assholes will grow 10 million plants in a greenhouse though, like the flavorless canadian tomatoes we get here in the store.
Then please, grow your own tomatoes.
 

GrowRock

Well-Known Member
It wont last, you will try and export it like the fuckers in cali, michigan, and colorado do. So when you do that shit we will treat canadians like Mexicans. Keep yoour weed oop north, we dont need it. Some assholes will grow 10 million plants in a greenhouse though, like the flavorless canadian tomatoes we get here in the store.
Please treat us Canucks like Mexicans and build a wall:bigjoint:we will even help lol
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
This country managed to beat back the corporatists in the 1930s without bloodshed.

Taking our country back can and should be done through the polls, not armed insurrection.
While that would be nice, it's not even a remote possibility imo. You can change governments through polls, but it won't change who they work for. The voters and taxpayers merely choose which corporate puppet is going to be the figurehead. Politicians are bought and sold like Google stock and until we change that, nothing is going to improve.
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
It wont last, you will try and export it like the fuckers in cali, michigan, and colorado do. So when you do that shit we will treat canadians like Mexicans. Keep yoour weed oop north, we dont need it. Some assholes will grow 10 million plants in a greenhouse though, like the flavorless canadian tomatoes we get here in the store.
"flavourless Canadian Tomatoes" - I wasn't aware we had a major export in tomatoes to the states. Oh well, it can't be as bad as the recycled donkey piss Americans sell as beer.
Speaking of keeping your shit in your own country, great job in releasing Atlantic salmon into our waters to destroy the Pacific stock. Some asshole decided to raise millions of fish in an unsecured and substandard net right next to Canadian waters. You will be paying to compensate the Canadian fishery for a long time. Enjoy.
 

gb123

Well-Known Member
It wont last, you will try and export it like the fuckers in cali, michigan, and colorado do. So when you do that shit we will treat canadians like Mexicans. Keep yoour weed oop north, we dont need it. Some assholes will grow 10 million plants in a greenhouse though, like the flavorless canadian tomatoes we get here in the store.
if it says HOTHOUSE..dont buy the shit shwag maters!1 lol stuffs poison!
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
While that would be nice, it's not even a remote possibility imo. You can change governments through polls, but it won't change who they work for. The voters and taxpayers merely choose which corporate puppet is going to be the figurehead. Politicians are bought and sold like Google stock and until we change that, nothing is going to improve.
Then support candidates who will change it. That's what's happening here with the Progressive Movement, and that's why the establishment Democratic Party fears and loathes us so much.

Armed insurrection against the government will get you treated like a criminal- and rightly so.

Worse, your position implies that the average citizen is too stupid to be able to know what's best for them. While this might be true for some on an individual basis, it is not true collectively. Try to have a little faith, brother!
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Shes too busy trying to hide all that Clinton foundation money. Well, that and staring off into space like a stoned cat, and doing 100k speeches to banks
The question isn't how she lost; it's why it was ever even close to begin with, considering she lost to the single most unpopular president elect in modern American history.

You'll notice the establishment Democrats, here and elsewhere, will do anything not to answer that question directly.
 
Last edited:

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
It shoulda been Bernie...he was robbed.
The best thing that can be said for America's current situation is that it's now abundantly clear what an unfettered right wing America looks like.

The good news is that most Americans are finally aware of the stakes involved and many more are getting involved than ever before in my lifetime. This bodes well for the future.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Ummm..history wasnt my best subject but wasnt the US created by armed insurrection against the british government/monarchy?
We weren't given the choice of representation, were we?

Does the Boston Tea Party ring any bells?

Name a time in American history when armed insurrection against the US Government WAS effective?
 

redi jedi

Well-Known Member
We weren't given the choice of representation, were we?

Does the Boston Tea Party ring any bells?

Name a time in American history when armed insurrection against the US Government WAS effective?
Choice of representation?

Something to do with paying taxes...I think?

Has there ever been armed insurrection against the US government by its own citizens?...civil war maybe?
 

CalyxCrusher

Well-Known Member
Then support candidates who will change it. That's what's happening here with the Progressive Movement, and that's why the establishment Democratic Party fears and loathes us so much.

Armed insurrection against the government will get you treated like a criminal- and rightly so.

Worse, your position implies that the average citizen is too stupid to be able to know what's best for them. While this might be true for some on an individual basis, it is not true collectively. Try to have a little faith, brother!
Antifa being a prime example of such
 

CalyxCrusher

Well-Known Member
Bad examples can be as motivational as good ones.

Herr Chumpster Fuhrer is uniquely qualified for that, at least!
Im by no means a staunch supporter but I have yet to see any proof hes a nazi. Then again, it's thrown around so liberally nowadays people seem to misuse it freely. Usually by people who are confronted by people who have differing views who would rather label someone a nazi to avoid debate or criticism or even discussion. Because its easier to dismiss someone then question or confront. Not saying you specifically. Just stating what Ive seen daily since his election. Also 40%+ of your population didnt vote so........
 
Top