Firearms Freindly Collective?

TheMan13

TheMan13

Well-Known Member
Just buy that plane ticket to reality fucktard. You cannot hide in your mothers basement forever punk.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
UncleBuck said:
an assault rifle or assault weapon describes a certain type of weapon, specifically a semi automatic, military style rifle.

you don't need one of those for self defense.
Click to expand...
An assault rifle has a select-fire provision. The last semi-auto-only assault rifle was the SKS, Simonov's semiautomatic carbine of 1945. It was supplanted by Russia's other assault rifle, Kalashnikov's confection of '47.
As there is no such thing as a nonassault weapon, it's like saying Most Extreme.

You don't need a V8 to power a car, and that doesn't disqualify V8s as eminently practical choices sometimes. cn
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
An assault rifle has a select-fire provision. The last semi-auto-only assault rifle was the SKS, Simonov's semiautomatic carbine.
As there is no such thing as a nonassault weapon, it's like saying Most Extreme.

You don't need a V8 to power a car, and that doesn't disqualify V8s as eminently practical choices sometimes. cn
Click to expand...
comparing a V8 for transportation to an AR15 for self defense is just silly.
 
TheMan13

TheMan13

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
An assault rifle has a select-fire provision. The last semi-auto-only assault rifle was the SKS, Simonov's semiautomatic carbine.
As there is no such thing as a nonassault weapon, it's like saying Most Extreme.

You don't need a V8 to power a car, and that doesn't disqualify V8s as eminently practical choices sometimes. cn
Click to expand...
What does a tool, and/or the control of, have to do what so ever with the CRIME you fear or the MOTIVE for such?

These politicians just need to stop wasting our time and come up with some true answers to a much more complex problem within our society than the fabricated metal control they currently are pushing.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
TheMan13 said:
What does a tool, and/or the control of, have to do what so ever with the CRIME you fear or the MOTIVE for such?

These politicians just need to stop wasting our time and come up with some true answers to a much more complex problem within our society than the fabricated metal control they currently are pushing.
Click to expand...
At first I read "fabricated mental control". Some would argue that that is also applicable. cn
 
Prawn Connery

Prawn Connery

Well-Known Member
ProdigalSun said:
There are exactly no "nuts" that are allowed to buy even a single firearm.


Gun control isn't about guns, it's about control. Show me one gun law that would prevent a school shooting, and I will vote for it.
Click to expand...
That's interesting, because the only school shooting we've had here in Australia in the past 20 years was by a student who was later acquitted on insanity, LOL!

I've no problem with people joining gun clubs, or farmers owning firearms to dispatch animals, or even regulated hunting.

But I'm sure glad I don't have to walk down the street and worry about getting into an argument with someone and having a gun pulled on me. Gun crime is pretty rare here. Because guns are pretty rare.

The problem in America is there are so many firearms already in the community that those who carry firearms to protect themselves from others carrying firearms have legitimate concerns, IMO.

But just think how nice it would be if no-one felt the need to carry a concealed weapon - because no-one else was. That's pretty much what it's like here.

As for assault rifles, well it only took one massacre in 1996 for us to ban them - and you won't find many people here who disagree with that decision. There hasn't been anything like the Port Arthur Massacre since.

In a way, you guys in the States are damned if you do, damned if you don't - you will never be free of your gun culture, which is kinda sad. I'm just glad it never got to that stage here.
 
TheMan13

TheMan13

Well-Known Member
The equation was intended to be absurd you shit stain. Here in reality we do not use absurd variables, as the outcome would be just as absurd. If you had the intellect of spit, the reality would be obvious: Motive + Crime = Problem. Hence banning any variance of any weapon fails to address the problem fucktard, only ignorance considers a gun part of mental illness.
 
abe supercro

abe supercro

Well-Known Member
You kinda fell into that one Buck!

Now perhaps James, or whomever psycho m'f'er, would have geared his training tools accordingly to clean house. Ninjas adapt to the terrain buckminster fuller.. Don't shoot me w/ your face. lol
 
HomeLessBeans

HomeLessBeans

New Member
UncleBuck said:
you're right, james holmes would have been just as deadly with a baseball bat or ninja stars.
Click to expand...
That the batman theatre guy? How about if he used door chains and gasoline? I'm bettin he could have upped he 'score'.


What is the 'gun show loophole'??? Do u even know? Can u explain it to poor ole me? I've been to a couple Lookin but can never spot it. Every one I have been too has background checks. So where is that hole I hear so much about?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top