Hunter Biden Indicted By Law Joe Biden Helped Make

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Not me. I don't own any guns. I observe the regulations when it comes to weed too.

Equal justice for all, I say.

Do you own guns and smoke weed? Whatever time Hunter does for what he did should apply to anybody who did the same. Give them what they want no matter how much it hurts. MAGA.
 
Last edited:

printer

Well-Known Member
Dershowitz to Newsmax: Hunter Biden Won't Stand Trial on Gun Charges
Harvard Law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz, in an interview with Newsmax, predicted Hunter Biden will work out a plea deal and avoid standing trial on gun charges, during an appearance on Friday's "National Report."

"There's not going to be a full-blown trial," he said. "There will be a plea bargain. This was a tactic to just raise the ante. The plea bargain, I predict, will be as follows: Biden will admit to the facts underlying these three charges; admit that he lied; admit that he owned a gun while he was addicted to drugs … he'll admit all that, but he'll challenge some of the aspects of the indictment on legal grounds, on Second Amendment grounds, on double jeopardy grounds, which will entitle him to appeal the case.

"So I predict there won't be a full-blown trial, will be a kind of guilty play, and it will result in a probationary sentence, which is typical for a first offender who was charged with these kinds of crimes."

Asked the difference between Hunter Biden's original plea deal, which fell apart and a possible new one, Dershowitz said: "The difference is that in the original plea, it was a diversion, which doesn't give you a criminal record. He'd have to plead guilty and get a criminal record and be put on probation.

"So there is a difference. It's not a big deal difference. But if it's my client, I care that he not have a criminal record. The other big difference is in the original plea we weren't sure whether it kept open the possibility of further investigations and further indictments. That's why it fell apart. Here we now know that there can be further investigations, including investigations pointing to the Oval Office."

Asked what he thought of special counsel David Weiss' handling of the case, Dershowitz responded: "He shouldn't have been appointed. He's a Delaware guy. People say he was appointed by Donald Trump. It's nonsense. He was appointed essentially by the two Democratic senators in Delaware.

"Trump rubber stamped the appointment as happens with U.S. attorneys, but he was exactly the wrong person to do this investigation. Now he's flexing his muscles a little bit, but the end result will be no prison time and a probationary sentence and perhaps an appeal on these two technical legal issues."
 

Aeroknow

Well-Known Member
Dershowitz to Newsmax: Hunter Biden Won't Stand Trial on Gun Charges
Harvard Law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz, in an interview with Newsmax, predicted Hunter Biden will work out a plea deal and avoid standing trial on gun charges, during an appearance on Friday's "National Report."

"There's not going to be a full-blown trial," he said. "There will be a plea bargain. This was a tactic to just raise the ante. The plea bargain, I predict, will be as follows: Biden will admit to the facts underlying these three charges; admit that he lied; admit that he owned a gun while he was addicted to drugs … he'll admit all that, but he'll challenge some of the aspects of the indictment on legal grounds, on Second Amendment grounds, on double jeopardy grounds, which will entitle him to appeal the case.

"So I predict there won't be a full-blown trial, will be a kind of guilty play, and it will result in a probationary sentence, which is typical for a first offender who was charged with these kinds of crimes."

Asked the difference between Hunter Biden's original plea deal, which fell apart and a possible new one, Dershowitz said: "The difference is that in the original plea, it was a diversion, which doesn't give you a criminal record. He'd have to plead guilty and get a criminal record and be put on probation.

"So there is a difference. It's not a big deal difference. But if it's my client, I care that he not have a criminal record. The other big difference is in the original plea we weren't sure whether it kept open the possibility of further investigations and further indictments. That's why it fell apart. Here we now know that there can be further investigations, including investigations pointing to the Oval Office."

Asked what he thought of special counsel David Weiss' handling of the case, Dershowitz responded: "He shouldn't have been appointed. He's a Delaware guy. People say he was appointed by Donald Trump. It's nonsense. He was appointed essentially by the two Democratic senators in Delaware.

"Trump rubber stamped the appointment as happens with U.S. attorneys, but he was exactly the wrong person to do this investigation. Now he's flexing his muscles a little bit, but the end result will be no prison time and a probationary sentence and perhaps an appeal on these two technical legal issues."
@Jafo232
Does this make you sad? Oh,
I forgot to ask you yesterday. Do you own guns? Do you grow, or just smoke the herb?
Just curious here because you seemed really excited about a guy facing charges over this.
Republican or Democrat, what you are so stoked about is pretty shitty man.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
The party that is already lining up at election polling sites to vote for Trump in the Primary is swooning over Hunter's gun charges. They completely overlook charges Trump is facing, like violation of the espionage act and conspiracy to commit election fraud. But Hunter illegally purchased a gun, OMG. No true pot smoking or Oxy addicted Trump supporter would ever lie when they filled out an ATF form before purchasing a gun.

aatempfornow.gif
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
The party that is already lining up at election polling sites to vote for Trump in the Primary is swooning over Hunter's gun charges. They completely overlook charges Trump is facing, like violation of the espionage act and conspiracy to commit election fraud. But Hunter illegally purchased a gun, OMG. No true pot smoking or Oxy addicted Trump supporter would ever lie when they filled out an ATF form before purchasing a gun.

View attachment 5326930
Nobody said they were reality based and hypocrisy is their hallmark.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
The party that is already lining up at election polling sites to vote for Trump in the Primary is swooning over Hunter's gun charges. They completely overlook charges Trump is facing, like violation of the espionage act and conspiracy to commit election fraud. But Hunter illegally purchased a gun, OMG. No true pot smoking or Oxy addicted Trump supporter would ever lie when they filled out an ATF form before purchasing a gun.

View attachment 5326930
I was always amused by this ad campaign. “I did, and I fkn missed, assholes!”

1694836857074.jpeg
 

DeadHeadX

Well-Known Member
Actually I don't think Hunter should have had to answer any of those questions and should be allowed to buy a gun even if he consumes any drug. What he does is his own business.

I find it funny that his party disagrees with me and is now all up in arms (pun intended) that the gun control THEY passed is actually being applied to one of THEM.

So don't get me wrong. I agree and think it should have never gotten this far; I just disagree as to why.

And come on, can you blame me for laughing at seeing hypocrisy being exposed? Heh.
Who and where do you see people “up in arms” about this? Actually, no one seems to give a shit. He’s a private citizen, not an elected or appointed anything. You’re simply promoting yet another myth so-called conservatives can grab onto to fill themselves with hate and lies. I know there are some really fine conservatives out there, but they are being chased from the party by partisan insanity. Whoever convinced you that democrats were the enemy, they suckered you my friend, to get your vote forever. You hate liberals, right? If the answer is a blanket “yes”, you’ve been conned and brainwashed. Same for folk on the left.
 
Last edited:

Highway61

Well-Known Member
Yeah, but it would be more delicious if they passed the laws in the first place. It is nice to see the Democrats get burned by their own laws.
Get burned? I hate to see Hunter Biden's chemical dependency used to bully him and his father but I have no problem with the idea that cocaine or meth users cannot buy guns. They are a paranoid and violent bunch.
 
Top