How sadistic is this mainstream media report?

Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member

Boasting about killing people from farther away..

I saw this and it hit me that only a society that endorses violence could appreciate it
 
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:

Boasting about killing people from farther away..

I saw this and it hit me that only a society that endorses violence could appreciate it
Click to expand...
Killing terrorists at a distance with no collateral damage, precision kills at a safe range is your problem?

When you start chopping off innocent civilians' heads that's what happens to you. They're our enemy by choice.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
SneekyNinja said:
Killing terrorists at a distance with no collateral damage, precision kills at a safe range is your problem?

When you start chopping off innocent civilians' heads that's what happens to you. They're our enemy by choice.
Click to expand...
American mainstream media outlets boasting about more effective/efficient ways to kill people across the globe funded by American tax dollars is my problem. It is a sick society in which we live when you can't show a nipple on cable TV because it might offend some people, but can show how effective at killing members of the military can be.

Nipples are bad because those offended Christians vote for Republicans. Death and destruction are good because they shape the mindset of the youth - ironically - of most of those same Christians who get offended by seeing a nipple on cable TV and it helps turn them into authority abiding weapons of fodder for politicians in future wars and conflicts.

Propaganda like what I posted in the OP serves to nationalize citizens, and most of them aren't even aware they're being manipulated by it
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
American mainstream media outlets boasting about more effective/efficient ways to kill people across the globe funded by American tax dollars is my problem. It is a sick society in which we live when you can't show a nipple on cable TV because it might offend some people, but can show how effective at killing members of the military can be.

Nipples are bad because those offended Christians vote for Republicans. Death and destruction are good because they shape the mindset of the youth - ironically - of most of those same Christians who get offended by seeing a nipple on cable TV and it helps turn them into authority abiding weapons of fodder for politicians in future wars and conflicts.

Propaganda like what I posted in the OP serves to nationalize citizens, and most of them aren't even aware they're being manipulated by it
Click to expand...
You can see plenty of nipples if you subscribe to premium channels like HBO or SHOWTIME, but if you are looking for shit like buttholes being expose with duc-tape, well I guess you have to keep doing what you been doing.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
American mainstream media outlets boasting about more effective/efficient ways to kill people across the globe funded by American tax dollars is my problem. It is a sick society in which we live when you can't show a nipple on cable TV because it might offend some people, but can show how effective at killing members of the military can be.

Nipples are bad because those offended Christians vote for Republicans. Death and destruction are good because they shape the mindset of the youth - ironically - of most of those same Christians who get offended by seeing a nipple on cable TV and it helps turn them into authority abiding weapons of fodder for politicians in future wars and conflicts.

Propaganda like what I posted in the OP serves to nationalize citizens, and most of them aren't even aware they're being manipulated by it
Click to expand...
embedded puritanical values. they built the prisons before they built the hospital, and killing is glorified. don't mention any of the sexing though.
 
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
American mainstream media outlets boasting about more effective/efficient ways to kill people across the globe funded by American tax dollars is my problem. It is a sick society in which we live when you can't show a nipple on cable TV because it might offend some people, but can show how effective at killing members of the military can be.

Nipples are bad because those offended Christians vote for Republicans. Death and destruction are good because they shape the mindset of the youth - ironically - of most of those same Christians who get offended by seeing a nipple on cable TV and it helps turn them into authority abiding weapons of fodder for politicians in future wars and conflicts.

Propaganda like what I posted in the OP serves to nationalize citizens, and most of them aren't even aware they're being manipulated by it
Click to expand...
I agree, but is it not a justified cause to kill ISIS in a precise and relatively safe manner?

They've enslaved local populations where they've been holding territory, etc.

The problems come with all the innocents we kill doing it usually.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
SneekyNinja said:
I agree, but is it not a justified cause to kill ISIS in a precise and relatively safe manner?

They've enslaved local populations where they've been holding territory, etc.

The problems come with all the innocents we kill doing it usually.
Click to expand...
ISIS is gone. we've all but chased them out of their last two strongholds. a few hundred that are left will likely fight to the death, but they are a splinter group now.

for that matter, al qaeda is peacefully sharing a border with israel right now.

the world is a strange place.

and long range snipers are not a viable military strategy, just one single part of it.
 
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
ISIS is gone. we've all but chased them out of their last two strongholds. a few hundred that are left will likely fight to the death, but they are a splinter group now.

for that matter, al qaeda is peacefully sharing a border with israel right now.

the world is a strange place.

and long range snipers are not a viable military strategy, just one single part of it.
Click to expand...
Not 3.5km but closer to 1.5 maybe is generally viable, about 3000ft. Happy 2nd July (the real independence day).
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
SneekyNinja said:
Not 3.5km but closer to 1.5 maybe is generally viable, about 3000ft. Happy 2nd July (the real independence day).
Click to expand...
ISIS goes block by block, either kicking people out of their homes or commandeering them in city strongholds. then they hollow out the living room and tunnel to the next house they control. they literally just stack the dirt and debris in the rest of the house. no one knows which house they are in until they literally kick in the door and see the scene of dirt and debris piled high all over the house.

this is how they maintain their hold over cities like mosul. snipers are completely ineffective against this. bombing is completely ineffective against this. it literally needs to be fought like stalingrad, only worse. even more lethal close quarter combat. it's really a new type of warfare that our military would need to sacrifice many young men to defeat.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
follow up: our drones are completely ineffective against this as well. but ISIS has drones too. and from their tunnels and houses, they fly out drones to survey incoming offensives. their drones are effective. they tell their fighters exactly where to attack.

and then, from their network of underground tunnels, they are able to position themselves to attack, with men and mortars and munitions, and then rapidly retreat with almost zero casualties.

say what you want about ISIS, but they have found ingenious ways to fight a guerilla war against foreign invaders with devastating capacity against us and almost minimal death toll on their side.

that said, all the retards who fear they will conquer america with sharia law are idiots. they can't even hold onto their own gains anymore. they are on the ropes. they will resort to terror attacks wherever they can because that is all they have left.
 
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
follow up: our drones are completely ineffective against this as well. but ISIS has drones too. and from their tunnels and houses, they fly out drones to survey incoming offensives. their drones are effective. they tell their fighters exactly where to attack.

and then, from their network of underground tunnels, they are able to position themselves to attack, with men and mortars and munitions, and then rapidly retreat with almost zero casualties.

say what you want about ISIS, but they have found ingenious ways to fight a guerilla war against foreign invaders with devastating capacity against us and almost minimal death toll on their side.

that said, all the retards who fear they will conquer america with sharia law are idiots. they can't even hold onto their own gains anymore. they are on the ropes. they will resort to terror attacks wherever they can because that is all they have left.
Click to expand...
Totally agree, it's the bombing that I have an issue with.

It simply breeds another generation of radicals with genuine and direct reason for their radicalization.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top