There is a protest going on right now at my local chick fil a

Status
Not open for further replies.

guy incognito

Well-Known Member
LOL... typical.. insults over them debating him. OK... that is science. ahahahaha. My biggest one is one of the Laws of Biology... You can not get living matter from non living matter. That has always bugged me.
1. That has NOTHING to do with evolution. Evolution is a process that happens AFTER life is formed.
2. You have about as much proof as anyone of how abiogenesis happened.

I don't like to resort to insults, but the shit you are posting is literally retarded. It's a very accurate description of your posts. It bugs me that I don't know how we went from no life to life, but how does god explain anything at all? It appears to give an answer if you don't think about it. But what about god? Having life spring from no life without the intervention from god or an exact scientific explanation is unacceptable, but saying god did it, without explaining how we got to god from no god doesn't answer anything it just transfers it to an even more complicated question.
 

missnu

Well-Known Member
Actually, at CERN when antimatter exploration begun, many scientists proclaimed it as proving the book of genesis to be true.
Only in the movie did the Scientists at CERN think it proved the book of genesis...Dan Brown uses real places and real things to make fictional books...so by just reading the book you will only learn what things you need to research...reading the book, or watching the movie does not give you the info you seek...
I don't know about you, but I can't read CERNs website...it's all in French.
 

GanjaAL

Active Member
First you have to use the definition of what man is in according to the hebrew translation which does not discribe what you are saying. Anyways... this is turning way off point from the thread.
 

Kaendar

Well-Known Member
This is not in line with history texts. Where do you find these customized histories!? cn
Read! Read! Research! As an impressionable teenager, I lost all hope in the bible because I learned of Constantines actions. I bought hundreds of dollars of history books and researched all of this. Did you know Constantine finally converted to Christianity on his death bed?
 

Dr.J20

Well-Known Member
That is exactly what im saying.
I understand, that was the entire thrust of my post. it is interesting that that is what your saying because at one point the religious groups to which you cleave were on the opposite side of that issue. They would retort that your idea is a revisionist version of God's word and is heretical. you therefore are dangerous.
this is exactly what they are saying about homosexual marriage right now--it is dangerous and will cause God to become angry. I get that you're not on that side of the argument at this point, you've progressed towards saying its ok for "them" to marry just not act like themselves in public. Do you now see why i made the comment that your views on evolution are interesting? Its because it suggests you are willing to change your mind so long as the message is filtered through sources you already claim allegiance with. If some of your anti-jew conspiracy propaganda included positive messages about same sex marriage you would eventually espouse those beliefs.

it is thus, more succinctly, interesting because it exposes you as someone who just spouts off at the mouth. you don't really have any solid beliefs, per se, because you have a laundry list of talking points and cliches mixed with sketchy google-search resources. You're a follower at heart, but you have such a need to paint yourself as an individual that you have to contort yourself amazingly to offer a list of mutually exclusive "beliefs" in what can only be described as a paradoxical "code" or modus operandi.
 

srh88

Well-Known Member
Ya know, Im starting to think that you probably dont even have a job, considering the fact that you are on here every moment of the day. That equates to having no life...

Im getting ready to go to work.. peace.
this was 2 hours ago
 

Kaendar

Well-Known Member
Only in the movie did the Scientists at CERN think it proved the book of genesis...Dan Brown uses real places and real things to make fictional books...so by just reading the book you will only learn what things you need to research...reading the book, or watching the movie does not give you the info you seek...
I don't know about you, but I can't read CERNs website...it's all in French.
Movie? Are you quoting Dan Brown? The dude that gives entertainment but non truths?
 

missnu

Well-Known Member
1. That has NOTHING to do with evolution. Evolution is a process that happens AFTER life is formed.
2. You have about as much proof as anyone of how abiogenesis happened.

I don't like to resort to insults, but the shit you are posting is literally retarded. It's a very accurate description of your posts. It bugs me that I don't know how we went from no life to life, but how does god explain anything at all? It appears to give an answer if you don't think about it. But what about god? Having life spring from no life without the intervention from god or an exact scientific explanation is unacceptable, but saying god did it, without explaining how we got to god from no god doesn't answer anything it just transfers it to an even more complicated question.
Ganja Al is talking about spontaneous generation..which was disproved along long long time ago.
People used to think that if you put a bull in your barn with a rag and a certain type of hay that you could grow your own bees...all it took was one guy with some jars and some window screen to realize that the bees weren't growing from the bulls, they were just making nests in the hay...lol.
 

missnu

Well-Known Member
Movie? Are you quoting Dan Brown? The dude that gives entertainment but non truths?

Yes, those same truths you just gave...that is why I was telling you he uses real places, and real things, with made up stories.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Read! Read! Research! As an impressionable teenager, I lost all hope in the bible because I learned of Constantines actions. I bought hundreds of dollars of history books and researched all of this. Did you know Constantine finally converted to Christianity on his death bed?
That much is considered true, but your "theory" about Christians in revolt isn't. Christianity in Diocletian's and the early Constantine's Rome was not a political entity. cn
 

missnu

Well-Known Member
This has been the most amazing debate thread ever! We have talked about gays, and government, marriage, race, tattoos and now religion!. Will the wonders never cease...Oh well perhaps we can get all the weird arguing out of the way here.
 

Kaendar

Well-Known Member
I understand, that was the entire thrust of my post. it is interesting that that is what your saying because at one point the religious groups to which you cleave were on the opposite side of that issue. They would retort that your idea is a revisionist version of God's word and is heretical. you therefore are dangerous.
this is exactly what they are saying about homosexual marriage right now--it is dangerous and will cause God to become angry. I get that you're not on that side of the argument at this point, you've progressed towards saying its ok for "them" to marry just not act like themselves in public. Do you now see why i made the comment that your views on evolution are interesting? Its because it suggests you are willing to change your mind so long as the message is filtered through sources you already claim allegiance with. If some of your anti-jew conspiracy propaganda included positive messages about same sex marriage you would eventually espouse those beliefs.

it is thus, more succinctly, interesting because it exposes you as someone who just spouts off at the mouth. you don't really have any solid beliefs, per se, because you have a laundry list of talking points and cliches mixed with sketchy google-search resources. You're a follower at heart, but you have such a need to paint yourself as an individual that you have to contort yourself amazingly to offer a list of mutually exclusive "beliefs" in what can only be described as a paradoxical "code" or modus operandi.
I told everyone I wasnt a traditional Christian. Im also not some blind bible thumper.. I look at the bible, and I look at science, and see how they fit together.. my graphic on creation/evolution explains my way of thinking. Logical and scientific, but god was still responsible for putting the events in motion. The second half of you response was personal opinion, and incorrect.
 

missnu

Well-Known Member
Read! Read! Research! As an impressionable teenager, I lost all hope in the bible because I learned of Constantines actions. I bought hundreds of dollars of history books and researched all of this. Did you know Constantine finally converted to Christianity on his death bed?
yes...that isn't my point though...that isn't what I am saying...what I am saying is that it was world leaders and men like constantine that made up Christianity as you know it...
 

missnu

Well-Known Member
I understand, that was the entire thrust of my post. it is interesting that that is what your saying because at one point the religious groups to which you cleave were on the opposite side of that issue. They would retort that your idea is a revisionist version of God's word and is heretical. you therefore are dangerous.
this is exactly what they are saying about homosexual marriage right now--it is dangerous and will cause God to become angry. I get that you're not on that side of the argument at this point, you've progressed towards saying its ok for "them" to marry just not act like themselves in public. Do you now see why i made the comment that your views on evolution are interesting? Its because it suggests you are willing to change your mind so long as the message is filtered through sources you already claim allegiance with. If some of your anti-jew conspiracy propaganda included positive messages about same sex marriage you would eventually espouse those beliefs.

it is thus, more succinctly, interesting because it exposes you as someone who just spouts off at the mouth. you don't really have any solid beliefs, per se, because you have a laundry list of talking points and cliches mixed with sketchy google-search resources. You're a follower at heart, but you have such a need to paint yourself as an individual that you have to contort yourself amazingly to offer a list of mutually exclusive "beliefs" in what can only be described as a paradoxical "code" or modus operandi.
Perfect...or like someone who is picking the wrong answer to make sure people are paying them attention at all times.
 

guy incognito

Well-Known Member
Very nice Guy... so the truth comes out. Typical of intolerance.

Peace out!
Yes, saying "lol wut" in response to something you don't understand is intolerance. You don't even make sense. Seriously, do the world a favor, and go kill yourself you stupid fucking retard.
 

Kaendar

Well-Known Member
That much is considered true, but your "theory" about Christians in revolt isn't. Christianity in Diocletian's and the early Constantine's Rome was not a political entity. cn
Ok, my wording was wrong. It wasnt of a revolt of Christianity, it was actually closer to a civil war between pagans and Christians..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top