I never said "you dont know" or claimed anything of the sort. I was simply adding a dynamic to the conversation, plain and simple. I really didnt know if you knew (how the hell could I?) that an overwhelming percentage of oil is produced and priced by state-run companies (which is essentially the entire world market, which is our market). There was never a question of right or wrong man, your brought that BS into the picture. I was not disagreeing with your words, at all. Like I said, I was adding another dynamic, pure and simple. I am not going to hound you for proof of MY words, I know what I said and I never brought the "right vs. wrong" equation into this, and I refuse to do so. If you cannot see that my original comment was only in the nature of expanding the conversation, I dont know what to tell you. But this he said/he said stuff is just pointless.
You stated I wasn't privy to information that you had..... sounds like you are saying I don't know what I'm talking about?
It's alway a corporate/Capitalist conspiracy with you folks. Why isn't OPEC, the world largest cartel ever blamed for gauging us? There is never anything nefarious going on and with all the governmental panels and investigation nothing has ever been found. Gas is expensive because we have failed to be Capitalist and we imbrace the Government as the solution and regulator of everthing that is good.
Since when has OPEC set prices? Not since the 80's.... oil is traded on the mercantile exchange and goes to the highest bidder. Please explain how gas is high because of our failure to be capitalists? Nothing has ever been found? I challenge you to prove that, as the findings are always the same, supply and demand...
Everything in bold is what I see to be "WRONG" with your statements. These ideas highlight a shallow and novice exposure to the energy industry and current constraints to production and the relative jump in prices.
You cannot source your "73%" claim, prove me WRONG on that, please. I would wager that its closer to 94% (which makes them more of an international player than domestic) Futhermore, it's not like every single refinery or well owned and operated by these companies is here in the US, do some research, they are operating in countries where it is economically disadvantageous or even impossible to import to the US. Many oil projects are international conglomerates, in which there are already predetermined consumers in mind, most of the time (especially with the newer developments) the US is not on the recieving end. Meaning that their profits (as you erroneously stated) are not derived from "selling US crude overseas," but from their own international endeavors from foriegn sources.
As far as oil and national security issues, I would like to direct your attention to something called the SPR. Oil and national security have long been correllated. Nobody seems to take issue with that. I mean, who do you think provides the filler for the reserves?
And your claim: "that is the PRIMARY reason" for the cost increase is easily rebuked.
Do you really think that everything happening in the Middle East is of no consequence to oil prices, or that declining production is of no consequence to oil prices...
If you are willing to engage in a civil exchange of ideas, I am game.
So now i'm shallow and novice? and you want me to have a discussion with you, even after your smart ass remarks? you're kidding? right?
My 73% figure was from memory. I read the breakdown on MSNBC Tuesday, after Monday's earnings reports. Sales of US Crude to foreign markets is hardly 94%. Are you also suggesting it is cheaper to tank oil to a foreign country to refine to gas and ship it back as gas is cheaper than refining oil here? Where did you arrive at that conclusion? You challenge me to do research, yet you haven't done any. The US is the 5th largest refiner in the world. Even Iran doesn't refine it's own oil. You want sources? OK,.....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_oil_refineries#North_America
Also, Exxon does indeed sell US CRUDE on the open market, They also sell heating oil, and gasoline, refined right here in the states, going to foreign countries willing to pay the premium...
http://www.platts.com/weblog/oilblog/2010/05/09/us_oil_exp.html
Many oil projects are international conglomerates, in which there are already predetermined consumers in mind, most of the time (especially with the newer developments) the US is not on the recieving end. Meaning that their profits (as you erroneously stated) are not derived from "selling US crude overseas," but from their own international endeavors from foriegn sources.
Uh, you don;t get it.. or you are twisting words.... Profits are indeed generated from selling US oil and oil products to the foreign market. My point was, "why open up more shores to drilling when they oil they drill now goes to foreign markets?"
My exact words were...
So if BP and Exxon are selling the majority of their US oil overseas, how does opening up more wells decrease inflationary pressures? The arguments listed are very weak and sound like something an oil company would claim...
How you are tying profits to that remark baffles me.... I'm merely pointing out that the majority of what they drill in US territory ends up in other markets, not the US market. Therefore opening up additional well sources is pointless, it's just going to go to the highest bidder anyways.
And how in the hell do you discern that I think the middle east unrest has no effect on prices? Do you really read that between my lines?
If unrest affects production, then supply is shortened and the price goes up.
try again... point out where I stated that oil companies set prices, minus refinery output.... I never did...