Samwell Seed Well
Well-Known Member
its not a debate its obvious that statement contradicts itself
lol
you cant even answer a yes or no question, based on your own opinion, well . . let me know when Mitt, or Ryan tell you what to think
debate #1
- Thread starter UncleBuck
- Start date
its not a debate its obvious that statement contradicts itself
lol
you cant even answer a yes or no question, based on your own opinion, well . . let me know when Mitt, or Ryan tell you what to think
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
Ok, fair enough. Check back with us on November 7th.
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
You complained he didnt give details. I quoted lines from the debate that showed he did give details.
Rather than acknowledging that point you simply hopped over to the fact that the details were contradictory.
I dont need to win your vote for office. If you are not going to have an honest discussion here I am not going to jump down the rabbit holes you choose to create.
Samwell Seed Well
Well-Known Member
not sure how Ryan or Mitt is gonna talk about their contradictory statements but, im sure if we all try to forget it will get swept under the rug
im not complaining, im asking quetions, and making statements
its contradictory, says he wants states to shoulder teh responsibility for making schools better then hes gonna give government vouchers to familys so they can go where ever . . . . seems contradictory . . idk . .im sure there is more to it then just those base statements, but as he left it at that . .hes contradicting himself
im not complaining, im asking quetions, and making statements
its contradictory, says he wants states to shoulder teh responsibility for making schools better then hes gonna give government vouchers to familys so they can go where ever . . . . seems contradictory . . idk . .im sure there is more to it then just those base statements, but as he left it at that . .hes contradicting himself
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
I am sure that Biden will do a great job pointing them out in his debate with Ryan...
(or not)
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
Apparently, you haven't seen our shiny, new abacus. Hold on a sec, I'll go grab it.
Samwell Seed Well
Well-Known Member
its gonna be a fun debate i think, no matter the outcome
no i saw your post about the abacuse . . i know you dont knwo what to say till its been backed by the party so there is no point in gettign into "what do you think": questions as you havent been told what to think yet , soon though
all in all its gonna be a good debates . . .hope biden doesnt do something old like piss himself
Samwell Seed Well
Well-Known Member
(haha you deleted your post . . .post fail . . reading fail . . .just fail all around NLXS .. you need to get some sleep old man)
no you think im talking to you,
im talking to MuyC, right there as a response to him mentioning the abacuse
do you know how to read
no you think im talking to you,
im talking to MuyC, right there as a response to him mentioning the abacuse
do you know how to read
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
I deleted the post.
Yes, I can read.
But when an idiot quotes me and then responds to me and suddenly responds to someone else in the same post it tends to be confusing for everyone.
Samwell Seed Well
Well-Known Member
everything is not about you dude
figure it out
figure it out
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
Typical liberal... You want me to make up for your shortcomings.
Antidisestablishmentarian
Well-Known Member
If its not about him, then maybe you shouldn't quote him.
Samwell Seed Well
Well-Known Member
lol my short comings . . .guy blow and Tweedledum dont have any comprehension skills and apparently its my fault . . .oh stupid people always needing every thing done for them
kelly4
Well-Known Member
Someone get a stretcher.....we got a case of butthurt here.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Don't give your dog too much peanut butter.
I was really butt hurt when Dubya stole it in 04. He didn't win, but somehow he stayed in office. Mitt is his carbon copy. I guess it won't be obvious until we realize there are no nukes in Iran but he signs a status of forces agreement anyway. Or we could get lucky and have anyone else for president that isn't GOP.
Doer
Well-Known Member
The economy grows by itself. Or is suppose to. WE KEEP ADDING PEOPLE. Wealth comes from opportunity. A business is created to share wealth among employees and shareholders and the consumer. That the main job, Barry signed up for. Get it going, not make excuses. What does Obama rely on but lies and hopes the lies with repeat thru the vein of stupidity in this country?
He has failed. Failed in the Economy. Failed in the War with Iran. Blew out the careful blocking actions in Iraq and Afgan, and lost valuable State secrets. No President has had a US Ambassador tortured for information on his watch. Everyone thinks we are not just a paper Tiger, just worthless paper. Weakness is killed in nature. Many of the pussies here think that is only right, to stick it to Capitalism and let Sharia-fascism have it's way.
The forces are gathering to kill us individually and in mass, if they can. Or is that another dupe?
It the world would only like us? If we could apologize and appease enough? But that has already been tried.
We almost lost WW2.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Yeah buck, just give the rich people the money, they will hire people.
canndo
Well-Known Member
What came over the tube to me was an overamped pekingeese yapping at an intentionaly patient man "He got to start last time... I want to finish.....but.. but"
However, I notice that others don't see it the way I did and of course I am biased against Romney if not for Obama. I was stupified that Obama didn't shoot out Romney's lights with 47 percent if nothing else. I want to believe that the Prez wanted to seem unflappable and presidential.
It didn't work. He could have slapped Romney down at almost any time if he had had the presence of mind to do so and yet he did not.
I am forced to agree with even the leftists pundents who say that Romney won.
Look, however, at the bigger picture (if you can)
THe "in the tank for Obama, the ever biased MSM" are somewhat mysteriously taking a break from that bias and hardly spinning a win or even a draw for Obama. Gee, what happened?
And the polls, those awful polls that were previously skewed for Obama have, again, mysteriously, adjusted themselves and are showing favorability toward Romney's performance last night.
Perhaps in their excitement the right is ignoring this bit of evidence that they are still not firmly rooted in reality.
However, I notice that others don't see it the way I did and of course I am biased against Romney if not for Obama. I was stupified that Obama didn't shoot out Romney's lights with 47 percent if nothing else. I want to believe that the Prez wanted to seem unflappable and presidential.
It didn't work. He could have slapped Romney down at almost any time if he had had the presence of mind to do so and yet he did not.
I am forced to agree with even the leftists pundents who say that Romney won.
Look, however, at the bigger picture (if you can)
THe "in the tank for Obama, the ever biased MSM" are somewhat mysteriously taking a break from that bias and hardly spinning a win or even a draw for Obama. Gee, what happened?
And the polls, those awful polls that were previously skewed for Obama have, again, mysteriously, adjusted themselves and are showing favorability toward Romney's performance last night.
Perhaps in their excitement the right is ignoring this bit of evidence that they are still not firmly rooted in reality.
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
And here we are treated to some insight in to the mind of a liberal.
Note how allowing private citizens to keep money they legally earned is actually described as "giving" them money. I guess everything belongs to the government or the "collective" and any scraps they throw your way should be appreciated. What's it like to have beliefs that are diametrically opposed to everything this country stands for and every core value it was founded on?
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
Yeah, they were the pillars of neutrality. From their obvious dejected and disappointed demeanors all the way to actually saying Obama should watch their shows if he wanted to know how to beat Romney. No blatant bias there, right? They are fucking outright saying how sick they are over the outcome.
So, to your line of thought, since the rout was so complete that even they couldn't lie like they normally do and spin it into a win for Obama, somehow that shows the bias thing is fictitious? Good luck with that.