Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
Met a guy who does oxygen wax. Had no idea how complicated it was. The machine he uses to make it ran him $50k. Crazy shit. Picked some up. Looks super tasty.
Highest THC Content?
- Thread starter gotdemgurns?
- Start date
Matt Rize
Hashmaster
Sick. Eden Labs sells the CO2 and Tamisium sells the BHO extractors.
Here's the link to Full Spectrum Lab's highes THC, they have a tab just for this thread.
http://fullspectrumlabs.com/featured/all-time/?type=raw+plant+material
And the winner is....
White Dog
Primary Cannabinoid: THCRatio Rarity: 4%
Form: Raw Plant MaterialMoisture: 11.12%
Calculated Active Cannabinoids
CBD: 0.74%
CBN: 0.24%
THC: 29.21%
CBC: 0%
THCV: 0%
Total Active Cannabinoids: 30.18%
http://fullspectrumlabs.com/featured/all-time/?type=plant+extract
CBD28
Primary Cannabinoid: CBDRatio Rarity: 28%
Form: Plant ExtractMoisture: N/A
CBD28' href='#' rel='test-image'>
Calculated Active Cannabinoids
CBD: 5.93%
CBN: 0.75%
THC: 80.35%
CBC: 0%
THCV: 0%
Total Active Cannabinoids: 87.02%
Here's the highest ice water hash:
http://fullspectrumlabs.com/test/1104446/
Chemdawg D 90 Micron
Primary Cannabinoid: THCRatio Rarity: 1%
Form: Plant ExtractMoisture: N/A
Calculated Active Cannabinoids
CBD: 1.7%
CBN: 0.19%
THC: 74.43%
CBC: 3.24%
THCV: 0%
Total Active Cannabinoids: 79.56%
Orestesol
Member
idk about 40% THC or anything like that, but i do know that at a local dispensary they were selling a packet of seeds with a "supposed" THC% of 28%. can't remember the name but i'll never forget the 28% because it was the highest i've ever seen with my own two eyes. idk if that helps, but it's MY personal experience
FuegoDeBomba
Member
First time chiming in on a thread... Full Spectrum Labs appears to be down, so I can't confirm your White Dog (is that a White Widow x Chemdog?) Sounds great and you seem to be trustworthy.
Y Griega reports a 27.12% as tested by CANNA Research. Do you feel that they are a reputable Lab? Do you have any experience with this strain??
http://en.seedfinder.eu/strain-info/Y_Griega/Medical_Seeds_Co/
http://www.pickandmixseeds.co.uk/search?q=y+griega
IMHO Testing is subject to submitted material a cleaned up flower would have 15-25%+ Sativa dom. strains tend to have a Higher THC%, but most people I've discussed this subject with and myself will tell you it has been an Indica Dom. strain that has given the their strongest high or "really fucked them up!" Is this perhaps due to the tested material having more of the plant remaining in it? I've noticed that an Indica dom. has more of a swollen calyx than Sativa dom.. No science needed to see that it's a much beefier bud!
The best lab I've found for a more accurate/detailed potency testing is SC Labs. They focus on 8 of the 420+ compounds founds in cannabis.
http://www.scanalytical.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=105&Itemid=304
It would seem that they (as well as other labs) have identified THCV as the compound that would appear to be higher in the cannabis that has been submitted that people have smoke tested as a strong and powerful "really fucked up" high.
So on the subject of which strain is the most potent, there are no review sites that list a full scientific test breakdown, as well as a experienced smoke test breakdown. I personally try to find the combo of both book smarts and street smarts so to speak. I tend to give more weight to the experienced knowledge than the educated knowledge, but both are very important. I have my consistent strain I go with and test another on the side each time. I would recommend the same to anybody, because the medium, lights, nutes, and environment you grow in more than likely will not be the same as the person who submitted the the strains test to the lab.
You could just go with the commercial cup winners, or the trendy club flavor of the month with some cute name and be satisfied. You could also think for yourself... grow, breed, educate, and develop your own for yourself. Thanks to all of you here that do this and contribute! This is a great thread!!
BUILD YOUR EXPERIENCE AND YOU'LL FIND WHAT YOUR LOOKING FOR IN THE PROCESS!
Y Griega reports a 27.12% as tested by CANNA Research. Do you feel that they are a reputable Lab? Do you have any experience with this strain??
http://en.seedfinder.eu/strain-info/Y_Griega/Medical_Seeds_Co/
http://www.pickandmixseeds.co.uk/search?q=y+griega
IMHO Testing is subject to submitted material a cleaned up flower would have 15-25%+ Sativa dom. strains tend to have a Higher THC%, but most people I've discussed this subject with and myself will tell you it has been an Indica Dom. strain that has given the their strongest high or "really fucked them up!" Is this perhaps due to the tested material having more of the plant remaining in it? I've noticed that an Indica dom. has more of a swollen calyx than Sativa dom.. No science needed to see that it's a much beefier bud!
The best lab I've found for a more accurate/detailed potency testing is SC Labs. They focus on 8 of the 420+ compounds founds in cannabis.
http://www.scanalytical.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=105&Itemid=304
It would seem that they (as well as other labs) have identified THCV as the compound that would appear to be higher in the cannabis that has been submitted that people have smoke tested as a strong and powerful "really fucked up" high.
So on the subject of which strain is the most potent, there are no review sites that list a full scientific test breakdown, as well as a experienced smoke test breakdown. I personally try to find the combo of both book smarts and street smarts so to speak. I tend to give more weight to the experienced knowledge than the educated knowledge, but both are very important. I have my consistent strain I go with and test another on the side each time. I would recommend the same to anybody, because the medium, lights, nutes, and environment you grow in more than likely will not be the same as the person who submitted the the strains test to the lab.
You could just go with the commercial cup winners, or the trendy club flavor of the month with some cute name and be satisfied. You could also think for yourself... grow, breed, educate, and develop your own for yourself. Thanks to all of you here that do this and contribute! This is a great thread!!
BUILD YOUR EXPERIENCE AND YOU'LL FIND WHAT YOUR LOOKING FOR IN THE PROCESS!
burrr
Active Member
Who is GW?
stonedmetalhead1
Well-Known Member
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]I've been trying to find something I could quote online to prove to you all that THC isn't measured by % of weight of the bud and here's something I found. Anyone who tells you otherwise can apparently study GC/MS in school and still not have a clue what he's talking about and should maybe try and get a refund from whatever school he went to. The reason some Hash's and oils have higher % of THC? Because they are refined.
[/FONT]
[/FONT]
[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
[/FONT]
burrr
Active Member
why is this article more believable than getting info from full spectrum labs? who is the author, and how do his qualifications compare to those working at the lab?
Who was the one to declare "So the measurement they make is a percentage by weight of the oils in the sample, not of the overall weight of the sample." It was not in the response by richard mullins.
I can show you a website where they are sure that there is no such thing as over feritizing, or nutrient burn. Does not make it true.
Who was the one to declare "So the measurement they make is a percentage by weight of the oils in the sample, not of the overall weight of the sample." It was not in the response by richard mullins.
I can show you a website where they are sure that there is no such thing as over feritizing, or nutrient burn. Does not make it true.
stonedmetalhead1
Well-Known Member
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]The ratios are relative responses obtained by the particular method of analysis and so do not directly relate to actual ratios of the percentage compositions.
- Richard Mullins [/FONT](Drug Legislation and Enforcement Unit)
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
[/FONT]"So the measurement they make is a percentage by weight of the oils in the sample, not of the overall weight of the sample." This statement was made to explain Mullins statement to people with low reading cmprehension. The article was written by a marijuana activist group but the information was obtained from a government agency that's dealing with the regulation of marijuana in the UK not some idiot trying to profit off of medical marijuana and is why it's more reliable.
- Richard Mullins [/FONT](Drug Legislation and Enforcement Unit)
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
[/FONT]"So the measurement they make is a percentage by weight of the oils in the sample, not of the overall weight of the sample." This statement was made to explain Mullins statement to people with low reading cmprehension. The article was written by a marijuana activist group but the information was obtained from a government agency that's dealing with the regulation of marijuana in the UK not some idiot trying to profit off of medical marijuana and is why it's more reliable.
canna_420
Well-Known Member
Medicinal seeds as one that canna produced a 27% reading from
Medical Seeds Co. - Y Griega
Genotype: Amnesia x Kali Mist
20% Indica / 80% Sativa
Indoor vegetative period: 1-2 weeks
Indoor flowering period: 80-90 days
Indoor production per m2: more than 500gr
Outdoor height: Up to 3.5m
Outdoor harvest: Early November
Outdoor production: 550gr
THC: 27.12% / CBD: Low
Medical Seeds Co. - Y Griega
Genotype: Amnesia x Kali Mist
20% Indica / 80% Sativa
Indoor vegetative period: 1-2 weeks
Indoor flowering period: 80-90 days
Indoor production per m2: more than 500gr
Outdoor height: Up to 3.5m
Outdoor harvest: Early November
Outdoor production: 550gr
THC: 27.12% / CBD: Low
burrr
Active Member
They are talking about the ratios of canibinoids, not the ratio of thc to plant matter. If you want to prove the guys at the lab wrong, you'll have to find something better than this.
Matt Rize
Hashmaster
new word for our friend: FAILTALITY!
stonedmetalhead1
Well-Known Member
That's exactly my point and is what these test give results for. None of these tests mentioned give ratio's compared to plant matter and that's why they are being misleading. If you want to go on thinking cannabis is capable of structurally being 25% THC by volume then go ahead but it just shows your ignorance. If a sample of marijuana tests at 25% then it means 25% of the oils are made up of thc not 25% of the plant matter. On the example where the hash tested at 90% and it was a 90 micron hash it tested high because it was a refined hash. I guarantee you that if the hash was tested using a 120 micron filter it wouldn't be 90% but more along the lines of the high 20's. Testing bulk hash would give you a more equivalent view of what a strain can produce and is why when you see bulk hash test results the results are more congruent to the numbers you see when plant matter that's been tested. Show me one test result where 120 micron/bulk hash has tested anywhere close to 90%.
RPsmoke420
Active Member
Percentage results generally represent a percent of total sample size.
When using a GC, the sample must be first run through a dehydration unit, to account for total water weight. So, 10% THC is also 100mg/g THC minus water weight.
I become skeptical at any flower results over 20%. Hash I begin to doubt over the 60% mark. Not that these numbers do not happen, just not likely, and more likely to be a lab/human error. And of course, only a partial dehydration can be reached, as 100% dehydration doesn't happen, we'd be left with dust.
stonedmetalhead1
Well-Known Member
They are not testing against plant matter only oils, it's not how these tests work.
RPsmoke420
Active Member
Which tests? HPLC? GC?
The labs I am most familiar with, are all reporting results based on total (dried) flower weight.
The labs I am most familiar with, are all reporting results based on total (dried) flower weight.
Matt Rize
Hashmaster
Man, he's been on this trip for over a year now. I told him this is what I studied in school specifically. He denies what FSL published on the topic too. Ya know.
Cannabisworks
Active Member
any seed bank showing higher than low 20 for thc is full of it. they are missleading us by adding all cannabinoids and the precurser acids. after 30 years of this ive yet to see a true thc number alone of more that 20%...THC aln0oe notice..not total cannabinoids., theres more to it than THC,you want hi THC then cut from week 5 to 6. thats when we peek in THC. then it degrades at is roipens but we get cbd and cbn after this and is more important to the hi than thc is
Cannabisworks
Active Member
and if they use a gas chromatography then its a bunk reading because of the heat. liquid is the only true reading