Cornel West Isn't Impressed With Barack Obama, Either

trippnface

Well-Known Member
Why would I be "butthurt?" The legalization initiative passed in California, cannabis is legal now! I've been fighting for that since before your mother was born, and if she knew that you called me a cunt, she would wash your mouth out with a bar of soap.

Also brainiac, if you were banned, you would not be posting here.

Since you called me a cunt, I will go sulk in my misery. :lol:


:mrgreen:

Nice!

So how many plants are you growing outside?

So how much Cannabis can you legally carry, and bring back from the dispo?

My apologies, that was the mod of thcfarmer that banned me... who also got real mad when his shilling of prop 64 was questioned....

Nothing changed man. Prop 64 was a garbage bill, written by garbage people, funded & supported by garbage people.

Literally every single individual throwing their weight behind 64 is a Neoliberal. 64 was a flat out Neoliberal bill.

Your weak ass argument that I was against legalization is absolutely pathetic.

I was against the Corporatization & Mass Commercialization from Monopolistic entities in unity with out corrupt State Government.

So were a great many of other Californians... from the ages of 18 well into their 80's.

Attempting to challenge my stance based on me being " 26" is honestly a middle school argument.

Surely you can do better?
 

trippnface

Well-Known Member
That's fake news.

Why did the Palestinians elect such an extreme group in the first place?


Is that why she got more votes?

" More votes"?

It is 100% verified information the DNC was cheating to allow Clinton leadership the entire time. The entire party was united around making sure Sanders did not win.

You don't actually expect me to believe that hillary clinton got more votes than Sanders in CA?

I know hundreds of individuals that refuse to vote in every election, and specifically came out to vote for bernie in this one.

If I know one thing for sure, it is that Hillary Clinton won nothing.

If you are refering to the popular vote ( which We have no reason to believe she won fairly). Liars are liars, and hillary is queen liar.

The popular vote is irrelevent. The president is not chosen on the popular vote.

Obama won the majority of the USA, Hillary did not. Nothing unfair about it.
 

Moldy

Well-Known Member
" More votes"?

It is 100% verified information the DNC was cheating to allow Clinton leadership the entire time. The entire party was united around making sure Sanders did not win.

You don't actually expect me to believe that hillary clinton got more votes than Sanders in CA?

I know hundreds of individuals that refuse to vote in every election, and specifically came out to vote for bernie in this one.

If I know one thing for sure, it is that Hillary Clinton won nothing.

If you are refering to the popular vote ( which We have no reason to believe she won fairly). Liars are liars, and hillary is queen liar.

The popular vote is irrelevent. The president is not chosen on the popular vote.

Obama won the majority of the USA, Hillary did not. Nothing unfair about it.
Guess you never been in jail then?
 

trippnface

Well-Known Member
Guess you never been in jail then?
either through luck or paranoia, correct!

Relevence?
No. It is a form of nationalism and while it blends well with right-wing socioeconomic policies in present form, it can also be a useful tool for leftist rascals.

Zionism is definitely Nationalism, problem is, Palestine does not belong to Israel.

So instead, that makes Zionism nothing more than an Imperialist invasion of Religious extremists.

Zionism is definitely a tool of the " left" as well.... only as far as those "leftists" are clearly not leftists, at all.

They are actually Neoliberals.

True Liberals do not support Zionism. Serious Jews do not even support ZIonism. Zionists support Zionism.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
" More votes"?

It is 100% verified information the DNC was cheating to allow Clinton leadership the entire time. The entire party was united around making sure Sanders did not win.

You don't actually expect me to believe that hillary clinton got more votes than Sanders in CA?

I know hundreds of individuals that refuse to vote in every election, and specifically came out to vote for bernie in this one.

If I know one thing for sure, it is that Hillary Clinton won nothing.

If you are refering to the popular vote ( which We have no reason to believe she won fairly). Liars are liars, and hillary is queen liar.

The popular vote is irrelevent. The president is not chosen on the popular vote.

Obama won the majority of the USA, Hillary did not. Nothing unfair about it.
You're like a retarded fish flapping about on the shore.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
either through luck or paranoia, correct!

Relevence?



Zionism is definitely Nationalism, problem is, Palestine does not belong to Israel.

So instead, that makes Zionism nothing more than an Imperialist invasion of Religious extremists.

Zionism is definitely a tool of the " left" as well.... only as far as those "leftists" are clearly not leftists, at all.

They are actually Neoliberals.

True Liberals do not support Zionism. Serious Jews do not even support ZIonism. Zionists support Zionism.
You seem to like to try to use words though you demonstrate that you do not know exactly what they mean.

Zionism is nationalism for Jews. You don't have to be Jewish to be Zionist and you don't have to be Zionist to be Jewish. In the case of Judaism it is different from other forms of chauvinistic nationalism because Judaism is a religion and also a an ethnic group but the two don't have perfect overlap. I don't disagree with all you've said but Zionism is most certainly not "a far right philosophy" as you say. It is a form of nationalism. Also, please learn what the left/right paradigm is and its historical context.

I'm not such a big fan of Nolan charts as I was for a short period a few years ago but they do have their uses. In this case, Zionism is a horizontal line on a Nolan chart. It can be left or right. It can not be libertarian. It can only exist through gov't force.

The Zionist state has been abetted by left wing governments that support Jewish nationalism. I'm guessing your Hebrew is rusty...
 

trippnface

Well-Known Member
You seem to like to try to use words though you demonstrate that you do not know exactly what they mean.

Zionism is nationalism for Jews. You don't have to be Jewish to be Zionist and you don't have to be Zionist to be Jewish. In the case of Judaism it is different from other forms of chauvinistic nationalism because Judaism is a religion and also a an ethnic group but the two don't have perfect overlap. I don't disagree with all you've said but Zionism is most certainly not "a far right philosophy" as you say. It is a form of nationalism. Also, please learn what the left/right paradigm is and its historical context.

I'm not such a big fan of Nolan charts as I was for a short period a few years ago but they do have their uses. In this case, Zionism is a horizontal line on a Nolan chart. It can be left or right. It can not be libertarian. It can only exist through gov't force.

The Zionist state has been abetted by left wing governments that support Jewish nationalism. I'm guessing your Hebrew is rusty...

I think I will take Einsteins word over yours, yeah?

https://archive.org/details/AlbertEinsteinLetterToTheNewYorkTimes.December41948

"Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergence in the newly created state of Israel of the "Freedom Party" (Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formed out of the membership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine."

"It was formed out of the membership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine."

"a terrorist, right-wing"

"right-wing"
 
Top