KillerIndica
Well-Known Member
Comrade CentristScum.
Democratic Voters Are Done with Party Centrists—and the Progressives Are a Majority
- Thread starter KillerIndica
- Start date
KillerIndica
Well-Known Member
Good sig line.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
So, how many do you want to murder, kkkomrade? Every Democrat who didn't vote for Sanders? That would be most of the black and Hispanic voters in this country. The alt.right will furnish you with the death camps. I'm sure they could be built with excess material from Trump's wall. White identity politics are hot right now. I bet you could get some donations from including the Trumps.
KillerIndica
Well-Known Member
We can start with all repukes and go from there.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
It's going to be huge. Where are you going to build the death camps, Joseph?
dagwood45431
Well-Known Member
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Now you have me and Buck mixed up; I'm not claiming 'my way or the highway', my claim is 'after 40 years of an increasingly ineffectual and unresponsive Democratic Party, it's high time to try something different'.
There is a difference and it might be enlightening for you to ponder on it for awhile.
Last edited:
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
no, your inflexible demands are authoritarian in nature. I gave plenty of examples of your demands on others to establish my point that you are authoritarian. Read my post. It contains examples. Refute them, don't just say nuh uh.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Start at 3:00 and Mr Obama will tell you himself by 3:30.
And it's 'ignorant about this', genius.
Rest assured, I'm not going anywhere. Someone has to provide a counterpoint to the great unwashed, uneducated and grammatically challenged.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
cool youtube video.
youtube videos with exclamative captions are the best source of information.
travisw
Well-Known Member
So you have so little appreciation for the nuances of speech, you think that after years of being accused of being a socialist,by Republicans, him saying 30 years ago his policies would have been considered Republican, is him actually saying he's Republican?
This has got to be a troll, nobody is that fucking stupid.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
I know, you can't handle that kind of high tech.
If you could, you'd see Mr Obama saying it himself.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
If you think it's just semantics, have a look at his record:
So you have so little appreciation for the nuances of speech, you think that after years of being accused of being a socialist,by Republicans, him saying 30 years ago his policies would have been considered Republican, is him actually saying he's Republican?
This has got to be a troll, nobody is that fucking stupid.
Labor Unions? No help.
Homeowners? On the street.
Banksters? Record profits.
Income inequality? Worse.
Wars? Up! From 2 to 7.
Defense spending? Also Up.
Drone strikes? Ohh yeah...
But hey- he did stick up for gays in the military!
Last edited:
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
It's hardly surprising that Bernie cucks keep ignoring the Republicans and attacking Democrats.
Especially Obama, your little group of racists can't help but attack the black man who did a tremendous job with the cards he was dealt.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
I don't see anyone defending Republicans. No one seems to think they're worth defending.
I just see you poor benighted souls continually defending Democrats as if they're much better or indeed very different.
This is how your beloved Savior, Barack Obama, is seen by the outside world, in this case British journalists;
The US Presidential Election 2012
This is a US election that defies logic and brings the nation closer towards a one-party state masquerading as a two-party state.
The Democratic incumbent has surrounded himself with conservative advisors and key figures — many from previous administrations, and an unprecedented number from the Trilateral Commission. He also appointed a former Monsanto executive as Senior Advisor to the FDA. He has extended Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, presided over a spiralling rich-poor gap and sacrificed further American jobs with recent free trade deals. Trade union rights have also eroded under his watch. He has expanded Bush defence spending, droned civilians, failed to close Guantanamo, supported the NDAA which effectively legalises martial law, allowed drilling and adopted a soft-touch position towards the banks that is to the right of European Conservative leaders. Taking office during the financial meltdown, Obama appointed its principal architects to top economic positions. We list these because many of Obama's detractors absurdly portray him as either a radical liberal or a socialist, while his apologists, equally absurdly, continue to view him as a well-intentioned progressive, tragically thwarted by overwhelming pressures. 2008's yes-we-can chanters, dazzled by pigment rather than policy detail, forgot to ask can what? Between 1998 and the last election, Obama amassed $37.6million from the financial services industry, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. While 2008 presidential candidate Obama appeared to champion universal health care, his first choice for Secretary of Health was a man who had spent years lobbying on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry against that very concept. Hey! You don't promise a successful pub, and then appoint the Salvation Army to run it. This time around, the honey-tongued President makes populist references to economic justice, while simultaneously appointing as his new Chief of Staff a former Citigroup executive concerned with hedge funds that bet on the housing market to collapse. Obama poses something of a challenge to The Political Compass, because he's a man of so few fixed principles.
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
If you honestly think politics is simplistic enough to be divided into Cartesian grid then you're even less intelligent that Id contemplated before (and the bar was pretty low).I don't see anyone defending Republicans. No one seems to think they're worth defending.
I just see you poor benighted souls continually defending Democrats as if they're much better or indeed very different.
This is how your beloved Savior, Barack Obama, is seen by the outside world, in this case British journalists;
The US Presidential Election 2012
This is a US election that defies logic and brings the nation closer towards a one-party state masquerading as a two-party state.
The Democratic incumbent has surrounded himself with conservative advisors and key figures — many from previous administrations, and an unprecedented number from the Trilateral Commission. He also appointed a former Monsanto executive as Senior Advisor to the FDA. He has extended Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, presided over a spiralling rich-poor gap and sacrificed further American jobs with recent free trade deals. Trade union rights have also eroded under his watch. He has expanded Bush defence spending, droned civilians, failed to close Guantanamo, supported the NDAA which effectively legalises martial law, allowed drilling and adopted a soft-touch position towards the banks that is to the right of European Conservative leaders. Taking office during the financial meltdown, Obama appointed its principal architects to top economic positions. We list these because many of Obama's detractors absurdly portray him as either a radical liberal or a socialist, while his apologists, equally absurdly, continue to view him as a well-intentioned progressive, tragically thwarted by overwhelming pressures. 2008's yes-we-can chanters, dazzled by pigment rather than policy detail, forgot to ask can what? Between 1998 and the last election, Obama amassed $37.6million from the financial services industry, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. While 2008 presidential candidate Obama appeared to champion universal health care, his first choice for Secretary of Health was a man who had spent years lobbying on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry against that very concept. Hey! You don't promise a successful pub, and then appoint the Salvation Army to run it. This time around, the honey-tongued President makes populist references to economic justice, while simultaneously appointing as his new Chief of Staff a former Citigroup executive concerned with hedge funds that bet on the housing market to collapse. Obama poses something of a challenge to The Political Compass, because he's a man of so few fixed principles.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
As with any model, it both simplifies and illuminates.
You complain but as ever you have no specific grievances.
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
Eh your grid is oversimplified and retarded?
I know, I should use simpler words with you.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Vote for another 'Democrat' who expands the military budget, ignores Unions, helps banks and puts a pharmaceutical executive in charge of health care and see where that gets you.
You've utterly failed to address why supporting the same party will lead to different results. That's because you know your answers have no credibility.
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
And you getting Trump elected is totally helping the country.
When you gonna fuck off and renounce your Democrat registration and sign up to the new party to Nader the left and give Trump another win?