Is Biden really that bad?

Status
Not open for further replies.

wil2279

Well-Known Member
There's every reason to be nasty



Well this day this liberal is telling you "up yours"
Hmm... Sounds like something a nazi would say... If you don't look like me or talk like me I will round you up into camps and have you killed... Yep... Definitely sounds like the party of tolerance and acceptance to me. :lol:
 

V256.420

Well-Known Member
I walk around my house naked with all the windows open and the curtains pulled back. Is this against the law?
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Really? Cuz you do know if was the republicans who originally freed the slaves? And I'm not racist at all... And I voted for Trump!
gtfo, the "republicans" at the time of the civil war were an entirely different party with entirely different goals, and used different means to achieve those goals...
"The American party system was in crazy flux during the decade or two leading up to the Civil War. There were more pro-slavery Democrats than pro-slavery Whigs, and the anti-slavery Democrats tended to be noticeably less passionate about it, but both parties were divided on the issue. The Whigs, however, were solidly in favor of a strong national government and federal spending on “internal improvements,” and they mostly ended up in the new Republican Party, along with free-soilers, some of whom were former, usually Northern, Democrats. When the South seceded, one result was that Whiggish policies on economic and infrastructure issues suddenly commanded reliable majorities in the shrunken Congress.
Parallels to the present are inexact. Even so, and leaving slavery and race entirely aside, the salient Republican policies of the mid-1860s (activist “big” government, pro-income tax, pro-economic intervention) more or less match up to the Democratic policies of the early 2010s, while the Democratic policies of a century and a half ago (small “limited” government, pro-localism, pro-states’ rights) bear a striking resemblance to contemporary Republican shibboleths."

https://www.newyorker.com/news/hendrik-hertzberg/republicans-then-and-now
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member


unfunded tax cuts are like deferred maintenance on a house.

Republicans are dumbasses. They buy into the lie every time.
 

Lucky Luke

Well-Known Member
Oh so I should watch channels like cnn that got totally busted via spy cam admitting to reporting on things that made trump and republican candidates look bad even if there wasn't much truth to them while at the same time admitted to avoiding stories that made politicians they liked, look bad? Ok yeah gotcha. :clap:
You can watch whatever you like I'm just in Australia and know Sky news.

 

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
I wish I could make a poll in this thread. Who thinks red and blue, liberal and conservative, left and right is the master distraction? Who thinks we are improving quality of life? Who thinks our focus is on the right topics?
Our/my focus on this forum are events/actions that affect our lives & the World at large.
Totally up for debate, by one and all.
Too bad the Reds are assholes usually, but it gives me some pleasure I must admit proving/showing what actual fools they are.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Yeah!!! Except you call republicans Nazis because it sounds good... I'm calling you a nazi because you believe the same things the Nazis believe. :lol::lol::lol: crazy right? Nazis wanted to take away people's right to own guns and then they rounded up millions of Jews and killed them. And liberals want to take away republicans guns... Or the way if Nazis didn't like what you had to say, they would just kill you or something like that... It's sort of like the way liberals want to sensor everything we say... Unless you agree with them in that case you can talk as much as you like. Or when you call republicans racist because it sounds good.... But republicans actually freed the slaves and if liberals had their way we would still have slaves. It's like it's the same thing.... Only different huh? :lol::lol::lol:
i believe what nazis believed?... :lol: Your gun rights are more important than school kid's lives? you want me to believe the democrats want to take away the republican's guns so the republicans can't protect the Jews? ....:lol: democrats want to take away peoples right to free speech? aren't the republicans the ones who are burning and banning books they don't like? aren't they the ones trying to remove facts from history books because those facts make them uncomfortable, because they don't support their fantasy about being entitled via manifest destiny.....¿
 

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
i believe what nazis believed?... :lol: Your gun rights are more important than school kid's lives? you want me to believe the democrats want to take away the republican's guns so the republicans can't protect the Jews? ....:lol: democrats want to take away peoples right to free speech? aren't the republicans the ones who are burning and banning books they don't like? aren't they the ones trying to remove facts from history books because those facts make them uncomfortable, because they don't support their fantasy about being entitled via manifest destiny.....¿
gtfo, the "republicans" at the time of the civil war were an entirely different party with entirely different goals, and used different means to achieve those goals...
"The American party system was in crazy flux during the decade or two leading up to the Civil War. There were more pro-slavery Democrats than pro-slavery Whigs, and the anti-slavery Democrats tended to be noticeably less passionate about it, but both parties were divided on the issue. The Whigs, however, were solidly in favor of a strong national government and federal spending on “internal improvements,” and they mostly ended up in the new Republican Party, along with free-soilers, some of whom were former, usually Northern, Democrats. When the South seceded, one result was that Whiggish policies on economic and infrastructure issues suddenly commanded reliable majorities in the shrunken Congress.
Parallels to the present are inexact. Even so, and leaving slavery and race entirely aside, the salient Republican policies of the mid-1860s (activist “big” government, pro-income tax, pro-economic intervention) more or less match up to the Democratic policies of the early 2010s, while the Democratic policies of a century and a half ago (small “limited” government, pro-localism, pro-states’ rights) bear a striking resemblance to contemporary Republican shibboleths."

https://www.newyorker.com/news/hendrik-hertzberg/republicans-then-and-now
Well stated
Kudos :)
 

wil2279

Well-Known Member
i believe what nazis believed?... :lol: Your gun rights are more important than school kid's lives? you want me to believe the democrats want to take away the republican's guns so the republicans can't protect the Jews? ....:lol: democrats want to take away peoples right to free speech? aren't the republicans the ones who are burning and banning books they don't like? aren't they the ones trying to remove facts from history books because those facts make them uncomfortable, because they don't support their fantasy about being entitled via manifest destiny.....¿
Dude why is it that you libs always say I love my guns more than little kids? While at the same time you support abortion? You don't get how important the 2nd amendment is. Those who are ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it. There are literally dozens of examples of countries disarming their people and then within years... Rounding up and executing thousand s or millions of it's citizens. And everyone says well that would never happen here.... Well don't you think they said that in those countries too? Anyhow. My wife is from Brazil. Guns are illegal in Brazil. But guess what, her cousins husband still got his hands on a gun and shot her in the head. Taking away law abiding citizens guns doesn't take guns out of criminals hands. We have thousands of illegals coming across the southern border with drugs and all kinds of stuff. You gonna tell me nobody is bringing illegal guns across the border? If you can't pass a law that guarantees criminals don't have guns, then I'm not giving up my guns.
 

wil2279

Well-Known Member
That's all well and good. But a year and a half ago I was paying $1.99 per gallon. So you can talk till you are blue in the face. I'm not going to feel better about spending $110 to fill up my tundra.


https://www.energy.gov/eere/vehicles/fact-741-august-20-2012-historical-gasoline-prices-1929-2011

https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/

using these two sites, you can see that the price of gas, adjusted for inflation was 4.60 in 1982.
they were paying the equivalent of 4.39 in 2008....
just a little perspective
 

Budley Doright

Well-Known Member
Dude why is it that you libs always say I love my guns more than little kids? While at the same time you support abortion? You don't get how important the 2nd amendment is. Those who are ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it. There are literally dozens of examples of countries disarming their people and then within years... Rounding up and executing thousand s or millions of it's citizens. And everyone says well that would never happen here.... Well don't you think they said that in those countries too? Anyhow. My wife is from Brazil. Guns are illegal in Brazil. But guess what, her cousins husband still got his hands on a gun and shot her in the head. Taking away law abiding citizens guns doesn't take guns out of criminals hands. We have thousands of illegals coming across the southern border with drugs and all kinds of stuff. You gonna tell me nobody is bringing illegal guns across the border? If you can't pass a law that guarantees criminals don't have guns, then I'm not giving up my guns.
Who asked you to give up your guns? I must have missed that part :(.
 

Budley Doright

Well-Known Member
That's all well and good. But a year and a half ago I was paying $1.99 per gallon. So you can talk till you are blue in the face. I'm not going to feel better about spending $110 to fill up my tundra.
Ya it sucks and I told you, it’s Justin Trudeau’s fault ……. the bastard :cuss:
 

wil2279

Well-Known Member
Ya it sucks and I told you, it’s Justin Trudeau’s fault ……. the bastard :cuss:
I'm not a Justin Trudeau fan either. I'm not a fan of any politician that wants more government. I personally think the government is something that should work, and you shouldn't feel it in every part of your daily life... Kind of like plumbing. Lol. Besides work and growing... I shoot a lot. Mostly 22lr. But thanks to the government and all of their bullshit, it's been a long time since I could get my favorite ammos, and what I can get is 3 times the price I was paying under trump...
 

wil2279

Well-Known Member
Who asked you to give up your guns? I must have missed that part :(.
It was implied that my guns are more important to me than the lives of little children. I could turn in every gun I own, but it wouldn't save the life of anyone other than maybe a home intruder breaking into my house... Because I am not a criminal. Not 1 thing the democrats are suggesting would have stopped any of these school shootings.you know what would stop school shootings? 1 entrance to the school with a couple armed guards and an metal detector... I think it is retarded that we protect our politicians with highly trained guards and "military style" weapons. We protect armored trucks with lots of guns, we protect courthouses and all kinds of things with guns. But we protect our children with a sign that says no guns allowed. If these signs work so well maybe we should put a sign on the president's back that says don't shoot, instead of hiring secret service men...
 

Lucky Luke

Well-Known Member
It was implied that my guns are more important to me than the lives of little children. I could turn in every gun I own, but it wouldn't save the life of anyone other than maybe a home intruder breaking into my house... Because I am not a criminal. Not 1 thing the democrats are suggesting would have stopped any of these school shootings.you know what would stop school shootings? 1 entrance to the school with a couple armed guards and an metal detector... I think it is retarded that we protect our politicians with highly trained guards and "military style" weapons. We protect armored trucks with lots of guns, we protect courthouses and all kinds of things with guns. But we protect our children with a sign that says no guns allowed. If these signs work so well maybe we should put a sign on the president's back that says don't shoot, instead of hiring secret service men...
One door in and out is a fire hazard.
Don't forget to armor plate the windows...
Having children think they need armed guards creates a scared adult population.
There shouldn't be a need for a sign at a school saying no guns allowed.

You are aware that no other 1st world country has to have armed guards and metal detectors and fencers in place at schools?

Why is an embryo more important to you than a child?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top