drug testing welfare recipients

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Bucky, NPR is to the left as fox is to the right.
that's not true at all, and i would challenge you to find a biased piece of reporting from them, ever. but that is pointless since they do not do biased reporting.

but if it were true, you'd be saying that the left is the most informed audience in america, while the right is less informed than those who watch no news at all.

lullerskates.
 

The_Herban_Legend

Well-Known Member
that's not true at all, and i would challenge you to find a biased piece of reporting from them, ever. but that is pointless since they do not do biased reporting.

but if it were true, you'd be saying that the left is the most informed audience in america, while the right is less informed than those who watch no news at all.

lullerskates.
On social issues, I am very liberal. NPR is one of several sources I gather my data from on politics and current events. NPR definitely leans to the left. I misspoke, they are not as far to the left as fox news is to the right but they still lean left.
 

The_Herban_Legend

Well-Known Member
then you should have no problem showing me all the biased reporting they are putting out.

don't be shy, be a legend.
It's not so much that they report on a bias towards the left, it's that they don't dig deep into stories that involve political figures to the left. Examples; Benghazi, Operation fast and furious, etc etc.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
It's not so much that they report on a bias towards the left, it's that they don't dig deep into stories that involve political figures to the left. Examples; Benghazi, Operation fast and furious, etc etc.
well over two dozen stories on all aspects of beghazi, retard.

http://www.npr.org/tags/162350245/benghazi-attack

another two dozen+ on gun running to mexico (which started under bush).

http://www.npr.org/tags/137200249/fast-and-furious

you are simply wrong in every conceivable way.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
The fact that you are defending NPR speaks volumes. Not once have I ever heard you defend fox news. Coincidence? I think not!
why would i defend fox news? people who watch it are less informed than those who watch no news at all.

NPR is completely unbiased and has the best informed viewers of anyone.
 

The_Herban_Legend

Well-Known Member

The_Herban_Legend

Well-Known Member
why would i defend fox news? people who watch it are less informed than those who watch no news at all.

NPR is completely unbiased and has the best informed viewers of anyone.
NPR is less biased than fox news but still biased to the left. If one deep throats a cock and one licks a cock, are they not both cocksuckers?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I did't say they didn't report on these incidents, what I said was they don't dig as deep if the political figure is on the left. Practice your comprehension skills.
you need to provide citation for all these retarded claims you are making.

those two dozen+ reports on each of your retarded examples proves they do dig quite deep into all aspects, hence why they have the best informed viewers.

retard.
 
Top