Down with the Deep State!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Skybound420

Skybound420

Well-Known Member
This is a touchy topic that impacts every American. Unfortunately for NeverTrump folks, the deep state was also on their side and doing their level best to prevent Trump from getting elected, and after they failed at that, every last one of them became exposed to investigation and criminal prosecution. Facing eminent doom for all of their many crimes and all of the careers that will be ruined trying to ensure that ONLY Hillary could be elected, the deep state had to dig in their heals and double down by framing Trump for colluding with Putin and his evil Russians to prevent Hillary from claiming her birthright. Lucky for the republic, the FBI is only awesome at solving crimes, but when it comes to actually committing some crimes, they are about as unorganized as they come. How is it that Peter Strzok was able to advance so high up the FBI's ladder by narrating the entire plot blow by blow to the broad he was banging over in the DOJ. No shit, their text messages read like a daytime soap opera where the characters always think out loud. Peter Strzok tanked the Mueller investigation, you guessed it, via more text messages, and he also stated therein that Obama wants to know all the details. Wait a minute, did the POTUS want frequent updates of the coup attempt or was he running the whole damn thing? Hopefully for the sake of those that worship the ground Obama walks on that when Peter Strzok is given his treason charges, that he takes one for the team and doesn't roll over on #44, but we all know that's not how it going to go, lol.

Now that the Mueller hoax is done and the Weissman Report has been released to the public 98.5% unredacted, the left find's themselves completely out of options to keep that myth continue to be floated. The OIG Michael Horowitz just recommended that AG Barr prosecute James Comey the former director of the FBI for lying and leaking. Barr however has chosen to not prosecute James for this set of crimes. It is likely that Comey is snitching his face off because he is definitely not out of the woods yet. FISA documents as well as SpyGate documents are expected to be declassified to the public any day now which will completely erode the already thin ground that the Russia hoax laid its foundation on.

The future looks very bright and all of the soon to come legal actions of the AG and his special prosecutor John Durham will cast a shitty light on the DNC as a whole leading all the way up to the elections in 2020. The Dem candidate won't stand a chance.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Deep state will arrest more members of shallow state.
"Sir, we investigated the oranges. Pretty sure they said that you can be charged after you leave office."
 
Skybound420

Skybound420

Well-Known Member
Chunky Stool said:
Nice try. :dunce:
We are talking about obstruction.
Click to expand...
We were talking about the original crime of investigating if Hillary's pee pee dossier was valid and Trump colluded with the evil Russians. That never happened, it was all made up, therefore the investigation is totally baseless. The special counsel wasted years to conclude on that. the AG is not pursuing legal actions against the pres. You have nothing and nobody to prosecute that which you don't even have. As they say in poker, you're drawing dead!
 
Skybound420

Skybound420

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
Except for all the campaign related stuff that got so many members of his campaign sentenced to years in prison. Aside from all those crimes and convictions, there was no crime committed.
Click to expand...
No, not even "the campaign related stuff", there was no legal reason to look and the president does have his rights you know.
 
Skybound420

Skybound420

Well-Known Member
TacoMac said:
Really? Odd...because, well...ummm...

Click to expand...
Are you aware that the there must be evidence of a crime for investigators to start looking? All of the "crimes" in your graphic are process crimes committed after the investigation and would not have occurred but for the investigation, which is why it is so important that people are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Are you of the opinion that every politician that has someone that might speak ill of them should be investigated to the same degree Trump was to see if said politician will communicate something in 2 differnet ways and thus are now guilty of perjury?
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Skybound420 said:
Are you aware that the there must be evidence of a crime for investigators to start looking?
Click to expand...
No, the investigation is actually the means by which evidence is gathered. There simply has to be reasonable suspicion in order to start an investigation. Comey himself alleges that the president committed obstruction. That is sufficient. He fired Comey for not pledging allegiance. That was the first obstruction.
 
Skybound420

Skybound420

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
So crimes (which have been proven, leading to convictions) in your mind do not equate to a legal reason.

We're going to have fun with you.
Click to expand...
You're going to have fun because there are 6 anti-Trumpers against 1 pro-Trumper, not because you're right, morally or factually. The process that was used to force those crimes to happen and since rkymtnman is predicting the future, I also will do the same and state that Bill Barr is on the cusp of long dicking your entire movement and leading it all back to Obama, Clinton and the dirty dirty dirty DNC.

I realize you monkeys are going to do your best to keep the subject strictly on Mueller and crimes, and perjury and manafort, and that's fine to kick around old news, especially if it contributes to help you make sense of this new world post Russian collusion, well then I am happy to help.

As far as all of your concerns, and what abouts, and CRIMES, and RUSSIANS. Face it, all you have left to pursue these things is your crazy congress. The actual judicial branch is moving in a total opposite direction and it's just sad that you all cannot move past this.
 
Skybound420

Skybound420

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
No, the investigation is actually the means by which evidence is gathered. There simply has to be reasonable suspicion in order to start an investigation. Comey himself alleges that the president committed obstruction. That is sufficient. He fired Comey for not pledging allegiance. That was the first obstruction.
Click to expand...
So you're saying the FBI needs no reason at all to begin an investigation into anybody other than their own desire to see if evidence of a crime exists?

How did you survive childhood?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top