(CBRN) Chemical, Biological, Radiological & Nuclear

Private Shaggy, is that a jelly donut?

And at that place they would always threaten people with Jamaica. Because it was like this network of programs where they tried to program you. And they could send you there to Jamaica past your 18th Birthday, so some people were at a place in Jamaica until they were 21 and they could beat you there. Like TYC kind of, but at the end they give you your passport back, because you have to get a passport to get sent there since its another country.

People ran away all the time. And it was in the middle of Louisiana in the country where a bunch of like gang members and their extended family members raising horses and stuff. And the closest city was Alexandria, and no one had like a map of the area or anything in there. No one was from there either.

pabloesqobar said:

Whoa, hey, easy Disco.

1. I have no opinion about what you claim to be your religion.
2. You seem more upset with me than with posters who have posted very vile stuff about you and your family. Look into that.
3. The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act provides many protections. For various things like evictions, judgments, etc. And in civil proceedings if you are a DEFENDANT. And even then it's up to the discretion of the Judge. You are the Plaintiff.

Read some of those links I posted.

You're welcome.

Click to expand...

I read about it, and the Service Members Civil Relief Act can be applied either way. It's basically just a law that says a person in charge of you has to write to a judge in various situations, saying that you are unable to appear. So it applies to Plaintiffs too.

Finshaggy said:

I read about it, and the Service Members Civil Relief Act can be applied either way. It's basically just a law that says a person in charge of you has to write to a judge in various situations, saying that you are unable to appear. So it applies to Plaintiffs too.

Click to expand...

Christ, it's in black and white within the 4 corners of the document. Please quote the section that allows the relief you are contemplating as a Plaintiff.

http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/bankruptcy/bankruptcy-basics/servicemembers-civil-relief-act-scra

See any relief in there for Plaintiffs?

pabloesqobar said:

Christ, it's in black and white within the 4 corners of the document. Please quote the section that allows the relief you are contemplating as a Plaintiff.

Click to expand...

It's not 4 Corners of a Document. It's a few Sections in the Law.

Here is the Original Act, from 1918
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/pagedetails.action?collectionCode=USCODE&browsePath=Title+50/Title+50/-1006&granuleId=USCODE-2011-title50-app-soldiersa&packageId=USCODE-2011-title50&collapse=true&fromBrowse=true

Here is the new Act. Specifically the parts about legal relief, not like cell phone contracts and leases and stuff.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-50/subchapter-I
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-50/subchapter-II
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-50/subchapter-VII

Here is the exact part you are saying doesn't exist
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/3932
(a) Applicability of section
This section applies to any civil action or proceeding, including any child custody proceeding, in which the plaintiff or defendant at the time of filing an application under this section—
(1)
is in military service or is within 90 days after termination of or release from military service; and
(2)
has received notice of the action or proceeding.

And the only way that can be changed by the Military is if they take it to court and the Supreme Court says that something about that law is Unconstitutional.

Finshaggy said:

It's not 4 Corners of a Document. It's a few Sections in the Law.

Here is the Original Act, from 1918
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/pagedetails.action?collectionCode=USCODE&browsePath=Title+50/Title+50/-1006&granuleId=USCODE-2011-title50-app-soldiersa&packageId=USCODE-2011-title50&collapse=true&fromBrowse=true

Here is the new Act. Specifically the parts about legal relief, not like cell phone contracts and leases and stuff.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-50/subchapter-I
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-50/subchapter-II
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-50/subchapter-VII

Here is the exact part you are saying doesn't exist
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/3932
(a) Applicability of section
This section applies to any civil action or proceeding, including any child custody proceeding, in which the plaintiff or defendant at the time of filing an application under this section—
(1)
is in military service or is within 90 days after termination of or release from military service; and
(2)
has received notice of the action or proceeding.

Click to expand...

I think you're right. It appears I was wrong. Have you started the discovery process in your case?

https://deomi.org/DiversityMgmt/RelAccomMilitary.cfm
http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/Reading_Room/Personnel_Related/799.pdf

pabloesqobar said:

I think you're right. It appears I was wrong. Have you started the discovery process in your case?

Click to expand...

No, the city asked that it be removed to Federal court, so it's taking forever. Hasn't even really started yet, we're still just in the filing stuff to the court phase. They could probably motion for discovery though. But I don't think they want to talk to me, I emailed their lawyer a bunch of stuff and she's like scared to reply. I basically laid out, in the words of the law, how she is going to lose.

I even suggested some starting points for research on their position they decided to take in the response, and then explained, in the words of the law, how they are wrong on the entire premise.

Lol...no offense dude, I seriously doubt she is sweating your lawsuit..I'd be interested in reading that email ya sent to her though..care to post it?

Corso312 said:

Lol...no offense dude, I seriously doubt she is sweating your lawsuit..I'd be interested in reading that email ya sent to her though..care to post it?

Click to expand...

It's a few emails, it would take a while. And I literally point by point explained how both the laws of Texas and the Federal Laws, and both Constitutions, say that their position is wrong. I'm.not saying she is sweating, she is probably just moving on to easier cases. But she is afraid to reply or she would reply. Usually the lawyer talks to the other side's lawyer.

Same thing happened with the Narcotics Sergeant, but instead of not replying he started helping me, because he realized their department had messed up according to the law.

And I'm pretty sure the officer keeps telling everyone "I did everything by the books" so when I show people that "by the books" means making way and accommodating religion, they are like "damn".

Finshaggy said:

No, the city asked that it be removed to Federal court, so it's taking forever. Hasn't even really started yet, we're still just in the filing stuff to the court phase. They could probably motion for discovery though. But I don't think they want to talk to me, I emailed their lawyer a bunch of stuff and she's like scared to reply. I basically laid out, in the words of the law, how she is going to lose.

Click to expand...

I'm no legal expert. But can you propound written discovery right now? That is statutory, not at the convenience/motion of the Defendant. Look at the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Wouldn't surprise me if you can start discovery against the Defendant.

If so, make them spend some money. Propound a ton of written interrogatories, request they produce documents, request that they admit x, y and z. All under oath.

Prove your case if you're serious about it.

pabloesqobar said:

I'm no legal expert. But can you propound written discovery right now? That is statutory, not at the convenience/motion of the Defendant. Look at the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Wouldn't surprise me if you can start discovery against the Defendant.

If so, make them spend some money. Propound a ton of written interrogatories, request they produce documents, request that they admit x, y and z. All under oath.

Prove your case if you're serious about it.

Click to expand...

They don't have anything. And I already know the most extensive defense they could have. They could go to the Police Monitor, and for some reason the Police Monitors here say they only care about the Code of Conduct, no case law or Constitution or Legislated Law, only the Police Code of Conduct. And they have cameras, but they don't have to use them and they already told me he had no camera. So he could bring them on and have them say that he didn't do anything that wasn't by the book.

But that still doesn't answer the Civil violations in Texas Code Title 5 Chapter 110, or the Texas Bill of Rights (article 6 I think is Religious Freedom) or USC Title 42 Chapters 21B and 21C, or the Free Exercise Clause of the Constitution.
And my problem wasn't with his conduct, it is with the fact that he took Religious materials simply because they did not show up as drugs in a drug kit. Not for any other reason. He thought they looked like drugs, they didn't show up as any drug, so he took all of it. No charges were filed against me, they just took a bunch of Religious stuff with no warrant or anything. Then kept for over 4 Months.

And they had me cuffed in the back of a cop car for an hour while they went through my car.

And I can Subphena the Narcotics Conspiracy Sergeant, and I will win the case. I just have to bring copies of our emails.

Ok.