Cops taze a man for filming cops breaking the law

VictorVIcious

Well-Known Member
Wow....that is very interesting. Really though if police have probable cause they can search.

Let's use this scenario....a family member or close friend is murdered. The police have a suspect and many people have implicated them in the happenings. They said they know for sure and he or she was bragging about the occurrence. The police know that the suspect is hiding in somebody's house. They go there to question him or her without a search warrant. Then they see him or her in the background with a gun in their pants. Would you find it objectionable for those police to bust into that house without a search warrant to arrest the person they know killed your loved one? Well see when the tables are turned we want another plate to pick from.
I would expect the pigs to use their heads, it is really simple. Return to the public property, call in back up to watch anyone leaving the back, call the power company's and have all of the services to the house turned off. Right after you do this use a bullhorn to announce your intention to sit and wait for the suspect to come out of the house. When he gets hungry, cold or tired it will end. Blaming violence on a need for immediate action is pure bullshit. :cuss:VV
 

delstele

Well-Known Member
I would expect the pigs to use their heads, it is really simple. Return to the public property, call in back up to watch anyone leaving the back, call the power company's and have all of the services to the house turned off. Right after you do this use a bullhorn to announce your intention to sit and wait for the suspect to come out of the house. When he gets hungry, cold or tired it will end. Blaming violence on a need for immediate action is pure bullshit. :cuss:VV
:clap::clap:
 

Boneman

Well-Known Member
abuse of authority. I wish I could carry a taser and zap a pig. I would say that he had a gun and I was in fear for my life. LOL
 

misshestermoffitt

New Member
I hope the dude that got tazed wins the law suit. Maybe he was an innocent Ireporter for CNN. Tazing someone for video taping is a blatent abuse of power.

Part of his lawsuit should be that he gets to taze that bitch back !
 
K

Keenly

Guest
In the war of liberty vs tyranny, the camera is the new gun, and they are VERY afraid of it...


Supreme court has ruled several times cops are not legally obligated to protect you from harm...

so what


the fuck


are they there for
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
Old thread, but what the heck....
In the war of liberty vs tyranny, the camera is the new gun, and they are VERY afraid of it...


Supreme court has ruled several times cops are not legally obligated to protect you from harm...

so what


the fuck


are they there for
Police is a noun and a transitive verb.

The Police are there to police us. One definition of police is: to control.

The Police are there to control us.
 

ilkhan

Well-Known Member
Anyone notice how the more laws we have, the more laws we need?
We outlaw drugs, we need many more cops, cops get scared, we outlaw filming cops.
If I was a cop,
I would want my shit filmed.
To prove I did everything right.
If your scared of a camara your doin' something wrong.
Just that simple.
 

RickWhite

Well-Known Member
In MI, it is a FELONY simply to resist or even disobey a police officer. That is right, a FELONY. It is also a felony to defend your self against a police officer. So if attacked and you try to break free of the attack you are committing a felony - you must stand there and allow your self to be beaten. And most of the time it doesn't matter what the cops actions were because you will not win in court. So essentially, MI is a full blown police state.

I think there should be a law that if a cop commits a crime, he receives three times the normal punishment. So for an assault that would normally get you 90 days the cop would get 270.
 
Top