Donations pour in from liberals to help Obamacare-hating conservative

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Why the fuck would any sane individual do so? The only time there's a problem with it, is when spending isn't reduced. Cut taxes, slash the budget in half...VIOLÁ!

Keynesians, lol.
obama already cut the budget more than in half you dipshit.

have you ever made one single factually correct statement ever?
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Supply side economics transfers the wealth from the middle/lower class to the upper class

If you're against "the transfer of wealth" as you so claim, you would be against supply side economics

I mean, if you were intellectually honest..
Cos the poor get nothing in exchange for their money, all those iPhones they have are a result of the evil capitalists, not the fact their shit at handling money.

"Oh look, a new phone that does everything my current one does but it's got a bigger number at the end!!! Must have!!"
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
if we wanted to follow what the laffer curve had to say, top marginal rates would be at about 70% instead of the 39.6% they currently sit at.
You completely misunderstand the laffer curve.

NOWHERE does the laffer curve point to a nominal rate. It is a HYPOTHETICAL theory.



PS. What an actual Laffer curve looks like:
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You completely misunderstand the laffer curve.

NOWHERE does the laffer curve point to a nominal rate. It is a HYPOTHETICAL theory.



PS. What an actual Laffer curve looks like:
yeah, no way you can map out actual revenues under actual tax rates and come up with a curve that shows where the optimal point is for maximum revenues.

dumbass.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
you're right, i should not have mirrored his language.

obama has slashed the deficit more than in half, more than any other president in history in fact.
Good, also corpsman isn't pronounced like Corpseman it's Coreman. Just in case you wanted to mirror other language of his.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
upload_2015-5-17_1-38-13.png

Utah, Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, Idaho, Tennessee and Arkansas are some of the most religious states in the nation.

Church counts towards charitable donations. Donating to your church hardly does anything for the good of the state or the general public around them. Furthermore, that listed states, besides Utah, are some of the poorest and lowest per capita income earning states in the nation. 2.8% of discretionary income of an average of $51k a year compared to 7.1% of an average of $28k a year is "mo' money". And Utah; that's the Moron state, oops, I mean Mormon state. Of course that would be the case, Mormons help Mormons and its a tax right off. Going against the whole idea of "Separation of Church and State", huh?
 

see4

Well-Known Member
Supply side economics transfers the wealth from the middle/lower class to the upper class

If you're against "the transfer of wealth" as you so claim, you would be against supply side economics

I mean, if you were intellectually honest..
One of the best comments of the night.


I gave that award out earlier to someone else tonight too.

Keep up the good work!
 
Top