The Hippy
Well-Known Member
He sure is.....wrote him off as a no mind fool.
Do Designated Growers Need To Be ACMPR Patients
- Thread starter n3fta
- Start date
you show up here out of the blue..
start yappin BS left right and center
and call out people at the site?
hahahahahahahahahhaha
The Hippy
Well-Known Member
He hurt my wittle feelings.....lol
you show up here out of the blue..
start yappin BS left right and center
and call out people at the site?
hahahahahahahahahhaha
you know about the bunny farm ?
n3fta
Well-Known Member
I've been on vacation and just got back to this thread. What a fucking shit show. Are there no mods here?
Hippy and GB (maybe the same person?) make this board unbearable. I can't even understand what they're saying half the time. I asked a simple question and it turned into a 3 pages of Hippy and GB doing whatever it is they're doing here. These are the exact trolls that I didn't want advice from, neither should anyone else tbh.
Thanks to those who tried to give a legitimate reply.
Hippy and GB (maybe the same person?) make this board unbearable. I can't even understand what they're saying half the time. I asked a simple question and it turned into a 3 pages of Hippy and GB doing whatever it is they're doing here. These are the exact trolls that I didn't want advice from, neither should anyone else tbh.
Thanks to those who tried to give a legitimate reply.
chex1111
Well-Known Member
Is it always the DG who gets charged if theres an offense with the patient's DG grow? I would assume it would be, since the patient may, (having a criminal record) not be able to see his Designated grow. The DG can just grow and keep whatever he wants unbeknownst to the patient. I know there are many DG licenses where the patient thinks the grow has been shut down, yet the DG is still growing, way over their count and keeping everything.
What is the mechanism to shut down an old DG grow anyways? The cops can't get a warrant to check, the license is still covered by the injunction?
The Hippy
Well-Known Member
Do you need to be told twice. Actually just re-read it...Nothing changed about you.
spider9
Well-Known Member
What I was told by Health Canada that you send them a registered letter firing your DG and send them your pinks and the copy of the DG's pinks. but this also shuts down your personal possession lic. so then you have to reapply all over again total crap but that is how they do things in Ottawa me I will never give up my pinks.
n3fta
Well-Known Member
Read what? Your comment saying nobody likes me here?
The Hippy
Well-Known Member
Brewery
Well-Known Member
I don't know about the old mmar dgs, but the acmpr looks pretty clear - file an amendment changing the dg/ switching to personal production, or cancelling the grow altogether. HC is to notify the former dg. This is under part 2, 180(3) of the acmpr regulations.
the comments that comment about your trolling out of no where..
grow up .
let it go
move on
take TM with you ...
cheers big ears!
n3fta
Well-Known Member
Your right, I don't get it, just like I don't most of the trash you post around here. I'm done with you dude, it's just not worth the time.I know...you won't get this either. ...not that I care.
n3fta
Well-Known Member
I'm the troll? I asked a fucking question. Good god man, look in the mirror.the comments that comment about your trolling out of no where..
grow up .
let it go
move on
take TM with you ...
cheers big ears!
you still here?