Conservative Senator Carnighan To Table Drugged Driving Bill

JungleStrikeGuy

Well-Known Member
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/carignan-legislation-marijuana-impaired-driving-1.3786651

Get ready for this circus.

The problem is major at present and will become catastrophic if marijuana is legalized," he said during a news conference today.

Andrew Murie, chief executive officer of MADD Canada, said road safety must be paramount as part of that plan.


He urged the government not to legalize marijuana before police have the proper tools and training in place, and before the public is sufficiently educated about the dangers of being stoned behind the wheel.


"In the ideal world, the drug-impaired legislation would come first and then Health Canada would spend a year educating Canadians, especially parents, on the risk of cannabis use, closing the illegal dispensaries followed by the start of legal recreational marijuana sales through a public health model," he said.
 

JungleStrikeGuy

Well-Known Member
thing is thc stays in the system like up to 6 wks sometimes after you have had any ..gee this is gonna be fair
Yep, a case in Saskatchewan was thrown out because even though a woman was proven to have THC in her blood they couldn't prove impairment.

I have no idea why MADD is obsessed with treating a substance they know isn't alcohol to be treated like alcohol, but they seem set on passing draconian laws that are likely to be challenged (successfully) in court. MADD's excuse for this is 'well the cops that are trained to detect impairment are expensive to train'. So?

Phelan (or a past MMJ ruling) stated that 'training / inspections cost money' isn't an excuse for the government.
 

torontoke

Well-Known Member
I'd like him to back up his statement why it will become "catastrophic" once legalized.
I found the use of this particular word most alarming.
It's a terribly slippery slope for the gov or hc to use this word because in the medical world someone who is deemed "catastrophic" is someone unable to work ever again.
And someone taking 8-10 perks a day plus 4-5grams of mj following their guidelines of not driving for 3-4 hours after use would make a lot of folks "catastrophic."
Get ready for a few billion more in disability and pension spending.
 

cannadan

Well-Known Member
the old stigma ...just won't go away....well for at least another 20 years...
this is terrible for them to think this way
there are too many anti's in positions of power....
we need to remove them from power....in every case...
enough is enough....don't vote for these people.
 

The Hippy

Well-Known Member
Yep, a case in Saskatchewan was thrown out because even though a woman was proven to have THC in her blood they couldn't prove impairment.

I have no idea why MADD is obsessed with treating a substance they know isn't alcohol to be treated like alcohol, but they seem set on passing draconian laws that are likely to be challenged (successfully) in court. MADD's excuse for this is 'well the cops that are trained to detect impairment are expensive to train'. So?

Phelan (or a past MMJ ruling) stated that 'training / inspections cost money' isn't an excuse for the government.
Madd is the most disgusting bunch of lying tea toddling alcohol prohibitionists we have. They pay themselves huge salaries to simply state lies and exaggeration. It nothing more than a propped up business. This is their latest campaign to keep the gravy flowing. They make their living off of fear and lies. All the while pretending to be doing something.
Fuck they make me puke. And I hope they all get what they deserve someday as well.
 

GrowRock

Well-Known Member
Madd is the most disgusting bunch of lying tea toddling alcohol prohibitionists we have. They pay themselves huge salaries to simply state lies and exaggeration. It nothing more than a propped up business. This is their latest campaign to keep the gravy flowing. They make their living off of fear and lies. All the while pretending to be doing something.
Fuck they make me puke. And I hope they all get what they deserve someday as well.
I agree 1000% madd should stick to alcohol because if the drunk drivers who killed there love ones would have picked up a bong instead of a bottle...... There love ones would likely still be alive..... So fuck off madd and go back to alchol protests
 

jafro daweedhound

Well-Known Member
why it will become "catastrophic"
because he said so....what other evidence could be needed ???

I have no idea why MADD is obsessed with treating a substance they know isn't alcohol
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ is why....
organizations like madd need to create fear amongst the non-educated masses in order to receive donations. Murie will make a six figure income which he wants increased.....

"In the ideal world, the drug-impaired legislation would come first and then Health Canada would spend a year educating Canadians
Yes lets put everyone in stadiums and make them watch REEFER MADNESS until they are educated. with special appearances by uncle bill the narc!!


He urged the government not to legalize marijuana before police have the proper tools and training in place
He said the situation will become more grave when marijuana is legalized, yet the government does not have a strategy.

So 100years of prohibition wasn't enough time to teach the cops anything.
 

CarpeNocturnum

Well-Known Member
I am a victim of drug impaired driving and the laws in sask made it so we couldn't get a drug impaired conviction since there were no guidelines and not enough legal restriction.
Impaired cannabis convictions are still very hard to hold up in court.
The pos guy who nearly killed me and my. mother has coke e and meth in his system and since the possibility of an impaired driving conviction is difficult to have since there are no set standards for drug levels in the blood.
So he got a deal for two counts of dangerous driving causing injury.
 
Last edited:

GrowRock

Well-Known Member
I am the victim of drug impaired driving and the laws in sask made it so we couldn't get a drug impaired conviction since there were no guidelines and not enough legal restriction.
Impaired cannabis convictions are still very hard to hold up in court.
The pos guy who nearly killed me and my. mother has coke e and meth in his system and since the possibility of an impaired driving conviction is difficult to have since there are no set standards for drug levels in the blood.
So he got a deal for two counts of dangerous driving causing injury.
That's terrible hope all is well. I agree they should be looking into oxy coke mdma etc driving but leave cannabis alone. I have drove on cannabis since 16 with no prob I am now double that. Just my 2 cents if the gov actually gave a shit about drugged driving they would already have a test in place for coke heroin etc they don't and reffer madness goes on
 

Bigger

Active Member
MADD's analysis of national statistics found 614 road fatalities in 2012 involved drivers with drugs in their system, compared with 476 fatalities where drivers had alcohol in their system.

Yet the rate of charges for driving under the influence of drugs remains very low compared to alcohol-related charges.



That was my favorite line of bullshit. Nice and vague with the wording.
I'm sure middle aged soccer mom, high on oxys, didn't get charged. Or any other of the thousands of 'drugs'.
 

WHATFG

Well-Known Member
Impairment due to cannabis is going to be hard to prove....people become mellow, they eat, they laugh, they go to sleep....people are allowed to use their discretion to drive with all the goodies big pharma can provide.
 
Top