Drone not ours wait yes it is!!!!

Smirgen

Well-Known Member
Iran Doesnt need any drones to know that we have WMD's or are intent on going to war against them.
we are to Iran what we claimed Iraq was to us, If Iran doesnt get a nuke fast they are so fucked.
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
Iran Doesnt need any drones to know that we have WMD's or are intent on going to war against them.
we are to Iran what we claimed Iraq was to us, If Iran doesnt get a nuke fast they are so fucked.
They may be screwed either way. A nuke MAY give them a small bargaining chip, but rest assured there are military units training for this exact scenario. IF they get a viable weapon anytime soon, they will likely have to fight hard to keep it.:twisted:
 

Purplestickeypunch

Active Member
I say Fuck IRAN,,,and there Theologist way of life!!!,,,You should to,,,Ya fucking sympathiser,,,do nothing but cry baby....Get a Job....LOL,,,and cut your hair:razz:,,,and please clean your pathetic soul:twisted: LOL.....
LOL just because I see things differently doesn't mean I don't say fuck them. I just don't think we should be the ones getting the STD from doing the job. I say fuck you to the majority of the globe when it comes to being their buddy. It doesn't mean I have to hate them though. (the way the majority of the world hates us...)

I think this misconception is why some people dislike Ron Paul's stance on foreign policy. He wants our defense to be stronger. Our offence to stop. And trade with countries that we've otherwise not. I don't think he has gotten to his age and accomplished the things he has by being a softy. I believe that if ANY country were to start some shit with the US; Ron Paul would advise whoever to back off. If/when the other party declines, he will then ask congress for consent to go to war. If it is congress deems it justifiable; he will remove their country from the map. Now, this doesn't include an outright, no warning attack. For instance; had Japan not sent a warning before bombing Pearl Harbor. The president would then have the authority to defend the country without congressional consent. I just want to be clear that I'm not talking about waiting to be struck before we defend. We are more than capable to watch the globe from home and have the firepower that is able to dispatch any threat long before it becomes a concern to our mainland.

SNL did a skit about the candidates that I think nailed it.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/16/snl-yet-another-gop-debate_n_1013928.html
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
They may be screwed either way. A nuke MAY give them a small bargaining chip, but rest assured there are military units training for this exact scenario. IF they get a viable weapon anytime soon, they will likely have to fight hard to keep it.:twisted:
Really? Are we going to bomb them every time they produce another bomb?

This policy has no exit scenario. We just decide certain countries cannot have certain things and break their sovereignty and bomb them when they proceed. Who are we to do this?

America is supposed to have a military for DEFENSE...

We have attacked Iraq, Afganistan, Pakistan, Libya, and we are putting troops in Australia and other countries in some sort of faceoff with the Chinese.

And that is within the last YEAR.

The politicians do whatever they want and the people have no will to oppose them.
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
Really? Are we going to bomb them every time they produce another bomb?

This policy has no exit scenario. We just decide certain countries cannot have certain things and break their sovereignty and bomb them when they proceed. Who are we to do this?

America is supposed to have a military for DEFENSE...

We have attacked Iraq, Afganistan, Pakistan, Libya, and we are putting troops in Australia and other countries in some sort of faceoff with the Chinese.

And that is within the last YEAR.

The politicians do whatever they want and the people have no will to oppose them.
Whoa!:-? Don't shoot the messenger bro! I'm not saying it's right. It just IS. "The War on Terror" has no exit scenario either.;-)


What's YOUR solution? Just let them develop nukes? Perhaps they will give a couple to Hezbollah? Maybe sell a couple to Hamas? You DO remember our ferocious little lap dog, Israel, don't you? Do you think THEY are going to allow Iran to get a nuke? Hell no! And I honestly don't blame them. Look, we are in extraordinary times. Just this morning I saw that the U.S. had frozen $700 million in aid to Pakistan. We recently had a bunch of CIA informants and handlers "outted" in Lebanon (by Hezbollah). Iran somehow came into posession of one of our stealth drones recently. I don't like any of our options here. Wait and let them develop whatever WMD's they desire (which would probably be the proper thing to do)? Bomb them every time they get close to developing a nuke? We have gone to war for a lot less than one of our sworn enemies for almost 40 years developing nukes. I sincerely hope we don't go to war with Iran for ANY REASON, but it may already be too late.:cry:
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Whoa!:-? Don't shoot the messenger bro! I'm not saying it's right. It just IS. "The War on Terror" has no exit scenario either.;-)


What's YOUR solution? Just let them develop nukes? Perhaps they will give a couple to Hezbollah? Maybe sell a couple to Hamas? You DO remember our ferocious little lap dog, Israel, don't you? Do you think THEY are going to allow Iran to get a nuke? Hell no! And I honestly don't blame them. Look, we are in extraordinary times. Just this morning I saw that the U.S. had frozen $700 million in aid to Pakistan. We recently had a bunch of CIA informants and handlers "outted" in Lebanon (by Hezbollah). Iran somehow came into posession of one of our stealth drones recently. I don't like any of our options here. Wait and let them develop whatever WMD's they desire (which would probably be the proper thing to do)? Bomb them every time they get close to developing a nuke? We have gone to war for a lot less than one of our sworn enemies for almost 40 years developing nukes. I sincerely hope we don't go to war with Iran for ANY REASON, but it may already be too late.:cry:
My solution is that it is not our problem. Our government likes to get into endless wars. War on drugs, war on terrorism, war on poverty, etc...

Let the UN sort it out. If Israel feels the need to attack Iran then let THEM sort it out.

The constant determination that the US government has all the answers and just needs to spend a little more money on another program is false.

We need to pull our military back, focus our attention on our own business and lead by example, not by force. Not that I think there is a chance in hell that our politicians who constantly spend their lives grabbing and consolidating more power from the people who gladly give it up to be sheep would dream of ever doing something like that.

I am not yelling at you, I am just yelling...
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
My solution is that it is not our problem. Our government likes to get into endless wars. War on drugs, war on terrorism, war on poverty, etc...

Let the UN sort it out. If Israel feels the need to attack Iran then let THEM sort it out.

The constant determination that the US government has all the answers and just needs to spend a little more money on another program is false.

We need to pull our military back, focus our attention on our own business and lead by example, not by force. Not that I think there is a chance in hell that our politicians who constantly spend their lives grabbing and consolidating more power from the people who gladly give it up to be sheep would dream of ever doing something like that.

I am not yelling at you, I am just yelling...
Ok, 'cause it SEEMED like you were saying I was ok with all of this or somehow supported our hawkish approach to foreign policy. For the record, I do not. I'm not saying we shouldn't ever intervene militarily, but I agree, we are already fighting too many nebulous, shadowy, boogey men. You realize that every action of Israel's is looked upon as an action of the U.S. whether we support it or not? We can't win either way here.:cry:
 

RawBudzski

Well-Known Member
Even if they do give it back, it has already been inspected & the blueprints were emailed to russia & china shortly after. <3
 

RawBudzski

Well-Known Member
Drones are supposed to self-destruct. As are our manned air-crafts internal cpu & secret gadgets are supposed to fry if going downnnn
I'm curious as to why this thing didn't self destruct once it fell into enemy hands.:-?
They say it was disabled/intercepted via electronics, guesses being it was Hacked or had electronics fried by some sort of emp.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Drones are supposed to self-destruct.

They say it was disabled/intercepted via electronics, guesses being it was Hacked or had electronics fried by some sort of emp.
At the moment I dont believe what either side says about whether it was disabled, hacked, controlled, etc...
 

RawBudzski

Well-Known Member
Nor do I, this is above all our heads. && like everything else, they can just spin it any way they want & ppl will believe it.

you know what they say ! one failed rocket into space is one successful launch of a military spy satellite. .. .well.. I say that. :P
 

PeachOibleBoiblePeach#1

Well-Known Member
I think,,,Technology and a few good sale's men,,,and a need pushed the drone before it's time,,,Ya never know,,,Maybe,,,it was intentional and we are givin' away an old secret to test "Our new technology"....Beware...Iran...China...Pakastan...Russia...bongsmilie:eyesmoke: Oh Yea...Forgot about North korea...
 

The Cryptkeeper

Well-Known Member
Nice. :D I believe it was intentionally let to fall in order to give Iran another example that the US is watching them. :) I believe it's call an Act of Belligerence?
 
Top