Fascist Facebook???

CrackerJax

New Member
well for once u r right.... I'm not interested in Google news...at all.

I think I'll stick with my source.... since it comes from the HORSES MOUTH.


We are socialists because we see in socialism, that is the union of all citizens, the only chance to maintain our racial inheritance and to regain our political freedom and renew our German state.
Socialism is the doctrine of liberation for the working class. It promotes the rise of the fourth class and its incorporation in the political organism of our Fatherland, and is inextricably bound to breaking the present slavery and the regaining of German freedom. Socialism therefore is not merely a matter of the oppressed class, but a matter for everyone, for freeing the German people from slavery is the goal of contemporary policy. Socialism gains its true form only through a total combat brotherhood with the forward-striving energies of a newly awakened nationalism. Without nationalism it is nothing, a phantom, a mere theory, a castle in the sky, a book. With it it is everything, the future, freedom, the Fatherland!
The sin of liberal thinking was to overlook socialism's nation-building strengths, thereby allowing its energies to go in anti-national directions. The sin of Marxism was to degrade socialism into a question of wages and the stomach, putting it in conflict with the state and its national existence. An understanding of both these facts leads us to a new sense of socialism, which sees its nature as nationalistic, state-building, liberating and constructive.
The bourgeois is about to leave the historical stage. In its place will come the class of productive workers, the working class, that has been up until today oppressed. It is beginning to fulfill its political mission. It is involved in a hard and bitter struggle for political power as it seeks to become part of the national organism. The battle began in the economic realm; it will finish in the political. It is not merely a matter of pay, not only a matter of the number of hours worked in a day-though we may never forget that these are an essential, perhaps even the most significant part of the socialist platform-but it is much more a matter of incorporating a powerful and responsible class in the state, perhaps even to make it the dominant force in the future politics of the Fatherland. The bourgeois does not want to recognize the strength of the working class. Marxism has forced it into a straitjacket that will ruin it. While the working class gradually disintegrates in the Marxist front, bleeding itself dry, the bourgeois and Marxism have agreed on the general lines of capitalism, and see their task now to protect and defend it in various ways, often concealed.
We are socialists because we see the social question as a matter of necessity and justice for the very existence of a state for our people, not a question of cheap pity or insulting sentimentality. The worker has a claim to a living standard that corresponds to what he produces. We have no intention of begging for that right. Incorporating him in the state organism is not only a critical matter for him, but for the whole nation. The question is larger than the eight-hour day. It is a matter of forming a new state consciousness that includes every productive citizen. Since the political powers of the day are neither willing nor able to create such a situation, socialism must be fought for. It is a fighting slogan both inwardly and outwardly. It is aimed domestically at the bourgeois parties and Marxism at the same time, because both are sworn enemies of the coming workers' state. It is directed abroad at all powers that threaten our national existence and thereby the possibility of the coming socialist national state.
Socialism is possible only in a state that is united domestically and free internationally. The bourgeois and Marxism are responsible for failing to reach both goals, domestic unity and international freedom. No matter how national and social these two forces present themselves, they are the sworn enemies of a socialist national state.
We must therefore break both groups politically. The lines of German socialism are sharp, and our path is clear.
We are against the political bourgeois, and for genuine nationalism!
We are against Marxism, but for true socialism!
We are for the first German national state of a socialist nature!
We are for the National Socialist German Workers Party!
 

tinyTURTLE

Well-Known Member
well for once u r right.... I'm not interested in Google news...at all.

I think I'll stick with my source.... since it comes from the HORSES MOUTH.


We are socialists because we see in socialism, that is the union of all citizens, the only chance to maintain our racial inheritance and to regain our political freedom and renew our German state.
Socialism is the doctrine of liberation for the working class. It promotes the rise of the fourth class and its incorporation in the political organism of our Fatherland, and is inextricably bound to breaking the present slavery and the regaining of German freedom. Socialism therefore is not merely a matter of the oppressed class, but a matter for everyone, for freeing the German people from slavery is the goal of contemporary policy. Socialism gains its true form only through a total combat brotherhood with the forward-striving energies of a newly awakened nationalism. Without nationalism it is nothing, a phantom, a mere theory, a castle in the sky, a book. With it it is everything, the future, freedom, the Fatherland!
The sin of liberal thinking was to overlook socialism's nation-building strengths, thereby allowing its energies to go in anti-national directions. The sin of Marxism was to degrade socialism into a question of wages and the stomach, putting it in conflict with the state and its national existence. An understanding of both these facts leads us to a new sense of socialism, which sees its nature as nationalistic, state-building, liberating and constructive.
The bourgeois is about to leave the historical stage. In its place will come the class of productive workers, the working class, that has been up until today oppressed. It is beginning to fulfill its political mission. It is involved in a hard and bitter struggle for political power as it seeks to become part of the national organism. The battle began in the economic realm; it will finish in the political. It is not merely a matter of pay, not only a matter of the number of hours worked in a day-though we may never forget that these are an essential, perhaps even the most significant part of the socialist platform-but it is much more a matter of incorporating a powerful and responsible class in the state, perhaps even to make it the dominant force in the future politics of the Fatherland. The bourgeois does not want to recognize the strength of the working class. Marxism has forced it into a straitjacket that will ruin it. While the working class gradually disintegrates in the Marxist front, bleeding itself dry, the bourgeois and Marxism have agreed on the general lines of capitalism, and see their task now to protect and defend it in various ways, often concealed.
We are socialists because we see the social question as a matter of necessity and justice for the very existence of a state for our people, not a question of cheap pity or insulting sentimentality. The worker has a claim to a living standard that corresponds to what he produces. We have no intention of begging for that right. Incorporating him in the state organism is not only a critical matter for him, but for the whole nation. The question is larger than the eight-hour day. It is a matter of forming a new state consciousness that includes every productive citizen. Since the political powers of the day are neither willing nor able to create such a situation, socialism must be fought for. It is a fighting slogan both inwardly and outwardly. It is aimed domestically at the bourgeois parties and Marxism at the same time, because both are sworn enemies of the coming workers' state. It is directed abroad at all powers that threaten our national existence and thereby the possibility of the coming socialist national state.
Socialism is possible only in a state that is united domestically and free internationally. The bourgeois and Marxism are responsible for failing to reach both goals, domestic unity and international freedom. No matter how national and social these two forces present themselves, they are the sworn enemies of a socialist national state.
We must therefore break both groups politically. The lines of German socialism are sharp, and our path is clear.
We are against the political bourgeois, and for genuine nationalism!
We are against Marxism, but for true socialism!
We are for the first German national state of a socialist nature!
We are for the National Socialist German Workers Party!
so there are shades of socialism, just like there are shades of any other ideology or doctrine. and nazi socialism is a nuanced variance of marxist socialism. big whoop.
 

Katatawnic

Well-Known Member
Isn't that the REAL reason why all of you "progressives" (what an oxymoron) cannot admit the SIMPLE and BASIC truth?
Actually, "progressives" isn't an oxymoron. ;) An oxymoron is a figure of speech that combines two normally contradictory terms. Oxymoron is a Greek term derived from oxy ("sharp") and moros ("dull"). Thus the word "oxymoron" is itself an oxymoron. :mrgreen:

Jumbo shrimp, bittersweet, act naturally, same difference, clearly misunderstood, alone together, seriously funny, deafening silence, Microsoft Works... OK, now I'm just having fun thinking up commonly used oxymora. :lol:
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member


Actually, "progressives" isn't an oxymoron. ;) An oxymoron is a figure of speech that combines two normally contradictory terms. Oxymoron is a Greek term derived from oxy ("sharp") and moros ("dull"). Thus the word "oxymoron" is itself an oxymoron. :mrgreen:

Jumbo shrimp, bittersweet, act naturally, same difference, clearly misunderstood, alone together, seriously funny, deafening silence, Microsoft Works... OK, now I'm just having fun thinking up commonly used oxymora. :lol:
Living dead, alone in a crowd, pretty ugly... and I think this one can now be used.....one smart Cracker...;-)
 

CrackerJax

New Member


Actually, "progressives" isn't an oxymoron. ;) An oxymoron is a figure of speech that combines two normally contradictory terms. Oxymoron is a Greek term derived from oxy ("sharp") and moros ("dull"). Thus the word "oxymoron" is itself an oxymoron. :mrgreen:

Jumbo shrimp, bittersweet, act naturally, same difference, clearly misunderstood, alone together, seriously funny, deafening silence, Microsoft Works... OK, now I'm just having fun thinking up commonly used oxymora. :lol:
hahah good one Kat.... never knew that...

I should have added progressive LIBERAL.... my mistake. You get a cookie!
 

CrackerJax

New Member
That's right! :lol:

If you don't...you'll end up as a progressive liberal...and life won't go your way.

Especially if you get your way.
 

Katatawnic

Well-Known Member
hahah good one Kat.... never knew that...

I should have added progressive LIBERAL.... my mistake. You get a cookie!
That's funny right there! :clap: What's really funny about it is that in my last post, I was going to add that "progressive liberal" could be considered an oxymoron, depending on who's deciding at the time as that one, too, would be subjective. ;)

Now for that cookie... is it a very potent canna cookie per chance? Cause I'm really close to sawing my legs off and getting it over with once and for all. But then my arms/shoulders would be next, then my back and chest... and I'm just not quite ready to be a literal head on a pillow just yet. :lol:
 

CrackerJax

New Member


That's funny right there! :clap: What's really funny about it is that in my last post, I was going to add that "progressive liberal" could be considered an oxymoron, depending on who's deciding at the time as that one, too, would be subjective. ;)

Now for that cookie... is it a very potent canna cookie per chance? Cause I'm really close to sawing my legs off and getting it over with once and for all. But then my arms/shoulders would be next, then my back and chest... and I'm just not quite ready to be a literal head on a pillow just yet. :lol:
I'm sure you would make a very good looking "first base"

Can Kat come out and play?

Now cracker, you know Kat has no arms or legs

I know, but we need a first base.
 

Katatawnic

Well-Known Member
i'd like to see you saw your chest off with no arms... nice try.
we don't beleive you.
Well, my man always says he'll do anything for me. :mrgreen:

I'm sure you would make a very good looking "first base"

Can Kat come out and play?

Now cracker, you know Kat has no arms or legs

I know, but we need a first base.
I'm not sure whether to take that as you implying I'm to be stomped on, or that I'm easy. :confused: Either way, that wasn't very nice. :finger: :lol:
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Never heard that joke growing up?

Knock on the door. Mother answers

Jimmy: Can Timmy come out and play?

Mother: Now Jimmy, you know little Tim doesn't have any arms or legs

Jimmy: I know, but we're playing baseball and we need a first base.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Okay... me too. I figured everyone had heard of that one... the "Johnny" jokes ... I used to be able to rattle off a dozen quickly.... :lol: No longer...
 

Katatawnic

Well-Known Member
HAH! Being a Jew according to "Hebrew law" (my maternal great-grandparents escaped the Holocaust; German Jews), I had loads of the greatest JAP jokes. Also had a ton of great Pollack jokes, having grown up in Wisconsin. Unfortunately, I've forgotten the majority of them... and they were some really good ones, too!
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Here's a true story...

I knew a Polish family. Chuck was my best friend and his dad had an awesome walrus moustache... a bear of a man. Called us the "ding a lings".... great guy, great family, but ultimately quite Polish...:lol:

One Xmas, they buy a HUGE tree and when I walk into their living room, the tree appeared to be going up through the ceiling. I was like WTF? :lol:

"The tree was too big for our room".

"So why didn't you cut the bottom instead"? I asked.

Silence........... total silence.

Polish to the end! FTW!!
 
Top